similar to: Re: STI and Joins Broken

I''ve made a inheritance rework some weeks ago that would possible fix it since it only loads the inheritance support in the class that''ll use it. In STI case, it would load only if the class that descends directly from AR has been inherited and the column specified in the inheritance_column is available. People here told me to wait until next release so we can dig into this, but

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Kevin Clark <kevin.clark at gmail.com> Date: 01-Sep-2006 20:31 Subject: Dealing with exec? To: James Mead <jamesmead44 at gmail.com> Hey James, Sorry to bug you. I was curious how you''d handle a call to exec in a method you were testing. Kernel.stubs(:exec)... doesn''t seem to work but I''m not sure where else an

Anyone know how to stub Kernel#open? I''m trying to mock/stub an open-uri call, but it doesn''t seem to like it. Here''s the test code, and the failures: body = File.open(File.dirname(__FILE__) + ''/../fixtures/google_search_california.html'').read

Right now I''m working on adding tests to a method that looks like this: def get_via_redirect(path, args={}) get path, args follow_redirect! while redirect? status end So, I want to confirm that get is called and that status is returned but I also want to see that when the value of redirect? effects how many times follow_redirect is called. Is there

I''m pushing a major overhaul in testing the Rails codebase. Mocha and stubba make my life easy so that''s what I''m using. The first major patch using them is in RailTies (http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/5970) now. I spoke to DHH today about using it in the other libraries and I think it''ll be ok, but they really want to include as little code as needed. I

This drives me insane on a regular basis. How does one mock system(''blah'') or `blah` ? Adding expectations on Kernel doesn''t do it. Adding expectations on Object just makes me sad: Object.any_instance.expects(:system).with(''ls'') # => #<Mock:0x12b584e>.system(''ls'') - expected calls: 0, actual calls: 1 And this really

Hi guys, I''m running mocha (0.3.2) against Rails core and just found an issue where the mock doesn''t go away after the test is run. For example: def test_reset_bang_doesn_reinstall_named_routes ActionController::Routing::Routes.named_routes.expects(:install).never @session.reset! end def test_zzz puts ActionController::Routing::Routes.named_routes.inspect

Hi Kevin, Not currently, I''m afraid - I always realised it was a possible problem, but we haven''t run into it in our use of Mocha so far. I guess you''re pushing the envelope with it, which is great. If you only need to do it for one or two objects, you could just undefine the offending methods. In the meantime I''ll look into a better solution. It may not be

My question is whether there''s a more idiomatic rails way of structuring this query or of redoing the underlying models. First, the ugly find_by_sql code, which is the method to generate an atom feed: def atom items_per_feed = 15 sql_query = "SELECT activities.*, users.real_name AS real_name, accounts.last_scraped_at AS last_scraped_at,

Hi, Am relatively new to the RoR world. My question is quite simple. I have a query like such: shipmentNumbers = Order.find_by_sql(["select distinct s.id from orders o, line_items li, shipment_lines sl, shipments s where o.number=? and o.id = li.order_id and li.id = sl.line_item_id and sl.shipment_id = s.id", number]) The above query works fine. I wanted to do the same query using

I''ve finally managed to find some time to do some serious work on Mocha. There are some code snippets on my blog (http://blog.floehopper.org/articles/2007/04/12/preview-of-latest-mocha-changes) showing the new functionality available in trunk (revision 128). I don''t don''t know how many people out there are using trunk, but it would be great to get some feedback on these

Everyone, I have two tables (assuming their most logical types): apartments id address bedrooms bathrooms googlemaps_id googlemaps id url the models: class Apartment < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :googlemap end class Googlemap < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :listing end I would like to find_all by searching the attributes in apartment, and also return the google map

Hi All, Is there a way to do join queries with find() or is it best to use find_by_sql() instead? I''m looking to do something like: SELECT winery_name, wine_name FROM winery, wine WHERE wine.winery_id = winery.winery_id AND winery.winery_name LIKE ''Borg%''; Thanks! : ) Jason

I am having trouble generating some of my scaffolding. I''m trying to use PostgreSQL as my back-end. Some of my scaffolding generates with no problem but for other parts I get this: Before updating scaffolding from new DB schema, try creating a table for your model The tables do exist. At least I can see them from psql. Here is the SQL I''m using to create my tables: CREATE

Hello all, I''m having difficulty setting up mocks such that I can verify that Rails was going to render the right template file (for example new.rhtml) and stop Rails from performing the actual rendering. After peeking at Rails'' internals, I tried two techniques as illustrated here: http://pastie.caboo.se/18197 Neither worked. I think the first one failed because Rails

I need to run a sql statement along the lines of SELECT * FROM items WHERE NOT ... But I would like to run this in the ActiveRecord syntax. I like using :conditions => [...] but obviously where it renders ''WHERE NOT'' and not simply ''WHERE''. I''d rather not use find_by_sql if at all possible for security reasons. Anyone know how to do this? Thanks,

I''m working on a fairly complex join query and could use a bit of advice from more expert users of ActiveRecord. I have an events table with quite a lot of data, with has_many relations to categories, age_groups, and event_images. In my first naive implementation, each event had a date, so to load all upcoming events efficiently, I''d do: Event.find(:all,

Is a find_by_sql query cached with memcached and cached_model (http://dev.robotcoop.com/Libraries/)? Looks like the answer is no. Is there a reason for this? I have a lot of very complicated querys with a lot of unions, subquerys and joins that would greatly benefit from the cache. Going through the code I can see that the find_by_sql method is changed in cached_model.rb, but it does not call

I just upgraded to edge rails so I can use the BigDecimal support for monetary calculations. I''ve just come across the following problem.. Right now, I''ve got a content controller which is responsible for updating much of my site''s content. I''ve decided to make this a subclass of Admin, so I can organize my administrative related controllers into their own

which to use? we''re not doing anyting too fancy, though that may change -- we might need rbac in the future. i''m using loging_engine right now, pretty happily, but i came across a blog entry that claims acts_as_authenticated is the latest and greatest. if anyone has some pros and cons to share, i''d appreciate it -- would like to make the correct choice before we launch