similar to: Select rows based on matching conditions and logical operators

We observe a difference between a Windows 7 client and Windows 2003/XP client when accessing directories that should be accessible via the UNIX accounts primary group GID. Windows client refuses access. Ignoring for now why the two different client behaviours (either some subtle difference in the requests or the way the Samba reply is dealt with) the question is what should be the correct

Hi, I''ve been having some issues integrating bdrb on a cruisecontrolrb server It''s related to the way we stop the bdrb server. The thing is, right now when we stop the process we are killing the parent of the group of the process. This is ok if you''re running script/backgroundrb stop directly from the console, but if I''m running this from another process,

R 2.15.1 OS X and Windows Colleagues, I have a file that looks that this: TABLE NO. 1 PTID TIME AMT FORM PERIOD IPRED CWRES EVID CP PRED RES WRES 2.0010E+03 3.9375E-01 5.0000E+03 2.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 1.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 0.0000E+00 2.0010E+03 8.9583E-01

Ok, after familiarizing myself with clone it appears to me this is a bug in compiler-rt. >From the clone man page: In Linux 2.4 and earlier, clone() does not take arguments ptid, tls, and ctid. The source file passes those arguments without any fencing to check the Linux version. Also, ptid, tls, and ctid are only used in conjunction with certain flags (e.g., CLONE_PARENT_SETTID), but none

+Sergey Matveev On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Andy Jost <Andrew.Jost at synopsys.com> wrote: > Ok, after familiarizing myself with clone it appears to me this is a bug > in compiler-rt.**** > > ** ** > > From the clone man page:**** > > ** ** > > In Linux 2.4 and earlier, clone() does not take arguments ptid, tls, and > ctid. **** > > ** ** >

FWIW, now that privsep is mandatory I have no objection to including signal support in sshd. On Wed, 25 Jul 2018, Yonathan Bleyfuesz wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to propose some ideas to revivify this subject. > > -First, we could add support on the client to send signal thanks to the escape characters. > (code :

Hi there I''m using the latest release (r300) and ''script/backgroundrb start'' works perfectly when executed on the server, but when put inside a Rake task, it doesn''t launch the worker processes. The Rake task is as follows: task :start_backgroundrb do run "cd #{current_path} && ./script/backgroundrb start" end When I run this task, the

Hello! I want to start rsync on w2k as service. If I try to start rsync from command line it simply do nothig: $ rsync --daemon Administrator@dm-w2ks /usr/bin $ ps PID PPID PGID WINPID TTY UID STIME COMMAND 480 1 480 480 con 500 04:15:03 /usr/bin/bash 1428 480 1428 1420 con 500 05:26:46 /usr/bin/ps Administrator@dm-w2ks

As virtio-ccw devices are channel devices, we need to use the dma area for any communication with the hypervisor. This patch addresses the most basic stuff (mostly what is required for virtio-ccw), and does take care of QDIO or any devices. An interesting side effect is that virtio structures are now going to get allocated in 31 bit addressable storage. Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic at

From: Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> As virtio-ccw devices are channel devices, we need to use the dma area for any communication with the hypervisor. It handles neither QDIO in the common code, nor any device type specific stuff (like channel programs constructed by the DASD driver). An interesting side effect is that virtio structures are now going to get allocated in 31 bit

From: Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> As virtio-ccw devices are channel devices, we need to use the dma area for any communication with the hypervisor. It handles neither QDIO in the common code, nor any device type specific stuff (like channel programs constructed by the DASD driver). An interesting side effect is that virtio structures are now going to get allocated in 31 bit

As virtio-ccw devices are channel devices, we need to use the dma area within the common I/O layer for any communication with the hypervisor. Note that we do not need to use that area for control blocks directly referenced by instructions, e.g. the orb. It handles neither QDIO in the common code, nor any device type specific stuff (like channel programs constructed by the DASD driver). An

Hi, I am trying to identify duplicate values in a column in a date frame. The duplicated function identifies the duplicate rows in the data frame but it only does this for the second record, not both records. Is there a way to mark both rows in the data frame as TRUE? dfA$dups<-duplicated(dfA$Value) dfA Site State Value dups 929 VA 73 FALSE 929 VA 73 TRUE 930 VA 76 FALSE 930 VA 76 TRUE 931

I was wondering if someone can help me figure out the following: I have two patient datasets, ds1 and ds2. ds1 has fields "patid", "date", and "lab1". ds2 has "patid", "date", and "lab2". I want to find all the patids that have at least 2 dated records for each lab. I started by splitting each dataset by patid, to create ds1.list

Hi, I get the following error while building compiler-rt: /slowfs/msret_s1_us03/ajost/src/llvm-3.3.src/projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_stoptheworld_linux.cc:315:22: error: no matching function for call to 'clone' pid_t tracer_pid = clone(TracerThread, tracer_stack.Bottom(), ^~~~~ /usr/include/bits/sched.h:71:12: note: candidate function not

Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly. Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the terminology used. * Protected Virtualization (PV): Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest that operates in PV

Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly. Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the terminology used. * Protected Virtualization (PV): Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest that operates in PV

Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly. Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the terminology used. * Protected Virtualization (PV): Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest that operates in PV

Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly. Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the terminology used. * Protected Virtualization (PV): Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest that operates in PV

Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly. Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the terminology used. * Protected Virtualization (PV): Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest that operates in PV