Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "prio bands and ignored priomap when any tc filter is present"
2012 Nov 20
3
Simple Traffic Shaping Problem
Hello,
I have a problem with simple traffic shapping in shorewall, my current
configuration is:
zones
vlan10 ipv4 #
interfaces
vlan10 vlan10 detect tcpflags,routeback
shorewall.conf
TC_ENABLED=Simple
tcinterfaces
vlan10 Internal 1mbit:50kb
shorewall show tc
Device vlan10:
qdisc prio 5: root refcnt 2 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2005 Sep 28
4
Re:Does HTB consider PRIO or not? 2
Thanks for quick reply Andreas!
> Every class is allowed to use bandwidth as long as it does not have to
> borrow (the specified rate is guaranteed). Prio in HTB only affects
> borrowing bandwidth from other classes... In the example below, the class
> 1:5 should be allowed to borrow bandwidth before 1:14 does.
Thats exactly what I want from HTB to do..to prio the borrowed bandwidth.
2010 Apr 22
1
PRIO qdisc + iptables TOS target
i am trying to do some traffic classification using the PRIO qdisc and
i am having a few problems.
I have a root htb class:
tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1: htb default 255 r2q 1
tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 768kbit
and a child PRIO
tc class add dev imq0 parent 1:1 classid 1:99 htb rate 96kbit ceil
600kbit prio 0
tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:99 prio
tc filter
2007 Jun 15
0
sangoma WAN boards with lartc
Hi
anyone using sangoma hardware with lartc? pls let me know
Thanks
Imthiyaz
Original Message:
-----------------
From: lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:00:07 +0200 (CEST)
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: LARTC Digest, Vol 28, Issue 23
Send LARTC mailing list submissions to
lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
2007 Feb 01
0
tc filter Questions
I''m attempting to set up a hierarchy of tc qdiscs with filters, but the
filters don''t seem to be working correctly. I''m running iptables 1.3.5
with iproute 2.6.16.20060323 on a Gentoo 2.6.18 kernel. The system
takes all my tc setup, but does not filter packets as I am expecting it
to based on my ruleset.
My tc qdiscs and classes are added correctly and report as
2007 Aug 19
0
HTB qdisc within HTB root qdisc
Hello...
Im trying to setup HTB to allow me to shape traffic from two upstreams
that meets on single lan0 interface. I prefer to use HTB qdisc
within HTB root qdisc for cleaner rules design.
Seems that it doesnt work at all. tc -s class show doesnt
show any traffic on other classes attached to HTB qdisc.
Linux 2.6.20.7
iproute-2.6.20-070313
Weird thing is that tc -s class show that 1: and 2:
2005 Dec 04
6
tbf and prio blocking some flows entirely
I thought I had this all worked out, but it seems not. The following tc
configuration:
tc qdisc del dev ppp0 root 2> /dev/null > /dev/null
tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root handle 1: tbf rate 120kbit burst 1200 limit 1
tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 handle 2: prio bands 3
tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 2:1 handle 10: sfq perturb 20
tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 2:2 handle 20: sfq perturb 20
tc
2007 May 19
1
Re: LARTC Digest, Vol 27, Issue 26
Hi folks...!!!
I need to generate qdisc statistics to show my 4 class (10, 20, 30, 40),
i`ve all working with HTB and so on, but i need to graph this results
e.gwith RRDTOOL.
I found a script made in perl, that can to graph my 4 class, but i need to
know which IP address on my LAN are using the bandwidth too, in other hand i
need to classify the traffic by IP to show.
This is an out of my
2006 Feb 24
4
why isn''t 1:1 getting the traffic? [filter question]
With the below script, whenever I ping 10.0.16.10 (which matches the
only filter I have), traffic still get''s sent to the default 1:2 class
instead of 1:1 and I don''t know why... Any hints?
(kernel 2.6.12, iproute2-2.6.15)
tc qdisc del dev eth0 root > /dev/null 2>&1
tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1: root htb default 2
tc class add dev eth0 classid 1:1 parent 1: htb rate
2006 Sep 06
0
Can i attach another qdisc (htb) under HFSC classfull ?
Hi,
Is it possible to attach another qdisq under a HFSC classfull ?
