similar to: Custom vmlinuz/initrd.img ??

Hi, I''ve been posting this question to lots of lists and not getting good answers. I have a Ubuntu Hardy laptop. With a ssh connection to a RHEL5 xen dom0. Running cobbler/koan on the dom0 Koan --virt --nogfx ... starts a new domU on the xen box and starts up the RHEL5 installer the installer attempts to configure its network interface using DHCP and gets stuck If this was an install

Hi, I have a user that is experiencing problems pxe booting several identical servers. pxelinux.0 is from syslinux 3.63 and the TFTP server is 0.42 running on CentOS 5.2. After loading pxelinux.0, the client will then start transferring vmlinuz and initrd.img via tftp. More than half the time, the transfer will get stuck and then eventually print a timeout message. I ran tcpdump and I can see

I am having a bit of trouble setting up cobbler on this machine. cobbler check points out a few things to correct: [root at VIRTCENT04:~]#cobbler check The following are potential configuration items that you may want to fix: 1 : you need to set some SELinux content rules to ensure cobbler serves content correctly in your SELinux environment, run the following: /usr/sbin/semanage fcontext -a

Hi I am running a pxe diskless node in f13 and I have some proposals to make ovirt-early working in this version. nash is no more available (nash/mkinitrd is replaced by dracut), so this following command fails : "echo "network --device $DEVICE --bootproto dhcp" | nash" it makes the network configuration incomplete. I replace the linuxrc command by dhclient and it's

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Celia Einhorn <celia.einhorn at gmail.com> Date: Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 8:15 PM Subject: Fwd: Erika DeBenedictis-Recommendation To: drew einhorn <drew.einhorn at gmail.com> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David H. Kratzer <dhk at lanl.gov> Date: Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 9:24 AM Subject: Fwd: Erika

Hi there, I just installed oVirt and cobbler (I'm 100% novice!, so this could be a 100% silly question...). I can't get my initial host into the hardware pool. It PXE boots through cobbler, then fails with message "WARNING: Cannot find root file system!" and "Create symlink /dev/root and then exit this shell to continue the boot sequence." I suspect I didn't set

I'm new to the lists so sorry about any faux pas I may have made. Also I apologize for the length, but I wanted to be sure I covered most of the details. I'm trying to do a PXE install on an Intel 1435VP2 server machine. The PXE install has worked on all the older machines in the cluster, so I know PXE is working. However, these new Intel server machines only support PXE booting from

cc-to ovirt-devel skipping cobbler seems to be the best solution since ovirt-node-image-pxe rpm does not exist anymore. However for this to work you need to add runtime_mode=ovirt in pxelinux.cfg/default in the kernel boot options. In the node, it's useful to check /var/log/ovirt.log for correct operation. > The monkey patch was already there. The /etc/hosts entry for

This set the cobbler modules dns/dhcp to dnsmasq, removes a duplicate ip replacement in /etc/cobbler/settings, and sets the ip address to the admin network instead of the guest networkwhere it should've been in the first place. --- installer/modules/ovirt/files/modules.conf | 4 ++-- installer/modules/ovirt/manifests/cobbler.pp | 16 ++++------------ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+),

On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Hans Lellelid <hans at velum.net> wrote: > I'm sure I'm doing something wrong here, but I would appreciate a pointer. > I have tried to rtfm, but find the docs a little sparse wrt > pxechain.comand gpxelinux.0. > > I am trying to setup a pxe chain server (aka chainloading?) where one of > the entries on one pxe server forwards to

Hi everyone, We are updating local repos from different mirrors using cobbler reposync. This has been working fine for the longest time but started to fail a few days ago (see below for failure details). I first try to use a different mirror but that didn?t help. This morning, I modified cobbler to disable the auto-update for the centos/6/extras/i386/ and centos/6/extras/x86_64/ repos. After

Hi - On my CentOS 4 cobbler server i am having some odd dhcp issues. There is only 1 dhcp server on the network and the cobbler box manages the dhcp. When i kick off the PXE install during the PXE phase things seem OK then when anaconda tried to get an IP sometimes things work out fine and other times it sits waiting for hostname/domainname. From the logs you can see that the mac requesting

Hi, I'm running Centos 5 on an IBM x3550 series server with kernel version 2.6.18-8.el5 #1 SMP, dual xeon, 9GB ram system. When I run yum update, I get this error: --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: libevent-1.1a.so.1()(64bit) for package: nfs-utils --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: libevent-1.1a.so.1()(64bit) is needed by

I'm sure I'm doing something wrong here, but I would appreciate a pointer. I have tried to rtfm, but find the docs a little sparse wrt pxechain.comand gpxelinux.0. I am trying to setup a pxe chain server (aka chainloading?) where one of the entries on one pxe server forwards to another (cobbler, in this case). I know this works fine with traditional pxelinux.0 images, but it's

First,sorry my poor english~ Here is this test: Virtualization performance comparison test Test environment Physical machine: Cpu 8-core 8G memory HDD: 147G xen virtual machine: cpu 2 core 4G memory 30G hard drive wmware virtual machine: cpu 2 core 4G memory 30G hard drive Optical disk array (san) Size: 7.7T Speed: 6G/sec Testing and structural I / 0 performance test Test methods Test

Hello, Has anyone thought about how one could use the "keeppxe" option with a vmlinuz/initrd? It would allow one to boot this combination, and if possible the linux kernel/initrd (assuming we have busybox in there) would not have to run udhcp and instead leverage what pxe stack information is loaded. The problem is I don't know of any PXE/UNDI linux utilities to look at the pxe

The cell companies are "doing it" like they think makes sense. If they know your cell is off/out of range they route instantly to VM. They could give "4-10 rings" of fake effort, but why. With follow me roaming and such, they want to process the call as fast as possible. If they don't know if the cell is available, they may go through about 4 rings of searching, but

The cell companies are "doing it" like they think makes sense. If they know your cell is off/out of range they route instantly to VM. They could give "4-10 rings" of fake effort, but why. With follow me roaming and such, they want to process the call as fast as possible. If they don't know if the cell is available, they may go through about 4 rings of searching, but

Should I be concerned? [root@fs1 ~]# cobbler import --name=F18 --path=rsync://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/18/Fedora/x86_64/os --arch=x86_64 task started: 2013-01-18_062009_import task started (id=Media import, time=Fri Jan 18 06:20:09 2013) Found a redhat compatible signature: Packages adding distros creating new distro: F18-x86_64 creating new profile: F18-x86_64 associating repos

If I edit a VM and assign the operating system to an image I created under cobbler I get a http 404 error when I attempt to save the settings. The following is shown in the rails log. Processing VmController#update (for 192.168.42.102 at 2009-08-21 23:45:26) [POST] Parameters: {"vm"=>{"provisioning_and_boot_settings"=>"image at cobbler:W2k8-R2",