Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "[zfs] LZ4 compression algorithm"
2006 Nov 29
3
Siemens Gigaset C450 IP vs S450 IP
I've just ordered a Siemens Gigaset C450 IP cordless
IP/DECT phone, given that it's supported by asterisk
http://www.voipuser.org/review_41.html
However, I see that a slightly better Gigaset S450 IP
is available for only a slight price premium.
Are there any user experiences with the S450 IP?
--
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
2011 Jul 30
7
NexentaCore 3.1 - ZFS V. 28
apt-get update
apt-clone upgrade
Any first impressions?
--
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
2012 Sep 19
0
OT: does the LSI 9211-8i fit into the HP N40L?
Hi again,
thanks for all the replies to the all in one with ESXi, it was
most illuminating. I will use this setup at my dayjob.
Now for a slight variation on a theme: N40L with ESXi with raw drive
passthrough, with OpenIndiana/napp-it NFS or iSCSI export of underlying
devices. This particular setup is for a home VMWare lab, using
spare hardware parts I have around.
I''m trying to do
2012 Oct 26
0
[Freenas-announce] FreeNAS 8.3.0-RELEASE
----- Forwarded message from Josh Paetzel <josh at ixsystems.com> -----
From: Josh Paetzel <josh at ixsystems.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:55:22 -0700
To: freenas-announce at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Freenas-announce] FreeNAS 8.3.0-RELEASE
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
rv:13.0) Gecko/20120621 Thunderbird/13.0.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
2011 Jul 21
0
Backblaze likes Hitachi Deskstar 5K3000 HDS5C3030ALA630
http://blog.backblaze.com/2011/07/20/petabytes-on-a-budget-v2-0revealing-more-secrets/
Seem to be real 512 Byte sectors, too.
--
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0
2010 Sep 28
0
Jeff Bonwick leaves Sun/Oracle
http://blogs.sun.com/bonwick/en_US/entry/and_now_page_2
Monday Sep 27, 2010
And now, page 2
To my team:
After 20 incredible years at Sun/Oracle, I have decided to try something new.
This was a very hard decision, and not one made lightly. I have always enjoyed my work, and still do -- everything from MTS-2 to Sun Fellow to Oracle VP. I love the people I work with and the technology
2009 Dec 08
1
Live Upgrade Solaris 10 UFS to ZFS boot pre-requisites?
I have a Solaris 10 U5 system massively patched so that it supports
ZFS pool version 15 (similar to U8, kernel Generic_141445-09), live
upgrade components have been updated to Solaris 10 U8 versions from
the DVD, and GRUB has been updated to support redundant menus across
the UFS boot environments.
I have studied the Solaris 10 Live Upgrade manual (821-0438) and am
unable to find any
2011 May 21
7
[cryptography] rolling hashes, EDC/ECC vs MAC/MIC, etc.
----- Forwarded message from Zooko O''Whielacronx <zooko at zooko.com> -----
From: Zooko O''Whielacronx <zooko at zooko.com>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 12:50:19 -0600
To: Crypto discussion list <cryptography at randombit.net>
Subject: Re: [cryptography] rolling hashes, EDC/ECC vs MAC/MIC, etc.
Reply-To: Crypto discussion list <cryptography at randombit.net>
2010 Mar 29
0
FYI: Ben Rockwood: Solaris no longer free
Just FYI, flame wars please >/dev/null
http://www.cuddletech.com/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=1120
Solaris No Longer Free
28 Mar ''10 - 10:14 by benr
Hot on the heals of Oracle''s revamp of Solaris support, the licensing agreement for free downloads of Solaris 10 have changed. Infoworld broke the news on Friday.
Here is the bit in question. Notice this paragraph in the Licensing
2009 Apr 15
5
StorageTek 2540 performance radically changed
Today I updated the firmware on my StorageTek 2540 to the latest
recommended version and am seeing radically difference performance
when testing with iozone than I did in February of 2008. I am using
Solaris 10 U5 with all the latest patches.
This is the performance achieved (on a 32GB file) in February last
year:
KB reclen write rewrite read reread
33554432
2012 Jul 15
0
[Freenas-announce] FreeNAS 8.2.0-RC1
Opensolaris this ain''t, but zfs-related nevertheless.
----- Forwarded message from Josh Paetzel <josh at ixsystems.com> -----
From: Josh Paetzel <josh at ixsystems.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:01:24 -0700
To: freenas-announce at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Freenas-announce] FreeNAS 8.2.0-RC1
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
rv:12.0) Gecko/20120506
2008 May 21
11
Per-user home filesystems and OS-X Leopard anomaly
I encountered an issue that people using OS-X systems as NFS clients
need to be aware of. While not strictly a ZFS issue, it may be
encounted most often by ZFS users since ZFS makes it easy to support
and export per-user filesystems. The problem I encountered was when
using ZFS to create exported per-user filesystems and the OS-X
automounter to perform the necessary mount magic.
OS-X
2008 May 17
3
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5470] New: Make check failures on Solaris 10 with rsync 3.0.3pre2
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5470
Summary: Make check failures on Solaris 10 with rsync 3.0.3pre2
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.3
Platform: Other
OS/Version: SunOS
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy:
2008 May 17
1
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5473] New: OS-X Leopard Rsync 3.0.3pre2 make check failures
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5473
Summary: OS-X Leopard Rsync 3.0.3pre2 make check failures
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.3
Platform: Other
OS/Version: SunOS
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy:
2008 May 17
1
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5472] New: FreeBSD 3.0.3pre2 'make check' failures
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5472
Summary: FreeBSD 3.0.3pre2 'make check' failures
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.3
Platform: Other
OS/Version: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy:
2008 Mar 02
3
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5297] New: merge test fails
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5297
Summary: merge test fails
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: SunOS
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy: bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us
QAContact:
2013 Oct 24
1
LZ4 compression in openssh
I'm a long time user of openssh and I was wondering if there is any work
towards supporting alternative compression methods in openssh like LZ4?
Regards,
Mark
--
Mark E. Lee <mark at markelee.com>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message
2013 Oct 25
0
LZ4 compression in openssh
Thanks for the response, what kind of problematic interactions would
occur (other than trying to compress seemingly random data)?
Regards,
Mark
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 04:02 -0400, Dan Kaminsky wrote:
> Compression has some problematic interactions with encryption that
> OpenSSH seems to have handled far before anyone else (by having it off
> by default).
>
> On Thursday, October
2013 Oct 25
1
LZ4 compression in openssh
I see.
From reading that wikipedia article, I'm wondering what gets compressed
when compression is enabled in openssh. Is it the ciphertext or the
cleartext?
Regards,
Mark
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 15:47 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 10/25/2013 03:23 PM, Mark E. Lee wrote:
> > Thanks for the response, what kind of problematic interactions would
> > occur (other than
2013 Oct 28
1
LZ4 compression in openssh
Also nice to know that zlib at openssh.com enables the compression only
after authentication, mitigating the known problems with compression
and passwords. It is also very hard to do chosen-plaintext attacks on
the client to server side (in opposite to HTTPS where that's trivial).
And most passwords that are typed after authentications are entered
character by character, making them fall under