similar to: NWFilter and IPv6

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1100 matches similar to: "NWFilter and IPv6"

2020 Jan 01
2
Passing multiple addresses with masks to nwfilter
Hello, I have a nwfilter that I'm using to ensure that libvirt domains can't spoof IPv6 traffic. It looks like this: <filter name='no-ipv6-spoofing' chain='ipv6-ip' priority='-710'> <rule action='return' direction='out' priority='500'> <ipv6 srcipaddr='$IPV6' srcipmask='$IPV6MASK'/> </rule>
2020 Jan 01
0
Re: Passing multiple addresses with masks to nwfilter
Looking at https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html/virtualization_deployment_and_administration_guide/sect-virtual_networking-applying_network_filtering#sect-Applying_network_filtering-Usage_of_variables_in_filters, it sounds like the preferred approach is to use something like: <filter name='no-ipv6-spoofing' chain='ipv6-ip'
2018 Mar 29
1
nwfilter multiple IPs
I'm trying to apply a nwfilter rule for two networks on the same guest interface, like so: ~ # virsh nwfilter-dumpxml 1081532-private-both <filter name='1081532-private-both' chain='root'> <uuid>16004b94-2b62-4568-9467-169908eb4040</uuid> <rule action='accept' direction='in' priority='500'> <ip
2018 Nov 08
0
Problems getting nwfilter to work
Hi folks, I'm using libvirt 3.9.0 running under CentOS 7.5. I want the guests, which are all within the same subnet (e.g. 10.0.0.x.), only talk to their default gateway (e.g. 10.0.0.1) but to each other. This is caused by a design issue of our network platform. I set up a filter rule and attached it to the interface of a guest using nwfilter-define: <filter name='private_ip'
2019 Jun 03
1
Easy solution for custom firewall rules-
Nakta wrote: > libvirts nwfilter module can achieve that. I read over those resources and I did what I thought would be correct, but it's not having any effect. I created a new nwfilter like this: <filter name='allow-virbr2-vpn' chain='ipv4' priority='-700'> <rule action='accept' direction='in' priority='500'> <all
2013 Jul 08
6
Getting nwfilter to work on Debian Wheezy
Hi, I'm trying to configure nwfilter for KVM, but so far I haven't managed to figure out a working configuration. Network setup: The dom0 (Debian 7.1, kernel 3.2.46-1, libvirt 0.9.12) is connected via eth0, part of the external subnet 192.168.17.0/24, and has an additional subnet 192.168.128.160/28 routed to its main address 192.168.17.125. The host's subnet is configured as bridge
2011 Jan 19
1
Getting CPU and memory usage statistics for the host
Hi, I have noticed that virt-manager has the ability to show me the current cpu- and memory-usage of both the host and running guest machines. How does it do that? I could make good use of that information myself in the client applications I'm writing, however, from what I can see on http://libvirt.org/html/libvirt-libvirt.html, I have no idea how to go about getting it from libvirt. In
2011 Feb 18
0
altering virtual network driver iptables behavior
I have the need to modify the behavior of the virtual network driver's behavior and how it deals with routed networks. I'm running libvirt-0.8.3-2.fc14. According to http://libvirt.org/firewall.html, the following is automatically added to the FORWARD chain of iptables when a network type of "routed" is started up: "Allow inbound, but only to our expected subnet.
2018 Jul 02
1
Re: East-west traffic network filter
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 3:40 AM Thiago Oliveira <cpv.thiago@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ales, > > I would like to prevent the guests from different subnets start a > communication. In other words I have the subnet 192.168.1.0/24 and > 192.168.2.0/24 and the guests from 192.168.1.0/24 cannot reach/talk with > guests on 192.168.2.0/24 at the same host. Is this possible using a
2018 Apr 02
0
Re: Possible to edit/apply nwfilter at runtime?
