similar to: Using Puppet to swap eth0 and eth1

Some of the Red Hat Enterprise Linux servers in our environment sometimes get assigned virtual IP addresses (eth0:1, eth0:2, etc). Puppet Dashboard''s parameters seem like an ideal way to define and provision virtual IPs on these servers. One could create a "vip1" parameter on a node, and define a value of the IP address to use for that vip. A manifest could then be written to

I have a server located remotely running CentOS 5.x. I need to have two IP's on the same interface. So I have this: /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=none BROADCAST=69.x.x.199 HWADDR=00:x:x:x:c6:10 IPADDR=69.x.x.194 NETMASK=255.255.255.248 NETWORK=69.x.x.192 ONBOOT=yes GATEWAY=69.x.x.193 TYPE=Ethernet So I added this:

Hi, I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as follows: nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own address as source address nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own address as source address And the operating systems is extremely slow Interfaces files : [root at localhost ~]# cat

I have CentOS 4 running on an old (early model) p3 with 64 MB RAM. It is acting as a router and firewall for my LAN. CentOS is doing a really good job with Shorewall + DHCPd - on a 10 Mbps cable modem, I see ~ 9.7 Mbps of throughput even when numerous tcp streams to different LAN hosts are running. I would like to add a virtual interface to one of my LAN interfaces. My LAN interface

> Date: Monday, October 03, 2016 22:00:07 -0400 > From: TE Dukes <tdukes at palmettoshopper.com> > >> From: Gordon Messmer >> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 4:25 PM >> >> On 10/03/2016 04:54 AM, TE Dukes wrote: >> > I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every >> > was possible to be able to access the guest from the LAN

We just went to replace the bridge/firewall services one one server with the same on another. It's pretty simple, and I literally cloned (w/ rsync) a third server that does this onto the one that will be the new one. Then copied the /etc/sysconfig/iptables from the one being replaced, and brought it up this morning. Nope. We had to put everything back the way it was. The new one sees the two

dear All, I'm facing this routing problem, the setup is actualy part of ltsp, but I think this problem is Centos-specific. The server is a Dell Poweredge R210. The install is standard 6.4, updated. I have one nic facing the public internet: vi /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-em1 DEVICE=em1 BOOTPROTO=none HWADDR=d4:ae:52:c1:28:2b NM_CONTROLLED=no ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet

Hi Guys, I want to create multiple virtual interfaces on a system running linux 2.6. The main requirment being, to assign unique MAC address fo each of the virtual interfaces. I need to know, if this is possible and will really appriciate if someone can provide me pointer in this direction. Thanks a lot. R. Singh _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list

Hello all I am setting up a Centos 6 machine with one network card & one onboard network port. Both are recognized & work. Onboard Network port is unused yet, but is required for dedicated access to LTSP LAN, which would allow older PIII machines to boot from this system. I have installed LTSP but again Networking seems to be the problem area, as the clients won't boot from this

I need to allocate public IP address to two guest os. I have only 2 network card Interface on server. say eth0 and eth1. I set eth1 a public IP address. so it should in # vi /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-eth1 DEVICE=eth1 BOOTPROTO=static HWADDR=00:1a:4d:83:ad:00 BROADCAST=202.127.29.0 IPADDR=202.127.29.5 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 NETWORK=202.127.29.0 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet Question 1: do I have to

On my CentOS 6 partition of my laptop: First note that for this test, NetworkManager is not running because I did: chkconfig --del NetworkManager and then rebooted. Here is my ifcfg-eth0: DEVICE="eth0" NM_CONTROLLED="no" ONBOOT=no HWADDR=xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx TYPE=Ethernet BOOTPROTO=none IPADDR=192.168.2.5 PREFIX=24 GATEWAY=192.168.2.1 DNS1=192.168.2.1 DNS2=192.168.2.1

I have a server with 4 nics. Two are using different internet connections, both with static IP's, and two are connected to our private network. The two internet facing nics seem to be battling over the gateway designation. Which ever I designate as the gateway the other stops responding to incoming traffic. I need both to listen to inbound traffic. One for our main web page and the other

Setting up bonding in active-backup mode 1 (using ARP monitoring) on a server, it looked OK, but pulling the active link cable didn't actually work, it didn't fail over. Eventually with manual playing around with modprobe, ifconfig, ifenslave, etc., a solution was stumbled upon: enslave the eth1 device before eth0, and all is good. Why this should matter is a puzzle - I could not find

Dear Friends I have 2 netcards (eth0 to Internet and eth1 to internal network) in CENTOS 4.2, bit when I boot system the up eth0 and et1i [OK]. When I run ifconfig the eth1 has not IP configure, then I run command ifdown eth1 and ifup eth1, after eth1 is work perfect. Below I show file /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1 # Please read /usr/share/doc/initscripts-*/sysconfig.txt # for

host and guest both centos 5.5 network is 192.168.62.40 host is setup as follows [root at cloud2 ~]# ifconfig br0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1A:64:12:10:D9 inet addr:192.168.62.199 Bcast:192.168.63.255 Mask:255.255.254.0 inet6 addr: fe80::21a:64ff:fe12:10d9/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:1705488

> First off, I assume you can ping your link-local address: > > ping6 -I eth1 fe80::a00:27ff:fe03:5b8a > > Second, you never mentioned how eth1 was assigned its IPv6 address. > Given that you've tried to embed an IPv4 address within an IPv6 address > (which is normally done with a 0:0:0:0:0: prefix), I'd guess you did it > manually. If so, with what tools?

I'm running into a situation where a bogus bonded interface named "bond0" is being created, in addition to the desired "bond2" interface. Can anyone confirm this? Anyone know why it's happening or what I do to get rid of it? I wanted to start my numbering scheme at 2 instead of 0, which I didn't think would be a problem. As you can see, I have no reference

I have a test system that I am using to investigate CentOS-7. I note the following difficulty when booting from the Minimal Install DVD. Neither on the initial install nor on subsequent attempts at re-installing CentOS-7 can I set the IPv4 interface to a static IP address. I can configure it but I cannot save the changes. The save button remains greyed out. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a

Dear Centos-Virt: This is actually a second request for help on the same issue. I finally got to try what several months ago was replayed to me and no joy was to be had. I am afraid the original thread got stale and also had extra, unnecessary data in it. Guest=XP Pro, SP2 Host=CentOS5; # uname -r; 2.6.18-8.1.15.el5 VirtualBox-1.5.0_24069_rhel5-2.i586.rpm

Hi, I'm trying to configure a network bridge over a bonding without any success. Here is my configuration: ifcfg-eth0: DEVICE=eth0 HWADDR=00:1E:C9:E8:3F:E5 ONBOOT=yes USERCTL=no MASTER=bond0 SLAVE=yes ifcfg-eth1: DEVICE=eth1 HWADDR=00:1E:C9:E8:3F:E7 ONBOOT=yes USERCTL=no MASTER=bond0 SLAVE=yes ifcfg-bond0: DEVICE=bond0 ONBOOT=yes BRIDGE=br0 USERCTL=no ifcfg-bridge0: DEVICE=br0