Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "CentOS 6.4 kickstart bonding"
2015 Jun 25
1
Possible bug in kickstart
Hello All,
I seem to have run into a bug with the new --bridgeslaves=<INTERFACE> option. It would seem that if I tell the bridge device to use a virtual interface (like bond0) rather than a physical interface (em1/em2) that kickstart completely barfs on it. I have provided my network section below which works fine as long as i don't enable all the bridge content.
When the
2013 Mar 19
0
kickstart bonding
Hello!
I would like to use the new bonding feature of kickstart in release 6.4.
My setup is one bonding interface (bond0) with two (eth0, eth1)
ethernet cards. I am using two VLANs on bonding interface so I have no
IP for bond0 but have IPs for bond0.1 and bond0.2. If I create config
by hand it works.
Now I would like to convert my kickstart file using the new bonding
feature. The kickstart
2017 Apr 18
2
anaconda/kickstart: bonding device not created as expected
Hi,
I am currently struggling with the right way to configure a bonding
device via kickstart (via PXE).
I am installing servers which have "eno" network interfaces. Instead of
the expected bonding device with two active slaves (bonding mode is
balance-alb), I get a bonding device with only one active slave and an
independent, non-bonded network device. Also the bonding device
2013 Oct 08
2
C6: kickstart problems with additional repo
Hi,
I'm kickstarting a vm in ESXi 5.1.
ks.cfg is on floppy, install media is ISO file.
This works great as long as I don't add an additional repo, in our case
it is vmware tools on one of our webservers.
If I add the repo line, anaconda asks then for the used network card and
indeed, switching to console the interfaces are still unconfigured.
Chosing eth0 in gui continues the
2013 Nov 15
3
CentOS 6 : Network Interface Naming
Hello All,
I have one CentOS 6 KVM virtualization server that I built around a year
ago (best I can tell it was in October 2012) at which time I would have
been installing 6.3 [0]. That particular install used the Consistent
Network Device Naming [1] conventions (PCIe NICs are p1p1, p1p2).
I started to build out a new KVM virt server (kickstarting a 6.4 install
now as compared to 6.3 back then)
2008 Mar 31
9
iSCSI root on Dom0
I am getting the following error on boot on a new install Centos 51:
#/bin/sh ro no such file or directory
then a kernel panic
I have traced it to the call ''switchroot'' in the init script in the initrd.
the exact same build without zen has no problems.
the boot messages look like:
Attaching to iSCSI storage
iscsistart: transport class version 2.0-724. iscsid version 2.0-865
2012 Jun 29
5
assign object with loop (translation from SAS to R)
I have a dataset named DM with p1, p2, ...., p9 (9 columns, numerical values)
I would like to calculate to multify each pair of columns (p1p2, p1p3,...
p1p9, p2p3, p2p4.... p8p9) and assign them in p1p2, p1p3,... p1p9, p2p3,
p2p4.... p8p9
In SAS,
l=0;
p_int_sum=0;
do i=1 to 8;
do j=(i+1) to 9;
l=l+1;
p{i}p{j}=p{i}*p{j};
end;
end;
I would like to know how to assign them in R
I tried for
2012 Jun 07
1
Worrying after IPv6 day...
Hi,
after IPv6 day, I was wondering if our server were really secure...
And, I know we should switch on IPv6 everywhere but... it will take some time.
Usually, we disable(d) IPv6; so we are not running ip6tables.
Can I start ip6tables in all cases (even if only IPv4) just to be on the safe side?
On CentOS 6 servers, I use the --noipv6 in the kickstart files and I removed NetworkManager; but
2016 Aug 14
5
tcpdump loses lots of packets
Hi folks,
I've got a Dell R320 running CentOS 7, and a 10G NIC. I'm running a DNS
server on it, for testing. As part of my testing, I'm attempting to
capture all the DNS queries arriving on the server, using tcpdump.
However, tcpdump's performance is abysmal, and it loses lots of the
packets. Here's the output when I stop the capture:
# tcpdump -nn -i p1p1 -w
2016 Aug 25
1
dracut-initqueue timeout with virt-install... but it works (kinda?)
Hello,
I?m using virt-install to build a guest system with CentOS. The system boots up, times out with dracut-initqueue timeout and drops me into an emergency shell. If I exit the shell the install continues and I get a working machine.
