similar to: [Community Review] Mirage Incubation Project Proposal

Hi everybody, after the initial positive community review of the http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Mirage_Incubation_Project_Proposal, it is time to have a formal vote. Who can vote? - Project leads of Mature Xen.org projects - Committers of Mature Xen.org projects - Others can register their vote in support of the project, but the vote is not binding. How to vote? - Vote via the voting form at

On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 01:00:23PM +0000, Balraj Singh wrote: > Hi, > > I''m working on verifying TCP checksums on incoming packets in Mirage, but > I''ve run into a bit of a problem. > > If TCP checksum offload is turned on on a virtual interface (this is the > default), and if the TCP connection is local to the machine, it looks like > Xen does not

Hi everybody, the XCI project appears to have been dormant for a while and there is no project lead for XCI today. In line with Xen governance (see phttp://www.xen.org/projects/governance.html), I would like to first get community views on the health of the project and then schedule an archivation review. Let me quote from the process: "The review is essentially a pitch why the

Xen Community, I have a team of people frantically creating manpages for the xe command and all of it''s 361 subcommands. The initial source documentation is in asciidoc but also saved as Docbook. From docbook we transform to epub, html, manpage and pdf. This is currently being hosted in a subversion server at a Seattle area college and we''d like to move it to the xen-org

I''m really interested in openmirage, erlang on xen, mini-os, rump kernels (just saw that today), or anything that runs directly on xen. I think there''s a huge potential and use case with these technologies. I have a random question though. I''ve only seen these type of things running on Xen. Is there any specific reason you don''t see much on KVM? Maybe

Yes it is happening. I sent a mail 2 to the list weeks ago. I sent out a mail earlier today to get input on revised timing. I would try and arrive the evening before or in the early hours of wed 8ish or so Lars Sent from Samsung Mobile -------- Original message -------- From: Ben Guthro <ben@guthro.net> Date: 2013/09/09 18:54 (GMT+00:00) To: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xen.org> Cc:

Hi all, you probably have all heard by now that the Xen Project Advisory Board (a group of vendors who provide funds to the Xen Project that are intended to be used for the good of the community) recently created the Test Framework Working Group.http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/AB_WG/Test_Frameworkcontains more information about the group. The working group had its first meeting a few weeks

In AWDWR David says (pg 232), "When a Join Wants to Be a Model: While a many-to-many relation with attributes can often seem like the obvious choice, it?s often a mirage for a missing domain model. When it is, it can be advantageous to convert this relationship into a real model and decorate it with a richer set of behavior. This lets you accompany the data with methods. As an example,

> On Jun 24, 2020, at 9:53 AM, Nicolai Hähnle via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:40 PM Stella Laurenzo via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> We originally started it as a fork of the LLVM repository, but transitioned to the MLIR standalone template, and we found it more productive to iterate out of tree in

Hi everyone, I need help. I want to have a "uniform" kind distribution. When I used sample function I got almost twice many zeros compared to other numbers. What's wrong with my command ? temp <-sample(0:12, 2000, replace=T,prob=(rep(1/13,13))) hist(temp) Thanks in advance, Taka,

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 01:21:18PM -0700, Eric Christopher wrote: > > On Jul 16, 2012, at 1:17 PM, Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard at amd.com> wrote: > > > I am in favor of this. I think having specific criteria and time lines > > will be beneficial for both maintainers and reviewers. > > > > However, instead of having a separate branch, what do you think

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 9:54 AM Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:40 PM Stella Laurenzo via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > We originally started it as a fork of the LLVM repository, but > transitioned to the MLIR standalone template, and we found it more > productive to iterate out of tree in this fashion,

On Jul 16, 2012, at 1:17 PM, Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard at amd.com> wrote: > I am in favor of this. I think having specific criteria and time lines > will be beneficial for both maintainers and reviewers. > > However, instead of having a separate branch, what do you think about > adding the backend to the main tree, but not building it by default. > This would make it

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:44:25AM -0700, Owen Anderson wrote: > Tom, > > I think it might be productive to fork this thread to discuss making the requirements for upstreaming a new LLVM target more explicit and open. I'd also like to gauge interest in an idea I've discussed privately with a few community members, namely the concept of having a semi-official

I read somewhere recently about problems with Puppet and Ruby 1.9. I''m wondering if this is still an issue? Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For

Michah, On Jul 17, 2012, at 7:53 AM, "Villmow, Micah" <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote: > Owen/Chandler/etc.., > While I have no issue with having a more complete and documented method of submitting backends, the problem is the barrier to entry for some backends is being significantly raised, where they did not exist in the past. In the past AMD has reported issues that we

Per the recent (seeming) consensus regarding incubating new projects under the LLVM organization, I would like to trial the process by requesting to incubate mlir-npcomp <https://github.com/google/mlir-npcomp>. The project is still quite young and has been primarily developed part time by myself and Sean Silva over the last ~2 months. We set it up following discussion of a Numpy/Scipy op set

Hey all, I know you all saw the topic and let out a groan. However, I understand how to get an overhead paging system to work with respect *, however I am now looking for a small(?) paging amp, that I could hook 3 or 4 horns to. I would like to just have the * extention be routed to a soundcard and out an output, so I would like an amp that is voice signal activated. Has anyone found anything

Hi all, please reply to this thread of you have any agenda items that you would like to add. Meeting minutes of past minutes are under * http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Virtualization "Meetings" * The TODO list is under http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Virtualization/Status (just updated it) * Draft roadmap is under "Roadmap" and probably needs

I am attempting to assemble a proposal for a client of mine that is looking to replace their phone system. I think it's a good first installation with 4 POTS incoming and 15 extensions, with an overhead paging system. I also think that it would make a good case for OSS applications in general. Being new to * I have a few more questions, but won?t flood the list with them. I?m not new to