similar to: Killing a nohup process?

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2091 Bug ID: 2091 Summary: scp hangs while copying a large file and being executed as a background process ( with nohup ) Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.1p1 Hardware: Other OS: AIX Status: NEW Severity:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=273 ------- Additional Comments From kerry.schwab at wnco.com 2002-06-12 06:26 ------- Debug output, with comments: Get this once i'm in: >>[some omitted for brevity] >>debug1: session_new: session 0 >>debug1: Allocating pty. >>debug1: session_pty_req: session 0 alloc /dev/pts/12 >>debug1: fd 4 setting TCP_NODELAY

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=273 ------- Additional Comments From sam at neutrino.phy.uct.ac.za 2002-07-13 01:22 ------- i also have this exact same problem using OpenSSH_3.4p1, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090603f i start a program with "nohup <program> &" and upon returning to my native machine, the terminal is balnk, frozen with no bash prompt. i

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=273 Summary: sshd hangs on shell exit if user spawned child with /bin/nohup Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: UltraSparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo:

Hey guys and gals, Yesterday I had one of my scientists kill one of my servers when his program ran amok and gobbled up all the memory, or forked too many processes, or I'm just not exactly sure what to be honest. Is there something I can run manually in cron to look for rampant programs and kill them? I know that may be hard to discern but I could also include a list if "known

Hey All, I''m setting up some mongrel servers.. can''t get it to daemonize. here is my configurator block:: config = Mongrel::Configurator.new(:host => OPTIONS[:ip]) do #debug(''/gateway.rb'',[:access,:threads]) listener :port => OPTIONS[:port] do uri("/gateway.rb", :handler => RUBYAMF::MongrelServlet.new, :num_processors =>

Hi I logged in to one of my servers today and noticed that the load average is very high. After investigating the problem I found two processes in "D" stat ("uninterruptible sleep"): root 24344 0.0 0.2 1532 584 ? DN Jul21 0:01 /usr/bin/updatedb -f NFS,SMBFS,NCPFS,PROC,DEVPTS -e /tmp,/var/tmp,/usr/tmp,/afs,/net root 25899 0.0 0.2 1532 584 ? DN

When I launch ssh sessions from xterms and exit them via the command line, the processes go away, but if I just kill the xterm window an ssh was launched from via a mouse click, the ssh.exe hangs around taking up system resources until I kill it via the task manager, if I can figure out which ssh.exes are the zombies. The same problem *does not* occur from a simple bash shell window (launched via

Perhaps the man page should be fixed then, because neither rsh nor rlogin provide any kind of port forwarding, or X11 forwarding, etc... Also, the comparison between ssh and rsh is more appropriate if you're talking about SSHv1 and much less so if you're talking about SSHv2. Nico -- > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Garff [mailto:egarff at omniture.com] > Sent:

Hi all, Sometimes I'll find myself "ctrl-c"-ing like a madman to kill some code that's parallelized via foreach/doMC when I realized that I just set my cpu off to do something boneheaded, and it will keep doing that thing for a while. In these situations, since I interrupted its normal execution, foreach/doMC doesn't "clean up" after itself by killing the

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1463 Summary: Running nohup sleep 70 & and then exiting shell, hangs ssh Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.0p1 Platform: Sparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component:

Hi, I would like to briefly comment on a problem mentioned in the file "TODO" and also in the OpenSSH FAQ (question 3.10), namely the hanging of an ssh connection (on Linux) if there are active processes. It is stated that this has to do with the fact that children of the shell are not killed upon exiting the shell. However, the problem also occurs if a process is started with

Hello, I've got rsync --daemon running on an OSX machine, and I have it exporting the entire hard disk as [rootpath]. On my Linux machine, I run this: rsync -avvv --delete --exclude /Volumes macbox::rootpath /mnt/bkup/macbox I redirect the output from that command to a file (nohup.out), and then tail the file, and I see that it never gets beyond the recv_file_name() stage. In about 4

On 4/7/2023 1:13 PM, Yuri wrote: > On 4/7/23 10:08, Bob Rasmussen wrote: >> It depends how you "kill" the SSH server. >> >> If you kill it by sending it a SIGKILL signal, it will NOT notify the >> client, so the client will stay running until the client discovers >> the connection is broken. > > > I run 'kill <pid>' which sends

Dear All, Let me quote a few lines from TODO file (SNAP-20010109): - Linux hangs for 20 seconds when you do "sleep 20&exit". All current solutions break scp or leaves processes hanging around after the ssh connection has ended. It seems to be linked to two things. One select() under Linux is not as nice as others, and two the children of the shell are not killed on

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 09:55:53AM +0200, Shahar Havivi wrote: > Hi, > > I am successfully importing VM from Xen server at oVirt project via virt-v2v. > I am setting ssh-agent and running ssh-add before the import process, > after the import done I am trying to kill the agent via: > ssh-agent -k (and setting the SSH_AGENT_PID environment), but I get the > following error:

G'day, I am running an overnight (off-peak) replication using "rsync --partial" which is "suspended" at 08h30 each morning to allow for day time use of the internet link. However it seems the "kill -TERM" on the various rsync (and ssh) processes is too aggressive as I can not see any trace of the .hidden partial transfer files. I tried killing only the (parent)

Hi, Interesting "feature" in 10.11.4. I wonder if the process is killed before or after malloc() returns. If before, it seems very blunt: "You're asking too much and I don't like it so I kill you now". If after it doesn't look much better: "You're asking a lot and I don't like it but I give it to you anyway. I'll kill you quickly later". Why

Hello, First, I'd like to say sorry if this isn't the right mailing list to ask my question. I'm writting some application(on Linux) wich relys on sshd, so I thought there is nothing wrong in posting my mail here. The aplication i'm writting should, at some point, kill the user from his terminal line. To achieve this I read the users utmp entry and kill the ut_pid in it.. It

On 13.01.16 10:27, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 09:55:53AM +0200, Shahar Havivi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am successfully importing VM from Xen server at oVirt project via virt-v2v. > > I am setting ssh-agent and running ssh-add before the import process, > > after the import done I am trying to kill the agent via: > > ssh-agent -k (and