similar to: Network with xen 4.2

Hi, I cannot get my network up in WinXP- and winVISTA-domU''s I need some help, since I got lost in the google-jungle... My system: UBUNTU gutsy gibon-AMD64 on a intel core duo-system. this is my /etc/xen/winxp.cfg: ######### # # Configuration file for the Xen instance debian.qwork.test, created # by xen-tools 3.5 on Sun Mar 16 20:03:26 2008. # # # Kernel + memory size # kernel =

Hi all, I have set up a working OpenVPN2 connection between my Server and my gateway at home. Now I want all traffic to be routed through this VPN connection. Currently everything is going through eth1 to the internet (to the gateway of the University which forwards it to the internet :-). We must use a prox-server and because of this I am not abel to watch the real-Media streams on

Hello, Despite of reading a lot of descriptions I don''t understand the network configuration. I simply have too little experience. I work remote with the machine via ssh. My dom0 is running. I copied an existing installation into a LV and created the following file: # cat /etc/xen/domu-sarge # -*- mode: python; -*- kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-4-xen-686" #kernel =

Hi, I''m using Xen 3.0.3 on two servers with Debian Etch (amd64). These servers have 10 nics (2 onboard and 8 in two 4-port cards) so that every vm can have its own interface. This worked so far with the Xen Version from Etch with a wrapper script wich started 10 bridges at boot time. But now I''ve updated Xen on one of these server to Xen 3.2.0 from backports.org and now the

Hello. I have installed the SuSE Linux 10 XEN kernel but no domU yet. Now I cannot ping to and from dom0. I get lots of ARP broadcasts from dom0 but dom0 seems to ignore ARP answers. When pinging to dom0 it ignores arp requests. This happens regardless xend is running or not. This happens in the xen kernel only, when booting stock kernel all works as expected. What can I do? Robert

I'm sorry to bother you but I'm stuck I can not make a bridge work for me. My current configuration is: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet Hardware Adresse 00:1d:7d:d1:06:bd inet Adresse:192.168.1.1 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Maske:255.255.255.0 inet6-Adresse: fe80::21d:7dff:fed1:6bd/64 G?ltigkeitsbereich:V according to all what I could find in the net. The following should

Hello all, I had setup shorewall before succesfully with a normal LAN to internet connection. Now I''m connected to the internet via VPN and I got problems with configuring Shorewall. Any help is appreciated. This is my setup: - Gentoo Linux laptop (kernel gentoo-dev-sources-2.6.8.1) with Shorewall 2.0.4 (setup for Standalone one interface) and iptables 1.2.11 - VPN client is

Hello @all, thanks for all the helpfull answers in this mailing list. They helped me compiling a new kernel 2.6.10.11 with Xen 2.0.6 (my first one), setting up a dom0 with RAID, LVM and loop devices for domU, integrating a second network as xen-br1 (I''m calling the /etc/xen/scripts/network script from within /etc/init.d/xend to bring up / down the second bridge.) and bootstrapping

In spite of reading howtos and this mailing list now for several weeks, I am still not able to get the network of my winXP guest connected to the host (opensuse 10.2) or the external network. There are some network interfaces missing on my host (peth0, vif0.0). ifconfig: eth0 Protokoll:Ethernet Hardware Adresse 00:18:8B:B3:1A:AC inet Adresse:192.168.0.66 Bcast:192.168.0.255

Hi, I''m working a lot with xen and migration. Now I switched to Xen 4.2 which is really nice. But there is one big problem. A performence issue. I used Xen 4.1 with a networkbridge by using the following line in the vm-config: vif = [ "bridge=eth0,script=vif-bridge" ] In Xen 4.2 this is not possible anymore so that i have entered the following in my /etc/network/interfaces: #

Hi I''m testing around with xen 3.0 snapshot from last week. And i''m now having a problem with a xenbr which is based on a vlan if (dot1q). this is all in dom0 os: debian testing network: tg3 I can start the bridge based on my normal physical eth0 which is working without any problems. My clan without bridge is also working. I can start the bridge based on a vlan if with help

Hi all, After having read most of the available documentation I still have got problems interconnecting two networks in router mode: My configuration consists of two private home networks that I want to connect: Vienna 192.168.0.0/24 - Internet gateway 192.168.0.1 Berlin 192.168.1.0/24 - Internet gateway 192.168.1.1 VPN Devices are configured as 192.168.3.1 (Vienna) and 192.168.3.2

Hi, i allready searched the archives, but found no message that really helps me. i am running debian etch on dom0 and debian sarge on domU. I had a running setup with debain sarge on dom0 before, but now with etch i can not get networking to work in domU. I use routed networking, but the same seems to happen with bridged networking: eth0 within domU is not brought up. I think it maybe related

xm list reveals the following information... Name Id Mem(MB) CPU State Time(s) Console Domain-0 0 315 0 r---- 2058.1 Domain-1 11 342 0 -b--- 5.2 9611 Domain-2 12 342 0 -b--- 3.9 9612 Xen seems to be working beautifully but I have not yet figured out how to get Domain-0 to ping both Domain-1 and Domain-2,

Hi, I have recently updated one of my systems from CentOs 6.4 to CentOS 6.5. This systems is used as a RIPv2 routing server with quagga which is the termination point of some GRE tunnels. While running CentOS 6.4 I see the multicast packages arriving at the eth0 and the GRE tunnel interface. While running under CentOs 6.5 I can see the multicast packages arriving at the eth0 but not on the GRE

hi, i need eth1 for an adsl connection via rp-pppoe (pppd). I was able to hide eth1 in Dom0, but how i use this device in DomU? Do i have to load the 8139too modul, to have eth1 in DomU? cu denny -- Sicherheit verständlich http://www.sides.de GnuPG Key http://pgp.upb.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xAB7D3FE0 _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

Hello everyone! I'm trying to get tinc running, but couldn't make it until now... My current situation is: all tincs are connected, but there ist (almost) no traffic: Only two PCs are able to ping to another, but not to itself. Let me explain, what I'm planning to do: I've got four networks: PROM: 10.69.0.0/16 PAN: 192.168.30.0/24 (I'm afraid, I can't change PAN to

data: > tmp1 Date HrMn Temp Q.4 1 19450101 0900 -37.0 1 2 19450101 1000 -35.9 2 3 19450101 1100 -35.9 3 4 19450101 1200 -36.4 4 5 19450101 1300 -36.4 5 6 19450101 1400 -36.4 6 7 19450101 1500 -36.4 7 8 19450101 1600 -37.5 9 Accidentally, I did this (I meant to write Q.4 instead of Q here) > tmp1$Q[tmp1$Q!="1" & tmp1$Q!= "5"]<-NA I would

Hello there, I'm encountering blocking issues with VMWare Workstation v14/v12 on CentOS 7. The issue is that any Linux guestsystem will get network-disconnected after a short while. I tried w/ brand new guest installs, guests coming from a v12 WS. Tried different guest network settings, I always get disconnected. I found several cases like this on the Web, but couldn't see any working

If you're able to reproduce the infinite loop with -O3 then you should be able to dump out the IR that causes `opt -instcombine` to infloop, unless the bug is truly esoteric (e.g. only caused by a specific use-list ordering). Maybe take a closer look at the output from `opt -print-before-all -O3`? Alternatively you can use bugpoint to minimize the IR to get a small reproducer that causes