similar to: Wrong local DNS responses from samba4

Hi: I've just configured a Samba 4 install as an AD DC, following the Wiki page at https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_HOWTO I've successfully joined a few machines to the domain, and am now trying to add some simple shares. When I add a share to smb.conf, it appears on client machines via \\domain.example.com\sharename but trying to open any shares gives the error

>From the latest samba4 git HEAD, I was trying to run samba_upgradeprovision, but didn't see it in /sbin/ (Actually, I saw an older version that wasn't working due to new python imports). I've tried completely reinstalling (using git clean -x -f -d; make clean), though I don't see /sbin/samba_upgradeprovision Is this tool no longer installed? (Should I file a bug against the

I tried building the latest master from git on debian wheezy. It seems to require libncurses-dev. I thought to add it into the wiki as a required package to install, but it seems one needs to ask for a login to the wiki. No prob ;) Could someone add it to the wiki? Or is this an unintentional dependency that will be removed? -- Michael De Groote ICT-coordinator Sint-Pietersschool Korbeek-Lo

I've just configured Samba4 on Ubuntu (4.0.0+dfsg1-1), and can't seem to get roaming profiles working (I followed the guide at https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_HOWTO ) 1. Logons work just fine. 2. DNS is configured and working, running through SAMBA_INTERNAL 3. Clients can talk to the server and see/access shares at \\server.corp.domain.com 4. Clients are all Windows 8 and NTP

I'm running samba4 as an AD DC, built from git (built ~3 days ago), with about ~20 Windows 8 clients. I've noticed a number of errors in the logs, pasted below. That group of errors repeats pretty consistently for a lot of different client machines. [2013/09/08 08:12:14.539679, 2] ../source3/smbd/reply.c:592(reply_special) netbios connect: name1=SERVER-NAME 0x20

I'm trying to use a DNS server independent from Samba (non BIND, on a different machine/system). Beyond the two simple records of: SRV _ldap._tcp.samdom.example.com and SRV _kerberos._udp.samdom.example.com If I maintain all the A records for individual hosts (& the server.samdom.example.com machine), should that work? Are there any other special / SRV records that Samba4's

Hi, yes, it is. Anyway, below are some of the diagnostics I have tried. Linux box Win95 Box ========= =========== hostname: saturn tempest ip: 192.168.0.2 192.168.0.1 Below are the diagnostics that I have tried and I ahve logged them: 1. From

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 21:28:19 +0100 Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > Am 04.03.19 um 21:18 schrieb Mark Foley via samba: > >> It shouldn't, you normally only have one gateway, it is by definition > >> the 'gateway' to the WAN & internet, so I would use the same one on all > >> your machines. > > > > The LAN host

Hi: I've been trying to set up external password sync to Google Apps -- and went so far as to write a script, before realizing "unix password sync" and "passwd program" etc., don't seem to be working in samba 4.2.0 rc2 in AD DC mode. I also stumbled on this prior list posting saying unix password sync doesn't work -- though the MAN pages suggest this is supported:

Hi everybody, I read about the development state ... samba as an ad domain controller and that many functions / group policies have been implemented. Still, there is some work in progress. Is there a documentation where I can look up the functions not implemented yet? Regards, Ulrich Schneider

Hi I'm sorry. I mailed the same question again. because, it cannot be yet solved. any ideas with asterisk? [Aug 20 14:40:12] WARNING[29315]: chan_sip.c:11806 check_auth: username mismatch, have <aaaa>, digest has aaaa at 192.168.0.1[Aug 20 14:40:12] NOTICE[29315]: chan_sip.c:20479 handle_request_register: Registration from 'aaaa <sip:aaaa at 192.168.0.1>' failed for

On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 09:47:05 -0800, "Sam Leffler" <sam@errno.com> said: > >> Add a new config option IPSEC_FILTERGIF to control whether or not >> packets coming out of a GIF tunnel are re-processed by ipfw, >> et. al. By default they are not reprocessed. With the option they >> are. > > This may affect your ipfw/ipf rules. If you are happy with

Hi, I have the following setup. Two linux systems with two [test] external interfaces encrypted with ipsec [transport]. Two gre tunnels that pass 10.200.0.0/24 and 10.200.1.0/24 network traffic. Testing the balanced tunnels I would setup iptraf on one and ping from the other. The results would be as expected; traffic would be split between the two interfaces. Testing with an ftp transfer of

Hi all, After having read most of the available documentation I still have got problems interconnecting two networks in router mode: My configuration consists of two private home networks that I want to connect: Vienna 192.168.0.0/24 - Internet gateway 192.168.0.1 Berlin 192.168.1.0/24 - Internet gateway 192.168.1.1 VPN Devices are configured as 192.168.3.1 (Vienna) and 192.168.3.2

Hi, I have established two connections to the same ISP. After that ip route list showed this: 195.14.247.94 dev ppp0 proto kernel scope link src 81.173.141.207 195.14.247.94 dev ppp1 proto kernel scope link src 81.173.237.84 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.1 default via 195.14.247.94 dev ppp0 I want 192.168.0.2 to connect to the internet by ppp1 and all

Hi , I am using Mandrake 7.2 and trying to install samba to share my linux hard disk with Windows 98 ... Herewith my config and diagonstics : bigserver <------------> aclient runing : mandrake 7.2 Win98 Ip Addr.: 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.2 password encrypted activated activated - ping commands work fine on both ways, so my Tcp/ip

Hi, I would like to ask how exactly the "password server =" smb.conf option works. The man pages say that the option is to "restrict Samba to to do all its username/password validation using a specific remote server" I know that we should normally leave it empty, to have samba auto-discover the DCs. But my question is: Suppose it's defined it like: > password

Etx1 - First Internet Line - eth0 Ext2 - Second Internet line - eth2 LAN - Local Area Network - eth1 Other traffic - Ext1 -------+-------+--------------- Ext2 ---Web goes Here eth0 | |eth2 +-------+-------+ | ROUTER | +----+------+---+ |eth1 192.168.0.0/24 -----------------+ | 192.168.0.1/24------------------- - Gateway |

After provisioning and testing my new DC offline, I now want to move it into production. This means changing IPs. DC FQDN: mail.hprs.local IPs for setup/testing: DC: 192.168.1.60 Gateway: 192.168.1.1 (Netgear router) DNS: 192.168.1.60 (/etc/resolv.conf) /etc/hosts: 192.168.1.60 mail.hprs.local mail smb.conf, dns forwarder: 192.168.1.1 Production IPs: DC: 192.168.0.2 Gateway:

On Sat Jan 20 16:28:14 2024 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 20 Jan 2024 15:44:18 -0500 > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > After provisioning and testing my new DC offline, I now want to move > > it into production. This means changing IPs. > > > > DC FQDN: mail.hprs.local > >