similar to: any available asynchronous dce rpc library?

It's now available from Macmillan Technical Publishing. The only source of information publicly available on Windows NT authentication and password-update methods, including NTLMv1, NTLMv2, NTLMSSP, the Domain Logon Protocol (NETLOGON and NETLOGON "Secure Channel"), Windows 95 user, NT user and NT Administrative password changes, and how the SAM database is encrypted when

Hello, with OpenSSH_2.3.0p1 running in HP-UX 11.00 I noticed that the "SD commands" (like "swcopy") produce the following error when being logged in via SSH: ERROR: RPC exception: "Who are you failed (dce / rpc)" 11/29/00 11:20:18 MET Ideas? Regards, Ulrich P.S. Not subscribed to the list

These are already open. I'm pretty sure that NT4/2003 PDC's make a DCE/RPC over TCP connection to pull down the <1b> entries from the wins server. I have done packet captures on test NT4 wins server to see how PDC's pull their domain lists, and I see the port 135 three way handshake, which then gets switched over to a tcp port 1028 which is the dce/rpc requests and responses.

I''ve run across a weird problem with RJS that I''m trying to figure out: I have an application that was running 0.13.1 that I recently upgraded to Rails 1.0. I wanted to use RJS templates, so I installed the plugin and updated my prototype javascript file via ''rake update_prototype.'' I attempted to test the templates out via the following code, but the AJAX

Hi, I wrote an IR pass and it adds some instructions that are not used. For example: %1 = call i64 @foo() When %1 is not used at all. I thought that running DCE (-dce) or DIE (-die) after my pass will remove such instructions, but it didn't. Why? And is there a way to do that? Thanks, Tehila. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

i've been examining the DCE/RPC over SMB Trans pipes, and i have to say that i'm quite impressed with the design: my compliments to the NT team. i find it quite an agreeable challenge working out the bits that are (and are not) decoded by NETMON.EXE. there are a couple of niggling things, about which absolutely nothing can be done, but i thought i'd mention them anyway: - the

Hi, We are having problems setting up a squid cache server to use NTLMv2 authentication to authenticate users against AD. We have narrowed the problems down to being a problem between samba and squid when using NTLMv2. It constantly moans about the password being wrong when using squid, but doing a direct samba auth works fine. We have (believedly) narrowed it down to this: the domain requires

Hello my goal is to write an authentication module for the Symfony php framework, which would provide SSO capabilities to browsers that are logged in an MS AD domain and support the NTLMv2 protocol. Ideally this module would run on linux servers, and be portable, i.e. require as few non-php tools and network/firewall settings as possible (that's why I eschewed the existing Apache modules

I'm pleased to see that the new release has full support for asynchronous I/O. I was surprised, though, since I thought that the aio bug in the 2.4 kernels couldn't be fixed without breaking binary compatibility. Was there a special fix for this in the RHEL3 update 4 kernel? Anyway, thanks for all your efforts. We're looking forward to testing aio with the new version next week.

I searched google and did not find any hits on this being solved. I want to get ssh so I can the dsa/rsa style password it in an environment that uses dfs/dce authentication if that is possible (and it has not already been solved). In other words, I want to be able to log into a host as a dfs/dce user without typing my password. Before I dig into the code and trying to do this, I wanted

If I have: %x = call @externalFunc ... ; other codes where %x is not used ret ; assume void function and use dce optimization, will the call gets eliminated? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/DCE-and-external-function-tp29932485p29932485.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445 ------- Additional Comments From simon at sxw.org.uk 2003-05-21 00:49 ------- The existing code only handles the situation where Kerberos credentials are created by the OpenSSH's krb5 code. What would appear to be happening under OSF/1 is that one of the calls used to verify the users login is, as a by-product, creating the credentials

> only if the compiler can prove that the called function has > no side effects (such as modifying some global variables or > causing the program to exit). can it prove if the function resides in a shared library? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/DCE-and-external-function-tp29932485p29942236.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi leledumbo, > If I have: > > %x = call @externalFunc > ... ; other codes where %x is not used > ret ; assume void function > > and use dce optimization, will the call gets eliminated? only if the compiler can prove that the called function has no side effects (such as modifying some global variables or causing the program to exit). Ciao, Duncan.

Hi, On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi leledumbo, > >> If I have: >> >> %x = call @externalFunc >> ... ; other codes where %x is not used >> ret ; assume void function >> >> and use dce optimization, will the call gets eliminated? > > only if the compiler can prove that the called function has

Thanks Also I found that some cases are also caught by a specialized routine to remove dead loops which is missing the case I noticed. odavd From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org<mailto:dberlin at dberlin.org>> Date: Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 8:45 PM To: David Callahan <dcallahan at fb.com<mailto:dcallahan at fb.com>>, LLVM Dev Mailing list <llvm-dev at

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > > > Any insight, feedback into this issue would be much appreciated. > > The squid program does this. Maybe look into the code they > use for their integration ? > > http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Authenticate/Ntlm Jeremy, thanks! That's exactly what I was looking at. So

I have been looking at some internal codes looking for differences between Clang (specifically 3.7.1) and gcc (typically 4.8.1 but sometimes later). One area where I bumped into was dead code elimination in the presence of complex control flow. I note that the “aggressive dead code elimination” (ADCE.cpp) treats all branch operations as live (isa<TerminatorInst>(I)). Doing more requires

On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:21 PM, leledumbo <leledumbo_cool at yahoo.co.id> wrote: > >> only if the compiler can prove that the called function has >> no side effects (such as modifying some global variables or >> causing the program to exit). > > can it prove if the function resides in a shared library? Only if the right function attributes are added. See

In practice, APT is not faster to build than rdf. The df calculator we use is linear time and quite fast. Updating is also pretty trivial since it's only deletes of dead and unreachable code. So anything it reached can be replaced with undef in most cases. Cd-dce is not slower in GCC than dce On Fri, Jan 29, 2016, 8:31 PM David Callahan <dcallahan at fb.com> wrote: > I think you