similar to: [samba4] crash of winbind after "ls -l /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol"

Hmm… I see that there is a patch in the bugzilla page for that bug. I guess I could try that one… :-) I notice in the patch that there is a lot of talk about SMB2 - we use SMB3 mostly now. But perhaps there is some code sharing? Or perhaps SMB2 is used when talking to the AD servers? Or the few SMB2-talking clients causes the problem for all of the other users? When testing the “timeout” issue I

On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 10:53:17AM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 09:23:34AM +0000, Rowland penny wrote: > > OK, here is the output: > > Can you try the attached (UNTESTED!) patch? > > Thanks, Gna, should have at least compiled it.... New patch :-) Volker -- SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax:

On 01/03/16 21:35, Garming Sam wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > This new segfault seems unrelated to the previous one. It's probably > something like a double free, which typically shouldn't be that hard to > fix. If you try running the tool under valgrind, it should provide > enough information to fix the issue. > > > Cheers, > > Garming > Who or what is

I've got a CTDB 2.5.2 Samba 4.1.5 cluster where I'm seeing smbd processes using too much CPU after the client connection is closed. Doing a truss against the smbd processes shows nothing during this time, so no syscalls seem to be involved. I rebuilt with debug enabled and took stack traces from an offending process spaces about 1 minute apart. Can anyone from the team tell me if

Hello guys, I am using PAM (0.82) to authenticate (samba) workgroup users and it works fine (pam_smbpass). But after joining a domain and start using pam_winbind too, pwauth (2.3.10) get a segmentation fault when trying to authenticate any workgroup or domain user. What happens is that it does authenticate the user successfully, but when it calls pam_end() to release its resources, it crashes.

On 04/03/16 09:58, Volker Lendecke wrote: > On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 10:53:17AM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 09:23:34AM +0000, Rowland penny wrote: >>> OK, here is the output: >> Can you try the attached (UNTESTED!) patch? >> >> Thanks, > Gna, should have at least compiled it.... > > New patch :-) > > Volker > Sorry

On 02/03/16 00:44, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:11:15PM +0000, Rowland penny wrote: >> On 01/03/16 21:35, Garming Sam wrote: >>> Hi Rowland, >>> >>> This new segfault seems unrelated to the previous one. It's probably >>> something like a double free, which typically shouldn't be that hard to >>> fix. If you try

I've read the documentation that domain trusts should be fully supported with both Kerberos and NTLM authentication. I've created a new 2016 domain on a Windows box and created a Samba domain on a Linux box with a BIND9_DLZ backend. Both servers can resolve both DNS domains forwards and backwards and I am able to connect a Windows 10 client to the Samba domain without any issues. The

Hi Rowland >Hi Marcio, we would need more info, where are you migrating the home folders from ? and where to ? I copied Windows Server 2008 folders and permissions with ROBOCOPY to my Samba 4 server. >I know you mentioned a Win 2008 server, are the home folders stored on that ? The personal folders were stored on it (Windows), but now they are on my new Samba 4 file server. >Another

On Mon Jul 31 11:17:57 2023 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Jul 31 03:00:37 2023 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On 30/07/2023 22:24, Mark Foley via samba wrote: > > > That gave me: > > > > > > # host -t A 0d2a3ba9-4ade-45de-85c7-321ba69caee0._msdcs.hprs.local > > > host:

On Tue, 28 May 2019 11:04:01 +0200 Denis Cardon <dcardon at tranquil.it> wrote: > Hi Mark, > > > Because of other issues using ADUC, I tried to remove a domain member using: > > > >> samba-tool group removemembers "Domain Computers" MARKA\$ > > Removed members from group Domain Computers > > > > As shown, it say it "Removed

On Jul 24 13:30:11 2023 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 24/07/2023 17:46, Mark Foley via samba wrote: > > I removed the new computer from the domain and deleted the smb.conf file. I then > > did: > > > > samba-tool domain join hprs.local DC --option='idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes' -U Administrator [deleted] > It sounds

Hai Christian, > Can someone reproduce this? No, tried, but sorry, works fine for me on my 4.11.6 server. And what is you try it like this. samba-tool dns add dc1.zone1.domain.de 0.168.192.in-addr.arpa 157 PTR zone1.domain.de -U Administrator samba-tool dns add dc1.zone1.domain.de 1.168.192.in-addr.arpa 157 PTR zone2.domain.de -U Administrator I tested on my production where i have 6

Hi Team, Issue :- I am not able to access samba share on windows client machine with domain name but able to access with IP Further Details:- We had 2 old samba 3.6.6 setup on hp-ux 11iv3, configured as Active Directory member server, We upgraded both hp-ux samba to 4.9.0 version. For a week both setup works fine, In which we were able to access share of both hp-ux machines by domain name from

On Wednesday, 27 May 2020 16:21:31 PDT Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 12:54:49PM -0700, Alexey A Nikitin via samba wrote: > > 3. Are the rules for how a DC gets put into NEG_CONN_CACHE documented anywhere besides the code itself, or wading through the code is my only option of getting to know the criteria? > > Only in the code I think, added in: > >

Hi everyone, I am looking at a way to easily trace ldap queries to easily single out computers that have buggy software that download the whole AD (like a getent passwd with winbind enum users = yes for example). Increasing the debug level to 5 gives me the result I am looking for, however it is very very talkative and it fills up the log partition way too fast. I wanted to try to single out one

Hi everybody, for some time now I have an issue with our samba/bind9-DLZ setup which became worse lately. I use the RSAT DNS tool to configure DNS records. In the past it sometimes happened, that DNS died when accessing the domain zone. This condition could only be resolved by restarting samba on the affected DC. Unfortunately the situation got worse and configuration/modification of entries

Hello, I'm faced with an issue that I tried to solve myself for some time, but i'm now totally clueless, hence requesting your help. I have a Samba4 running on a CentOS 7 server. >From Windows 10 client, it's working great (except I'm seeing some core dumps from time to time), I can authenticate and access to the server and browse the shared folder. The problem appears when

In samba 4 log I get the following message: [2013/04/29 00:44:30,? 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:369(binary_smbd_main) ? samba version 4.1.0pre1-GIT-5727bfa started. ? Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2013 [2013/04/29 00:44:31,? 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:475(binary_smbd_main) ? samba: using 'standard' process model [2013/04/29 00:44:32,? 1]

Hi all, on a recently installed samba file server, the winbind service crashes apparently randomly. Every few hours it's necessary to restart the winbind service and then it works for a few more hours. Any ideas are welcome. 1) the environment: 2 debian stretch DC's with round-robind bind+dhcp with dns-update. 1 fileserver also (AD backend) on debian stretch. All on self compiled samba