similar to: CentOS to support ICH9

Hi, Well, ICH9 support for CentOS as announced on Oct 16th by me http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-October/088104.html has been extended. Today I have published x86_64 install DVD. You can find it here: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/pub/ich9/ Regards, David Hrb??

Hi, Those who are interested in anti Sloworis solution. I have built and packed mod_antiloris for C4/5. Packages are to be found at: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/i386/repoview/mod_antiloris.html http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/x86_64/repoview/mod_antiloris.html http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/stable/i386/repoview/mod_antiloris.html

btw - I installed your x86_64 rpms that has the ich9 patch directly on that box but it still will not boot without all the options. --- Michael Rock <mikerocks65 at yahoo.com> wrote: > > David wrote: > > Now there are right md5sums and even > > x86_64 iso.delta. > > David > > I tried using applydeltaiso and it creates a 2gb ISO > but I notice it fails on

Hi, RH devel kernels from http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5/ built against Centos tree are available here: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/x86_64/repodata/ http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/i386/repodata/ Regards, David Hrb??

Hi, I have (re)built a few apache modules not included in distro nor rpmforge. http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/i386/repodata/repoview/M.group.html http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/stable/i386/repodata/repoview/M.group.html http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/x86_64/repodata/repoview/M.group.html http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/stable/x86_64/repodata/repoview/M.group.html There's

I have 2 new boxes that I cannot use yet because of problems supporting these newer chipsets in 5.1. Does anyone know when the CD version of 5.0 x86-64 that has support for these chipsets be available on any on a Centos mirror? Has the support for these chipsets been added to yum yet? Here are my latest results with these chipsets and Centos 5.1 1. Asus P5K, E6850, P35 Chipset: Does not

Hi, as you might know I have created mod_gnutls for CentOS4 a few months ago. http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/stable/i386/RPMS/repodata/repoview/mod_gnutls-0-0.2.0-2.el4.hrb.html http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/stable/i386/RPMS/repodata/repoview/gnutls-utils-0-1.4.1-2.el4.hrb.html http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/stable/i386/RPMS/repodata/repoview/gnutls-devel-0-1.4.1-2.el4.hrb.html

Oops sorry, ugh another poor selection of words as I meant to say "When I saw the rest of my post snipped, I then realized that last request sounds really bad, which was not my intention. > When you snip the rest of my post man that last > request sounds really bad on its own. Sorry guys. I > saw the "uploading the new DVD's" a few days ago and > thought I would

All, For anyone interested, there is an rpm in the CentOS testing repository for mod_gnutls for CentOS 5. It allows named based virtual hosting for HTTPS (Single IP, multiple sites and certificates). The idea to build the RPMS came from this article: http://www.g-loaded.eu/2007/08/10/ssl-enabled-name-based-apache-virtual-hosts-with-mod_gnutls/ Here is a guide for installing and using the new

Michael Rock napsal(a): > Hi Dave, > > I am using applydeltaiso with your delta and > CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso 4,186,786 bytes from one > of the Centos mirrors. But the block size is wrong and > does not match the image length. > > So I checked the md5 on your delta and it does not > match your md5.txt file. I downloaded it again to be > sure. > > Your

> David wrote: > Now there are right md5sums and even > x86_64 iso.delta. > David I tried using applydeltaiso and it creates a 2gb ISO but I notice it fails on applying. kdnssd-avahi-devel.i386: copying unchanged payload kernel-xen.x86_64 (???): applying delta new payload open failed __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has

Hi, here are the unofficial C5 openssh5 rpms: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-ssh/stable/i386/ http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-ssh/stable/x86_64/ Regards, David Hrb?? PS:Some of you may find C4 versions of these. Please do not use them, they are not OK yet.

Hi, I have again worked on yum 3.2.8 for Centos 4 today, after a long time. The result is backported package yum-3.2.8-9.el4.hrb.2.1.5 which is the upgrade of yum-3.2.8-9.el4.hrb.2.1.3 I've been using smoothly for quite a long time. Packages are in testing repos: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/testing/i386/repodata/ http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/testing/x86_64/repodata/ I'd like to

Is there a compiled mod_bandwidth rpm in CentOS or EPEL? I can't seem to find it, what name does it use if there is one? Basically all I need to do is find a way to severely throttle apache for testing an upload progress bar - my bandwidth on my lan is too fast, the progress bar either only gets one update or none by the time the files are uploaded (5 8 megapixel jpegs) - even when I use

Hi everybody, I want to build mod_gnutls. The problem: CentOS' version of GNUTLS is too old to link against, so I compiled and installed GNUTLS from source and put it into /opt where it doesn't hurt the already installed GNUTLS. Now I have trouble linking against this version as the autoconf buildchain in mod_gnutls does not find the newer version. I tried like this: ./configure

Hi! I am currently publishing some web services on a Centos 5.3 server on my office using the included apache httpd. They are available from the Internet, and they require validation (username/password). I would like to publish them all under https, so the passwords won't travel unencrypted, but then all my sites use the same certificate on apache httpd. The solution to this is using an

I want to add mod_security to my Apache server running CentOS 5.3 and am trying to find a repository to get it from. I found it in EPEL, but they have version 2.1.7, which is over a year old according to what I found on the modsecurity.org website. Is there a repository which is keeping this up to date? Or should I just build it from source? -- Bowie

Can this be done with stock centos 4? Or can this even be done with the extras repo? -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore,

I am looking to be a bit more standard in the builds of my CentOS rpms, and so I was about to install mock but noticed that there is one provided in the centos/5/extras and another in epel. epel is obviously newer, but are there reasons/experiences in this group that would suggest sticking with the extras version instead? Or even reasons other than the shiny version number on the epel one to

I need to be able to install CentOS 5.2 on a machine with software RAID (and LVM) setup. I discovered (the hard way!) that there is a bug in the mkinitrd package that causes it to enter an endless loop when there are /dev/mapper/ devices present during the install process. There is a patch to mkinitrd, which I applied and created a new rpm for mkinitrd with this patch applied. I'd like to