similar to: defer_destroy property set on snapshot creation

I have a Solaris 10 U8 box (142901-14) running as an NFS server with a 23 disk zpool behind it (three RAIDZ2 vdevs). We have a single Intel X-25E SSD operating as an slog ZIL device attached to a SATA port on this machine''s motherboard. The rest of the drives are in a hot-swap enclosure. Infrequently (maybe once every 4-6 weeks), the zpool on the box stops responding and although we

I posted a thread on this once long ago[1] -- but we''re still fighting with this problem and I wanted to throw it out here again. All of our hardware is from Silicon Mechanics (SuperMicro chassis and motherboards). Up until now, all of the hardware has had a single 24-disk expander / backplane -- but we recently got one of the new SC847-based models with 24 disks up front and 12 in the

I am running Nexenta NCP 3.0 (134f). My stmf configuration was corrupted. I was getting errors like in /var/adm/messages: Sep 1 10:32:04 llift-zfs1 svc-stmf[378]: [ID 130283 user.error] get property view_entry-0/all_hosts failed - entity not found Sep 1 10:32:04 llift-zfs1 svc.startd[9]: [ID 652011 daemon.warning] svc:/system/stmf:default: Method "/lib/svc/method/svc-stmf start"

I'm trying to get Samba 3.0.28 to work as an MS Dfs root providing a share that links home directories to the actual servers they reside on. Unfortunately, when I access the share from a Windows XP client, and try to open one of the directories, the client gives an error that it "refers to a location that is unavailable". I've done a lot of searching, and found a number of

hail, I have a soekris running an atom and 2GB RAM and ZFS using 7 drives, small capacity though, to test and study if I can make my home server this box and this way. It will be a simple server, three users tops. I followed the handbook and made the geli step on the disks: Geom name: label/zfs1.eli State: ACTIVE EncryptionAlgorithm: AES-XTS KeyLength: 128 Crypto: software UsedKey: 0 Flags:

G'day I'm currently using NUT on Debian squeeze box in the same subnet with an IBM 3000 HV (branded Eaton 5125 with Web/SNMP card), now I wanted to get our storage appliance running NexentaStor 3.1 set up to be using NUT too. Nexenta- Stor is an OpenSolaris / illumos-based appliance OS currently using NUT packages from ubuntu hardy. My question here is whether I'm running into a -

hail, I write just to make sure its dead. I've lost the first disk on a ZFS pool (jbod). Now I can't mount it with only the second disk. The first disk clicks to death :( [root@optimus ~]# zpool status pool: pool state: UNAVAIL status: One or more devices could not be opened. There are insufficient replicas for the pool to continue functioning. action: Attach the missing

I was messing around with a ramdisk on a pool and I forgot to remove it before I shut down the server. Now I am not able to mount the pool. I am not concerned with the data in this pool, but I would like to try to figure out how to recover it. I am running Nexenta 3.0 NCP (b134+). I have tried a couple of the commands (zpool import -f and zpool import -FX llift) root at

This must be resliver day :) I just had a drive failure. The hot spare kicked in, and access to the pool over NFS was effectively zero for about 45 minutes. Currently the pool is still reslivering, but for some reason I can access the file system now. Resliver speed has been beaten to death I know, but is there a way to avoid this? For example, is more enterprisy hardware less susceptible to

I am trying to configure a system where I have two different NFS shares which point to the same directory. The idea is if you come in via one path, you will have read-only access and can''t delete any files, if you come in the 2nd path, then you will have read/write access. For example, create the read/write nfs share: zfs create tank/snapshots zfs set sharenfs=on tank/snapshots root

Hello all, I am looking to setup a Samba AD on my NAS. I am currently using the latest version of NAS4Free which has Samba bundled into it already. However, I am getting a very nasty error when I go in to setup the samba service: Initializing... Looking up IPv4 addresses Looking up IPv6 addresses No IPv6 address will be assigned Setting up share.ldb Setting up secrets.ldb Setting up the

On 16/03/2020 01:55, Marcio Demetrio Bacci via samba wrote: > Hi, > > I think the error is in converting the POSIx ACl, but I don't know how to > fix this. You posted: My two DC are Samba4 (migrated of the Windows 2008 Server) and my current File Servers are Windows 2008 Server. Yet, you have a Unix domain member: netbios name = SRV-FILESERVER Is this the machine that you

On 21 Jun 2015 04:46, "Robert G. (Doc) Savage" <dsavage at peaknet.net> wrote: > > What should have been a routine upgrade to ZFS 0.6.4.1-1.el6.x86_64 > somehow failed, and now I've lost access to a 2T raidz2 array. I've > tried removing all zfs and related packages (spl*), then starting fresh. > For reasons that have have nothing to do with this problem (I

What should have been a routine upgrade to ZFS 0.6.4.1-1.el6.x86_64 somehow failed, and now I've lost access to a 2T raidz2 array. I've tried removing all zfs and related packages (spl*), then starting fresh. For reasons that have have nothing to do with this problem (I don't think), I'm still booted to kernel 2.6.32-431.29.2.el6.x86_64, and there are no other kernels installed.

I am getting the following error, however as you can see below this is a SMI label... cannot set property for ''rpool'': property ''bootfs'' not supported on EFI labeled devices # zpool get bootfs rpool NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE rpool bootfs - default # zpool set bootfs=rpool/ROOT/s10s_u8wos_08a rpool cannot set property for ''rpool'': property

my view contains a call to a partial: <%= render(:partial => ''item_list'', :collection => @keyword.synonyms, :locals => { :action_delete => "removesynonym", and_some_other_stuff }) %> _item_list.rhtml contains: <%= link_to ( image_tag(''/images/deletebutton.png''), { :action => action_delete, :id =>

Hi Does anyone here know a way who I could remove the validation for a model''s property? For example, I would like to have in one file: class A < ActiveRecord::Base validates_uniqueness :title end And in another file I want to override or rather remove the validation: class A < ActiveRecord::Base # somehow stop validating :title for uniqueness end The

FYI: We have a custom `checkout'' type which stopped working when migrating from 0.22.4 to 0.23.2-ish. This turned out to have been caused by the location of property.rb changing between 0.22.4 (puppet/type/property.rb) and 0.23.2-ish (puppet/property.rb). (I say 0.23.2-is because I''m using 40491ebe7ca9692b57fb533412ece8fb694b7d4c since it only has a few extra bugfixes over

I''m getting an error from IE on the following line in the newest prototype... element._extended = true; IE is saying that ''Object doesn''t support this property or method''. I''m using IE6. Has anybody else had similiar issues?

I would like to propose the addition of a position property for the base Effect class. By adding this dynamic property external objects, as well as callback functions know exactly how far along the effect has been rendered. It should be kept up-to-date in the render method, before or after the beforeUpdate event call I guess. I''m not sure. I think it would be a great addition,