similar to: postfix and upstart

On Wed May 30 17:57:49 EDT 2012, Nataraj wrote: > On Wed, May 30, 2012 17:00, James B. Byrne wrote: >> I am trying, without success, to create an upstart config file to >> automatically start and restart an ssh proxy. The command sting that >> I use in the script has been checked and verified from the shell but >> it fails in the upstart file. >> > The '-f

I am trying, without success, to create an upstart config file to automatically start and restart an ssh proxy. The command sting that I use in the script has been checked and verified from the shell but it fails in the upstart file. The file contents are: . . . # proxy is used to authenticate smtp submissions # so start it before the postfix service starts start on starting postfix # Take

I'm moving some server configurations from Ubuntu Server 12.04 to CentOS 6.6. Now I'm working on `/etc/init` script that should be handled by `upstart` at both OS as far as I know. The files on both server are the same and I mean the same at content level and also at path level and permissions level, is the exactly copy from Ubuntu to CentOS. I'm having some issues with upstart at

We run a CentOS-5 based hylafax server with external serial modems. We are transitioning to an Asterisk system using IAXmodem running on CentOS-6. On the CentOS-5 system to start the fax modems we added these lines to inittab: # Add fax lines and always ALWAYS run "telinit q" after making a change. fax1:2345:respawn:/usr/sbin/faxgetty ttyS0 fax2:2345:respawn:/usr/sbin/faxgetty ttyS1

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 04:19:59PM +0300, Boris Savelev wrote: > Hello! > > Try to use libvirt with lxc. > I use latest centos6 amd64 as a libvirt host (libvirt from xen4 repo) > libvirt-daemon-1.2.15-3.el6.x86_64 > In container I also use latest centos6 amd64. Container starts with > /sbin/init. CentOS 6 came with upstart as default init. > > My problem is that I

On Mon, April 17, 2017 17:13, Warren Young wrote: > > Also, I???ll remind the list that one of the *prior* times the systemd > topic came up, I was the one reminding people that most of our jobs > summarize as ???Cope with change.??? > At some point 'coping with change' is discovered to consume a disproportionate amount of resources for the benefits obtained. In my sole

Hi, I have an ubuntu system with some of our own services on it. I prefer to run these services as a non-root user. I can control the services using upstart as a non root user and can start and stop the service using initctl without any problems. I''m trying to use puppet to start and stop these services; however, it''s not obvious if it is possible. A suboptimal approach

I am a newcomer to CentOS and I appreciate the discussion. It would seem to me - and I am sure I am not the first one to state the obvious - Fedora is primarily a desktop OS while CentOS is primarily a server OS. The user needs are very different, the features needed are very, very different, hence many of the current features, or future features, should remain in one or the other and not cross

On Wed, March 28, 2012 09:44, James B. Byrne wrote: > CentOS-6.2 > > I am confused. Yes, yes I am. I was looking at the wrong server. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario

We have a bunch of lists hosted on a CentOS-4.9 server running sendmail and mailman that we are moving to a CentOS-6 vm running postfix and mailman. I am testing the setup and I am running into a problem no doubt caused by my own ignorance wrt postfix. Based on groking the web I discovered that the recommended way to configure postfix to work with mailman is a script called

Puppet 2.7.17 is a maintenance release for Puppet in the 2.7.x series. It contains a fix for the ubuntu service regression in 2.7.16 (#15027, #15028, #15029). Downloads are available at: * Source https://downloads.puppetlabs.com/puppet/puppet-2.7.17.tar.gz Windows package is available at https://downloads.puppetlabs.com/windows/puppet-2.7.17.msi RPMs are available at

This seems to me to be getting down to some sort of problem with configuring the Snom-870. when I register the device 41712 (set up for transport=tls only) then I see this in the SIP trace: Sent to udp:192.168.6.9:5060 at 4/3/2015 09:07:36:813 (836 bytes): REGISTER sip:voinet09.internal.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca:5061 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.6.112:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-udx92poqese6;rport

I am seeing these avc messages on a newly commissioned and up-to-date CentOs-6 virtual guest: ---- time->Thu Dec 4 12:14:58 2014 type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1417713298.610:60522): arch=c000003e syscall=2 success=no exit=-13 a0=7fd70e6de1e6 a1=0 a2=1b6 a3=0 items=0 ppid=2698 pid=4294 auid=0 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=2784 comm="trivial-rewrite"

On Fri, January 9, 2015 17:36, John R Pierce wrote: > On 1/9/2015 2:32 PM, Always Learning wrote: >> Enterprise, in the RHEL context, suggests stability or have I >> misunderstood the USA definition of "Enterprise" ? > > > Enterprise to me implies large business Enterprise literally means 'undertaking'. It has been used euphemistically since the later

I want to do something like this: 30 2 * * * MAILTO=testaddr at harte-lyne.ca; echo "this should be mailed" I have searched extensively and from what I have read I believe that this should work. But evidently I misapprehend how cron and MAILTO is supposed to work as my example does not cause any mail to be sent as far as I can determine from maillog. How does one specify unique

On Wed, December 10, 2014 17:51, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 12/10/2014 12:47 PM, Dan Hyatt wrote: >> I've a virtual instance and I need to know its IP address after it has >> finished booting up, to know where to ssh into it. I've tried adding >> "ip -4 addr > /dev/tty0" to rc.local, but that obviously doesn't work, >> because the login prompt

On Thu, December 4, 2014 12:29, James B. Byrne wrote: > > Re: SELinux. Do I just build a local policy or is there some boolean setting > needed to handle this? I could not find one if there is but. . . > Anyone see any problem with generating a custom policy consisting of the following? grep avc /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow #============= amavis_t ============== allow

On Fri, December 5, 2014 04:53, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > On 12/04/2014 03:22 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: >> On Thu, December 4, 2014 12:29, James B. Byrne wrote: >>> Re: SELinux. Do I just build a local policy or is there some boolean >>> setting >>> needed to handle this? I could not find one if there is but. . . >>> >> Anyone see any problem

On Mon, December 8, 2014 20:01, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > rpm -q selinux-policy > > selinux-policy-3.7.19-260.el6 is the current policy in development. >> Thank you. >>>> #============= postfix_showq_t ============== >>>> allow postfix_showq_t tmp_t:dir read; >>> Any reason postfix would be listing the contents of /tmp or /var/tmp? >>>

On Tue, December 9, 2014 18:45, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Am 09.12.2014 um 23:04 schrieb James B. Byrne: >> Applied policy update. Now I see these occasionally. But by the time I try >> and >> see what the matter is the file is gone: > > Why do you start a new thread instead of continuing the old one about > the very same topic? > If you have a way to thread