similar to: Why?? NFS cached permissions groups etc

Dear R People: I'm having trouble installing Rmpi on a debian machine. Here is my output: bccd at node000:~$ /bccd/home/bccd bccd at node000:~$ bccd at node000:~$ export RMPI_TYPE=OPENMPI bccd at node000:~$ R CMD INSTALL Rmpi_0.5-9.tar.gz * installing to library '/bccd/home/bccd/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/2.15' * installing *source* package 'Rmpi' ... checking for gcc...

Where did I go wrong? [root at mail busdev]# stat . File: `.' Size: 4096 Blocks: 16 IO Block: 32768 Directory Device: ah/10d Inode: 147591 Links: 5 Access: (0750/drwxr-x---) Uid: (56755/ busdev) Gid: (56755/ busdev) Access: 2008-01-06 15:49:53.000000000 -0500 Modify: 2008-01-06 15:49:15.000000000 -0500 Change: 2008-01-06 15:59:59.000000000 -0500 [root at

Can my jpyeron user be blessed to update the WIKI, so a CentOS 6 and CentOS 7 VPAT can be posted? Recommending under FAQ or AdditionalResources -Jason > -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:jpyeron at pdinc.us] > Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 14:08 > To: 'centos-devel at centos.org' > Subject: VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliance statement >

Did you work this via the CentOS Board to make sure its ok to post ? Regards On 22/09/16 19:44, Jason Pyeron wrote: > I was able to rename my (very old) user to JasonPyeron . > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: centos-docs-bounces at centos.org >> [mailto:centos-docs-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron >> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 14:39

let me chase that up, I dont really understand what a VPAT might be, looks to be US centric - but it also looks like it aims to make assertions on and from the CentOS project side. best to work it via the board first. Regards On 22/09/16 22:27, Jason Pyeron wrote: > I posted on the dev list last October, no feedback. > > How (did not seem to be a high level issue for board concern, it

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11101 Bug ID: 11101 Summary: support writing to devices Product: rsync Version: 3.0.6 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter: jpyeron at

> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Ricles > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:42 > > Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by > that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can > use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license. But you will still need a (self?) support plan to be STIG compliant. >

On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:41 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote: > Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by > that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can > use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license. I would recommend RHEL for critical systems or those that must be certified for a particular purpose, such as CA servers.

OK there are problems. From https://sourceforge.net/p/edk2/mailman/message/31604654/ ""In current EDKII implementation, all the network servicebinding protocols for a NIC device are installed together on the NIC's device handle, so you can get all of them when you have chosen a special NIC handle."" Unfortunately there are PCs with UEFI implementations not following the

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Patrick Masotta <masottaus at yahoo.com> wrote: >>>> > Commit 23b2707 should resolve this. Please > let me know if you need > test binaries > > -- > -Gene > <<< > > > 1) About the Service Binding protocols, PXE protocol, etc having the same handle# is clear if we > see that the number is in fact

On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 13:09 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote: > That is true, which we are using ours for critical things. Guess RHEL > will be the way to go till Centos is maybe approved for critical > systems as well. That's really up to the program manager in which the machine would be used. He would make a determination whether it's supportable and maintainable, based on in-house

> -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Evans > Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 12:50 PM > > On 4/19/20 12:38 PM, S.Bob wrote: > > > > On 4/19/20 10:36 AM, Tim Evans wrote: > >> On 4/19/20 12:28 PM, S.Bob wrote: > >>> All; > >>> > >>> > >>> I installed sendmail via yum, but if I test it like this: > >>>

Any ideas? This one would make the 10th email received. Return-Path: <centos-bounces at centos.org> Received: from psmtp.com (exprod8mx192.postini.com [64.18.3.171]) by mail.pdinc.us (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id p2LKkur4025229 for <jpyeron at pdinc.us>; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:46:57 -0400 Received: from source ([72.26.200.202]) by exprod8mx192.postini.com ([64.18.7.10]) with

> -----Original Message----- > From: S.Bob > Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 2:26 PM > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [Off topic] sending mail from Comcast was: Sendmail not working > > I followed this guide: > > > https://pepipost.com/tutorials/install-sendmail-server-centos-7/ Sigh - bad examples for you.... undo if you can. Postfix provides the

I need help interpeting this issue, thanks in advance. A file was created by user nli on windows 7, that user can manipulate the file at will. If user jpyeron tries to manipulate the file on XPx64 the below happens. # smbd -V Version 3.0.33-3.40.el5_10 [2015/02/02 18:34:15, 8] smbd/dosmode.c:dos_mode_from_sbuf(188) dos_mode_from_sbuf returning [2015/02/02 18:34:15, 8]

Jason, Please let me know if you need any additional help with this request. I agree that a Centos 7 VPAT should be publicized. On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Jason Pyeron <jpyeron at pdinc.us> wrote: > I was able to rename my (very old) user to JasonPyeron . > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: centos-docs-bounces at centos.org > >

I posted on the dev list last October, no feedback. How (did not seem to be a high level issue for board concern, it is down at the FAQ level) do I run it by the Board? In other words, where do I discuss this? I will send the 2 vpats from my .gov account in a moment. -Jason > -----Original Message----- > From: Karanbir Singh > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 17:07 > > Did you

See other thread/reply. > -----Original Message----- > From: CentOS <centos-bounces at centos.org> On Behalf Of S.Bob > Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 3:11 PM > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [Off topic] sending mail from Comcast was: Sendmail not working > > OK, I've fired up a new VM, new CentOS 7 install, now I get this: > > # rpm -qf

That's problem. AHCI is the standard for SATA, running modern SATA drives, especially SSD require the AHCI command structure. Running modern SATA drives in IDE (ATA) mode is not readily supported. -Jason -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc.

> -----Original Message----- > From: S.Bob > Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 2:52 PM > > > > I get this: > > # rpm -qf `which sendmail` > postfix-2.10.1-7.el7.x86_64 > sendmail-8.14.7-5.el7.x86_64 > yum erase sendmail # undo what you did before... yum reinstall postfix # just in case it is messed up rpm -V postfix # lets verify if postfix is ok systemctl