similar to: how to create the solr index from the data getting from two

hi guys, i have develop some coding like login forms and registration forms in normal ROR way. they are working 100% ok as i want. bt not i have created the html interface to my page and find dificult to add the ROR components that i have created to the newly design web interface. For a example. in the in my HTML file i have a allocate separate area(in the top right hand corner of the page.)

The Solr FTS engine appends domain names to the "user" and "id" fields inside Solr when indexing. However, when an IMAP search is performed, the domain name is not appended, resulting in 0 results, 100% of the time. You can reproduce this by setting up dovecot to have user names like?"admin", "james", etc (as opposed to admin at example.com). Then import

Hi folks, We are working with Dovecot 2.0.9 with Solr support and there is a thing, a little strange for us. Let me explain. We have this conf for Solr: plugin { ... fts = solr fts_solr = url=http:// solr.domain:8983/solr/ break-imap-search quota = maildir ... } With 'break-imap-search', Dovecot connects with solr, solr indexes all, searchs are

Hi, guys, Can you give me an example of solr usage in dovecot? As far as I know, you can search email easily by MUA like outlook, so which role does solr play? And based on https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2019-April/115575.html I'm going to use an VIP to host 2 mail servers. Currently, it works in fail over and fail back test except solr index, so how to resolve this? Is it

On 13/11/2020 21:32, PGNet Dev wrote: > On 11/13/20 11:37 AM, John Fawcett wrote: >>> still dunno why the 401. :-/ >> >> So I just did a quick check of running dovecot with a standalone >> solr-8.7.0 instance and I'm not seeing any issues. > > +1 > >> I confirm I haven't configured anything for indexer or indexer-worker in >> dovecot, just

On 11/13/20 9:46 AM, John Fawcett wrote: >> (1) Can anyone yet verify Doveoct/fts-solr working with solr 8.7.x?>> (2) What logging config in Dovecot gets me more/detailed output for the fts_solr fail? >> (3) Any obvious clues as to what, specifically, is the source of this prob? >> > (1) I can't, I'm still on an earlier version I'll look for the 8.6.3,

Hi, I'm running Dovecot with FTS and Apache Solr as backend. What is the command or the query to remove from Solr a deleted user/mailbox? Thanks -- Alessio Cecchi Postmaster AT http://www.qboxmail.it http://www.linkedin.com/in/alessice

Given all the discussion on FTS/Solr, etc, I have a question: I have autoindex set, and searching in roundcube most of the time does NOT find things, HOWEVER if I do: doveadm fts rescan doveadm index I can find things in the mailboxes. WHY? (doveconf -n attached). -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 (c) E-Mail: larryrtx at gmail.com US

On 13/11/2020 19:55, PGNet Dev wrote: > On 11/13/20 9:56 AM, PGNet Dev wrote: >>> (2) see here: https://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS/Solr >>> >>> two useful settings are debug and rawlog_dir=whatever to be added in >>> the same line as fts_solr > > with > > ????fts_solr = ... debug > > line #35 @ https://pastebin.com/9ecLQspD _looks_ like

I've built a new dovecot + fts-solr instance; I've now picked up & am running the recently released solr 8.7.0. In a test account, I've one message -- in the 'Drafts' folder. On exec of fts 'index' doveadm index -u testuser at example.com -q '*' I get a 401 unauthorized indexing failure, only for the one dir+message in 'Drafts', 2020-11-13

Hello, try to use the new 2.1rc and don't get any data in the searchindex. Tried first lucene, and switched than back so solr. If I do an search in an mailfolder, i get in the dovecot-log 2012-02-06 22:17:11 | dovecot: | indexer-worker(xxxxxx): Indexed 0 messages in INBOX/dovecot Log from solr. Feb 6, 2012 10:17:11 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute INFO: []

Indexing mail attachments with Dovecot + Solr. This patch has been tested with these versions: * dovecot 2.0.9 * apache-solr 1.4.1 This is a patch for the fts-solr plugin (that indexes mail messages for Dovecot with Solr). In main stream, the plugin does not index attachments; With this patch, you can index mails and their attachments (pdf, docs, openoffice docs...) . You can get others

On 13/11/2020 22:04, PGNet Dev wrote: >> I guess you didn't need to enclose username and password in quotes, i.e. >> >> fts_solr = >> url=https://myuser:my%40pass at solr.example.com:8984/solr/dovecot/ >> use_libfts soft_commit=yes batch_size=250 > > On 11/13/20 12:56 PM, John Fawcett wrote: > >> I guess you didn't need to enclose username and

Dovecot version: 2.1.rc1 Expat version: expat-2.0.1-10 Libcurl version: libcurl-7.21.0-10 OS: Fedora 14 i686 Configure command: ./configure --with-solr Solr version: 1.4.1 (also tried 3.5.0) Java version: java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-55.1.9.10 (also tried Oracle Java 6u29) [root at mymailserver ~]# doveadm -D index -u username mailbox inbox doveadm(username): Info: INBOX: Caching mails

Hello. We're setting up fts solr and want to have the solr server host be set per-user via UserDB. It looks like if a user connects and fts indexes mail, and then another user connects and indexes mail, indexer-worker is connecting to the first user's fts host: User1, hammer at rp-auth-test.com connects, does a SEARCH for the first time, indexer-worker gets UserDB settings and

I came across this benchmark between Xapian & Solr: http://www.anur.ag/blog/2009/03/xapian-and-solr/ According to the benchmark, a doc set that took Solr 34 min to index took Xapian 7 hours. Solr's index is also much smaller - 2.5GB to Xapian's 8.9GB. I'm new to Xapian. Just wondering if results like these are typical? Is indexing speed & size a known issue in Xapian? Or is

Hello Timo and everyone, I am using dovecot 2.1 on debian7 with the fts-solr plugin, and everything is working fine. I have a Virtual folder with all emails, and when I run a doveadm index, I have an error if I don't index real folders first. Example: doveadm -v index -u 'andre rodier' 'Search/*' => Panic: file solr-connection.c: line 416 (solr_connection_select):

Hi, Looking at the source, it doesn't seem like fts-solr checks for settings changes using fts_index_have_compatible_settings() like fts-lucene does. Is there any special reason for why fts-solr shouldn't also rebuild indexes if settings has changed? /Peter

In the code, it says #define SOLR_HEADER_MAX_SIZE (1024*1024) and line 620 if (!ctx->truncate_header && str_len(ctx->cur_value) >= SOLR_HEADER_MAX_SIZE) { /* a large header */ so this is a 1Mo header. This is of course completely wrong. Maybe this is not the root cause of the errors of fts_solr, but maybe this will help On 2019-01-02 18:00, Joan Moreau via dovecot