Any ideas?
virt-install \
-n TEST \
-r 8192 \
--os-type=linux \
--disk=/vm-images/test.img,device=disk,bus=virtio,size=100,format=raw \
2017 Mar 29
0
Mixed bonding and vlan on plain adapter possible?
Hello,
I have a CentOS 7.3 + updates server where my configuration arises from the
need to connect via iSCSI to a Dell PS Series storage array and Dell not
supporting bonding.
So that I need to use 2 nics on the same vlan to connect to iSCSI portal IP
and then use multipath.
Also, the iSCSI lan is on a dedicated vlan
I have only these 2 x 10Gbit adapters and I also need to put other vlans on
them
2009 Apr 05
5
Headless operations
Hi Folks,
I'm interested in "headless" installation. If I use GRUB, then I provide
arguments to the kernel of things like "headless vnc vncpassword=whoopie
ip=dhcp" GRUB passes this on to ISOLinux, which manages the CD and
subsequently the installation.
Shouldn't I be able to do exactly the same thing with EXTLinux? I ask,
because, as you might suspect, I
2013 Apr 03
9
VERY odd HTTP Packet Loss
I''m running Xen 4.1.4 on Fedora 17.
I have some CentOS 6 DomUs - an haproxy machine and some tomcat VMs.
When clients send requests with:
POST /ProposalInterface HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: text/xml
Host: www.myhost.co.uk
Content-Length: 2099
Expect: 100-continue
Connection: Keep-Alive
The "continuation" doesn''t happen. The POST is truncated at 1449 bytes,
and the
2013 Nov 21
2
Query:: Reg: Libvirt Networking
Currently, I have two networks configured via xml:
virsh # net-dumpxml TestNetwork1
<network connections='2'>
<name>TestNetwork1</name>
<uuid>a76f665a-0196-4edb-81b4-340944a6869c</uuid>
<forward dev='p1p1' mode='nat'>
<nat>
<port start='1024' end='65535'/>
</nat>
<interface
2015 Feb 25
0
Kickstart with multiple eth devices
Ok, so some of this now works, but I'm still having problems. With the
bootif option, the system now correctly configures and uses the same
interface to get its kickstart file. However, when the system is done and
boots up, the interfaces are still messed up. So this is what I have in the
kickstart file:
# On-Board Port 1 with public IP configuration
network --noipv6 --onboot yes --bootproto
2013 Jul 04
5
Syslinux 5.11-pre7 not working
Hi,
I am a happy user of version 4.06 and have been hoping to upgrade the 5.x series (for the HTTP bits).
I have the following problems with the 5.11-pre7 build:
1. TFTP load is horribly slow ... even when the two REAL machines are connected to the same switch.
For a typical RHEL installation, the vmlinuz loads ... the initrd.img loads very very slowly and just times out (I waited over 10 mins)
2009 May 27
3
Menus, choices and optional parameters
Hi all,
I'm in need of creating a simple menu where two options must be available:
1) (default) Boot from local harddrive
2) start installation
2) option should display a simple text disclaimer and if agreed it then
would ask for a number from 32 to 254 which is then appended to one of
commandline parameters.
I have quite a lot of experience with [sys|pxe|iso]linux and some
programming
2015 Feb 25
2
Kickstart with multiple eth devices
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 23/02/15 08:16 PM, Steven Tardy wrote:
>
>> On Feb 23, 2015, at 6:34 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner
>> <ashley at pcraft.com> wrote:
>>
>> I have a Dell server that has two built-in ethernet devices. When
>> I kickstart the machine, they are correctly identified as eth0
>> and eth1 (correctly meaning they
2014 Aug 15
3
testing out 6.03 network booting... (6.03-pre19)
>
> We are not ready for "prime-time" though.
> Using the "lpxelinux.0" file from 6.03-pre19 ...
>
> My RHEL5 installs, when using the "http://" for kernel, initrd and append lines, seem to be hitting some sort of parameter length limit.
> The culprit seems to be the long "append" line.
>
> The same append line, when NOT using
2016 Mar 18
2
Networking in KVM
Paul,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote:
> On 17/03/16 04:47 PM, paul.greene.va at verizon.net wrote:
> > Thanks, I followed the 2nd article, and it got the existing virtual
> > machines communicating with each other.
>
Right, so your VMs are on the same bridge group now (at Layer2 of OSI).
> >
> > However, any new