similar to: Unable to start guest

Hi Sebastian, It boils down to this: The previous heuristic solver could return infinite cost solutions in some rare cases (despite finite-cost solutions existing). The new solver is still heuristic, but it should always return a finite cost solution if one exists. It does this by avoiding early reduction of infinite spill cost nodes via R1 or R2. To illustrate why the early reductions can be a

Hi, I have an problem that I can''t get resolved. I have an hash like www.krzywanski.net/archives/703. With this hash i whould like the add some extra hashes before passing to the module, i have tryed the code below. node testnode { class { ''testclass'': nodes_data => { ''node1'' => { ''server'' =>

Hi All, has anyone run into maximum depth of nested JSON arrays in either rjson or RJSONIO ? I seem to be able to get up to 10 depth levels without problem, but crossing over to 11 either causes an error or fails to load the nodes properly. with RJSONIO I tried: a = fromJSON('data/myJSON.json', depth=1000) but I still get this error: Error in fromJSON(content, handler, default.size,

On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 13:28 +1100, Lang Hames wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > It boils down to this: The previous heuristic solver could return > infinite cost solutions in some rare cases (despite finite-cost > solutions existing). The new solver is still heuristic, but it should > always return a finite cost solution if one exists. It does this by > avoiding early reduction of

Hi Sebastian, > I think the crucial point is that node4 isn't aware of its own > restriction (after the first R2 reduction). > If you normalize the new matrix (shifting costs in the adjacent vector > until each row/column has minima 0) after a R2 reduction of a node with > infinite spill cost the problem should disappear. <snip> > Did you consider this option? We

Dear gluster experts, We have encountered a severe performance issue related to quota feature of gluster. My underlying fs is lvm with xfs format. The problem is if quota is enabled the io performance is about 26MB/s but with quota disabled the io performance is 216MB/s. Any one known what's the problem? BTW I have reproduce it several times and it is related to quota indeed. Here's the

Hi Kotresh, thanks for your repsonse... answers inside... best regards Dietmar Am 13.03.2018 um 06:38 schrieb Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar: > Hi Dietmar, > > I am trying to understand the problem and have few questions. > > 1. Is trashcan enabled only on master volume? no, trashcan is also enabled on slave. settings are the same as on master but trashcan on slave is complete

Hello, in regard to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434066 i have been faced to another issue when using the trashcan feature on a dist. repl. volume running a geo-replication. (gfs 3.12.6 on ubuntu 16.04.4) for e.g. removing an entire directory with subfolders : tron at gl-node1:/myvol-1/test1/b1$ rm -rf * afterwards listing files in the trashcan : tron at gl-node1:/myvol-1/test1$

Hey everyone, I just got one of these today: Nov 10 16:07:54 stormy kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: SCSI error: return code = 0x08000000 Nov 10 16:07:54 stormy kernel: sda: Current: sense key: Medium Error Nov 10 16:07:54 stormy kernel: Add. Sense: Unrecovered read error Nov 10 16:07:54 stormy kernel: Nov 10 16:07:54 stormy kernel: Info fld=0x0 Nov 10 16:07:54 stormy kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev

Hi Dietmar, I am trying to understand the problem and have few questions. 1. Is trashcan enabled only on master volume? 2. Does the 'rm -rf' done on master volume synced to slave ? 3. If trashcan is disabled, the issue goes away? The geo-rep error just says the it failed to create the directory "Oracle_VM_VirtualBox_Extension" on slave. Usually this would be because of gfid

Dear All, Yesterday evening or cluster has stopped. Two of our nodes tried to take the resource from each other, they haven''t seen the other side, if I saw well. I stopped heartbeat, resources, start it again, and back to online, worked fine. This morning I saw this in logs: Feb 22 03:25:07 node4 kernel: Lustre: 7:0:(linux-debug.c:98:libcfs_run_upcall()) Invoked LNET upcall

Hi I have some problems with my vpn. Im running version 1.1pre15 on all nodes. I have four nodes in my network. Node1 -> connects to Node2 Node2 -> connects to Node1 Node3 -> connects to Node1 and Node2 Node4 -> connects to Node1 and Node2 The problem is the connection between Node3 and Node4. The traffic is going via Node1 and Node2. Its unstable. package drops almost all the time

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. arrfab pushed a commit to branch master in repository centos/centos.org. The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: new ad2e60b Removed inactive Node4 sponsor ad2e60b is described below commit ad2e60b6c7385cc78bdb018a5175aa04c54dd520 Author: Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org> AuthorDate:

Hello GlusterFS users, can anybody give me please his opinion about the following facts and questions: 4 storage server with 16 SATA bays, connected by GigE: Q1: Volume will be set up as distributed-replicated. Maildir, FTP Dir, htdocs, file store directory => as sub dir's in one big GlusterVolume or each dir in it's own GlusterVolume? Q2: Set up the bricks as a collection of

Hi, I'm sometimes getting a failure of connecting 2 nodes when Tinc is started and configured in a LAN. In the logs, there are some unexpected dropped packets with very high or negative seq. I can reproduce this issue ~2% of the time. When this happens, the 2 nodes can no longer ping or ssh each other through the tunnel interface but using eth0 works fine. The connection can recover after at

Just upgraded to 2.7.6 and the yumrepo type does not write out our yum configs correctly, anyone experiencing this? Documentation hasn''t changed from what I can tell for this type. # facter -version 1.6.2 # puppetd --version 2.7.6 # facter architecture x86_64 # facter operatingsystem Fedora # facter operatingsystemrelease 14 ==== My manifest ==== yumrepo {

Lang Hames wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > > We did. The success of normalization in this case depends on whether > you attempt to normalize rows first, then columns, or the other way > around. > > Currently rows are normalized first, then columns. In your example the > infinite costs are thus propagated onto element 1 of node 0, rather > than node 4, which leaves us

Howdy Folks, I've got a 5 node setup here. My server "home" is the primary server that all other servers connect to. The configs on all the servers look like this: # cat /etc/tinc/home/hosts/node1 Subnet = 10.2.0.0/16 Address = 192.168.2.1 <RSA KEY> # cat /etc/tinc/home/hosts/node2 Subnet = 10.3.0.0/16 Address = 192.168.3.1 <RSA KEY> Etc. All the hosts are setup

hello all, we are developing and porting vorbis1decoder on a 24 bit platform. in the process we came across somedoubts about node bytes and leaf words. from the specification we got that we are arranging the huffman codeword tree into an array. the nodebytes are the number of bytes that are required to represent a node and leafwords are the no. of bytes required to represent the leaf i.e the

Hello, I have cluster with AMD EPYC 7351 cpu. Two CPUs per node. I have performance 8-NUMA configuration: This is from hypervizor: [root@hde10 ~]# lscpu Architecture: x86_64 CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit Byte Order: Little Endian CPU(s): 64 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-63 Thread(s) per core: 2 Core(s) per socket: 16 Socket(s): 2 NUMA