I try it and the configuraton works :
$TC qdisc add dev $dev root handle 1: hfsc default 30
$TC class add dev $dev parent 1: classid 1:1 hfsc sc rate
${RATE}mbit ul rate ${RATE}mbit
$TC class add dev $dev parent 1:1 classid 1:10 hfsc rt umax 1500b
dmax 30ms rate 200kbit
$TC class add dev $dev
2007 Dec 15
1
hfsc and bps
Hi!
Do you know somthing about hfsc and bps?
There''s no output for speed only for packets. Doesn''t hfsc support such
a field?
tc -s class show dev eth0
class hfsc 1: root
Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
period 0 level 2
class hfsc 1:11 parent 1:1 sc m1 0bit d 18.0ms m2 1000Kbit ul m1 0bit d
0us m2
2005 Mar 25
3
These tc commands used to work... what''s broken them?
I have a Gentoo Linux (kernel 2.6.11) server. Several months ago, I
made a traffic shaping setup for my box (running a 2.4 kernel then)
that worked beautifully. It gave high priority to SSH and RealAudio
traffic, and put HTTP downloading traffic on a lower prio so they could
only use what bandwidth was left.
However, I''ve only just realized that tc is no longer accepting the
commands I
2007 Sep 19
1
major packet loss with htb
Hi,
got a 25/25Mbit connection which is quite stuffed. So I applied htb rules.
Uplink:
class htb 1:1 root rate 24500Kbit ceil 24500Kbit burst 4661b/8 mpu 0b
overhead 0b cburst 4661b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 7
Sent 430600689269 bytes 730147320 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
rate 23057Kbit 5520pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
lended: 199673949 borrowed: 0 giants: 0
tokens: -964
2007 Aug 24
3
traffic shaping stranges
Hello list,
I discover strange behaviour of shaping traffic that i setup from
Shorewall-4.0.2.
I know that this is not Shorewall problem but may be somebody from list
can help me
or explain this situation.
I have follow interfaces in 'tcdevices' files:
#INTERFACE IN-BANDWITH OUT-BANDWIDTH
#
$EXT_IF 500kbit 248kbit
$INT1_IF 500mbit
2006 Apr 09
2
tc counters "problem"
Hi, I''m using tc and HTB to shape my outgoing ADSL traffic. I was trying to
make some graphs on the classes by meassuring the "sent bytes" of each class
using rrdtool to store the data (as kbps after conversion). I expected that
meassuring the root class I would get values similar that the ones I get
measuring the interface counters but they differ by a large amount.
Is
2006 Mar 08
1
negative token/ctokens
In this simple htb setup:
# tc -s -d class ls dev eth0
class htb 1:1 root rate 300000bit ceil 300000bit burst 1749b/8 mpu 0b overhead
0b cburst 1749b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 7
Sent 13171835 bytes 13169 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
rate 45848bit 10pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
lended: 5272 borrowed: 0 giants: 0
tokens: -84429 ctokens: -84429
class htb 1:2 parent 1:1 prio 0
2005 Apr 28
1
Packets Going to default class
Hi
I have tested with FC3 but iam not able get any good results on that.
in the list some one recomend me that > 3.17 HTB should work
I saw latest FC4 test2 has the HTB 3.17 with iptables 1.3.0
i have install in my P4 box, and trying to test
when iam uploading its working perfect, but when iam downloading its going
to default class
can some one experinced the same problem
below is the my
2007 Feb 03
0
ingress qdisc problem
Hello,
i try to limit the incoming traffic rate using the ingress qdisc, but
it does not work for me.
Here is what i have done:
# sudo tc qdisc add dev eth1 ingress
# tc filter add dev eth1 parent ffff:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip dst 172.17.0.101/32 police rate 10kbit buffer 10k drop
The ingress qdisc is there:
# tc -s qdisc show dev eth1
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1
2006 Sep 13
1
HTB shaping problem
Hi all !
I''m building a network appliance whose goals are to enhance Voip
quality on 512/128k DSL links. But, i have a voice quality problem,
and i think i''m doing something wrong, but i can''t find what. Please
excuse my terrible english, i''m french.
>From what i''ve read, tc is the tool i need. I read the documentations,
readmes and lartc.org
2005 Sep 26
1
Hmmm... Weird results with HTB in kernel 2.6.11
Hi all,
I have been getting some strange results with HTB in kernel 2.6.11, and
was wondering if anybody could give me some advice. Also, if someone
could direct me to the changelog for the recent versions so I can see if
it is worth upgrading?
Anyway, the problem can best be summed up by looking at the output of
''tc -s -d class show dev eth0''. Some of the relevant results