On 03/30/2018 04:29 PM, Andre Goree wrote: > On 2018/02/16 12:12 pm, Daniel P. Berrang? wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:59:42AM -0500, Andre Goree wrote: >>> I'm trying to determine if it's possible to edit/attach/apply >>> nwfilter rules >>> at runtime?? I.e., after a VM is already running, can I apply a >>> nwfilter to >>> the VM
2019 May 07
0
Re: disable libvirt-nwfilter
[Please keep the list CC-ed as it may help somebody from future when searching for solution to the same problem] On 5/6/19 6:08 PM, nakata@geekpit.org wrote: > Am 2019-05-06 16:26, schrieb Michal Privoznik: >> On 5/6/19 3:44 PM, nakata@geekpit.org wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> i want to disable the nwfilter functionality of libvirt. >>> It's surely nice
2019 May 06
2
disable libvirt-nwfilter
Hi, i want to disable the nwfilter functionality of libvirt. It's surely nice for some people, nevertheless i don't want libvirt to alter any netfilter rules, neither i want the according functionality even available. I know about nwfilter-undefine, but what i'm looking for is an option to globally disable this functionality at all. Some config flag or similar. How can i achieve
2018 Feb 16
1
Re: Possible to edit/apply nwfilter at runtime?
On 2018/02/16 12:12 pm, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:59:42AM -0500, Andre Goree wrote: >> I'm trying to determine if it's possible to edit/attach/apply nwfilter >> rules >> at runtime? I.e., after a VM is already running, can I apply a >> nwfilter to >> the VM and have it work without rebooting the machine? Thus far, I've
2018 Feb 16
3
Possible to edit/apply nwfilter at runtime?
I'm trying to determine if it's possible to edit/attach/apply nwfilter rules at runtime? I.e., after a VM is already running, can I apply a nwfilter to the VM and have it work without rebooting the machine? Thus far, I've not come across a way to do so, but I thought I'd ask here before I chase my tail around Google. Thanks! -- Andre Goree -=-=-=-=-=- Email - andre at
2014 Mar 26
1
Recreating nwfilter rules without a restart
Let's say I have some iptables rules defined to restrict guest traffic. If I restart the hosts firewall 'service iptables restart', all the guest-specific rules get blown away. Is there a way to reapply all the guest firewall rules, without restarting each individual guest? It looks like if I edit a nwfilter with `virsh nwfilter-edit` it goes and reapplies the rules to all the
2018 Feb 16
0
Re: Possible to edit/apply nwfilter at runtime?
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:59:42AM -0500, Andre Goree wrote: > I'm trying to determine if it's possible to edit/attach/apply nwfilter rules > at runtime? I.e., after a VM is already running, can I apply a nwfilter to > the VM and have it work without rebooting the machine? Thus far, I've not > come across a way to do so, but I thought I'd ask here before I chase my
2011 Dec 10
0
Issues with nwfilter rules
Hi All, I have two kvm guests running with a bridged configuration bound separately to br0 and br1 on my Fedora 15 host. I'm attempting to create some nwfilter rules on br1 and am running into a bunch of problems that have me scratching my head. libvirt version: 0.8.8-7 What I've noticed on the second host is as follows: - Most all nwfilter rules that I create for the host on br1
2015 May 01
1
libvirt nwfilter
To take advantage of the filters, is it as simple as adding these couple of lines in a guest's xml file like the example from https://libvirt.org/formatnwfilter.html#nwfconcepts ? <devices> <interface type='bridge'> <mac address='00:16:3e:5d:c7:9e'/> <filterref filter='clean-traffic'> <parameter name='IP'
2018 Mar 30
2
Re: Possible to edit/apply nwfilter at runtime?
On 2018/02/16 12:12 pm, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:59:42AM -0500, Andre Goree wrote: >> I'm trying to determine if it's possible to edit/attach/apply nwfilter >> rules >> at runtime? I.e., after a VM is already running, can I apply a >> nwfilter to >> the VM and have it work without rebooting the machine? Thus far, I've
2014 May 28
0
Re: nwfilter usage
On 5/28/2014 10:10 AM, Laine Stump wrote: > On 05/27/2014 02:46 AM, Brian Rak wrote: >> Make sure you have: >> >> /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables = 1 > That doesn't make sense. bridge-nf-call-iptables controls whether or not > traffic going across a Linux host bridge device will be sent through > iptables, but the rules created by nwfilter are applied