similar to: how to allow ISC dhcpd to add/update entries to bind9 with bind_dlz (samba4)

Hi ! I bounce on the Mr Sloop's post ([Samba] DDNS / DHCPd && Internal DNS or BIND_DLZ) to ask what's the easiest way to allow Linux clients to update themself their DNS record in the Samba4 AD server (with BIND_DLZ Dns server). It works well with windows clients, but with Linux clients joined to the domain, with a valid Kerberos ticket, the client receive a error

So, I don't see much on the Wiki [actually nothing] and the relevant threads on the issue are few. So, let me try to outline what appears to be the current state of things and if I'm wrong, please correct me. Running DHCPd on the Samba 4 server works fine. Doing DDNS [dynamic DNS] updates can work with the BIND9_DLZ setup, but not the internal DNS setup. However, if the connecting Samba

A long time, this apeared on the list: > Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 08:17:26 -0700 > From: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> > To: Gal Goldschmidt <gal at cs.haifa.ac.il> > Cc: syslinux at zytor.com > Subject: Re: [syslinux] ISC DHCPD Problem and Solution. > > Gal Goldschmidt wrote: > > > > All the station in that group suddenly did not receive the net

Hello, I try to set up a AD with bind9 and isc-dhcp-Server for dynamic DNS-updates. I followd the wiki: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_DNS_records_wi th_BIND9 But I have this error: Oct 7 12:17:36 samba467 dhcpd: execute_statement argv[0] = /etc/dhcp/bin/dhcp-dyndns.sh Oct 7 12:17:36 samba467 dhcpd: execute_statement argv[1] = add Oct 7 12:17:36 samba467 dhcpd:

Has anyone had good luck serving dhcp addresses to Vista clients that work reliably? I have a test system and I can't seem to find out how to properly get dhcpd to always respond with broadcast instead of unicast since Vista won't honor unicast dhcp packets. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!! --------------

Hello Rolawnd, I followed the wikipage exactly. Bind9 is installed on the Samba DC. The Linux-Client should be a member of the Active Directory-domain? Regards ----- Mensaje original ----- De: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Para: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Enviados: Sábado, 7 de Octubre 2017 13:29:43 Asunto: Re: [Samba] bind9 and isc-dhcp-Server for

Does anyone remember if there is a way to coerce the ISC DHCPD version 2 (2.0pl5) to send options to a PXE client that does not explicitly request them. I can do this in version 3 of DHCPD via the vendor-option-space mechanism, but this is not available in version 2 of the server (the version my network switch uses). I want to be able to specify the PXE filename via option 209 (plus option 208

On 8 Nov 2019 at 0:42, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: > [in response to my = Frank Rysanek's rantings a few hours earlier:] > > if option architecture-type = 00:09 { > > filename "path/to/EFIx64/syslinux.efi"; > > } ... > > if substring (option vendor-class-identifier, 15, 5) = "00007" { > > filename

Dear gentlemen, here goes the documentation fix I was talking about :-) The Wiki page on PXElinux, specifically the chapter on UEFI at the end of that page: https://wiki.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php?title=PXELINUX#UEFI ...contains a few examples of ISC DHCPd configuration. The stumbling block for me was the syntax of these "if" scopes: if option architecture-type = 9 { filename

I'm trying to troubleshoot why our workstations have stopped dynamically registering their ip addresses in our AD using bind_dlz setup. It worked for a couple of months and now does not. I realized I have a basic question about how it is supposed to work. Do the workstations (after getting a dynamic address from the dhcpd server) contact the AD DC directly with the information? Or does dhcpd

Hi, I already solved this problem, I offer this a part of the FAQ or as a starting point for an FAQ addition I was using the RH pxe support, but I got tired of pressing F8. I wanted to make a few machines to auto boot without any intervetion, well that's what dhcp/bootp/pxe is all about right? I followed the HOWTO on the pxelinux site. I desperately upgraded to the latest ISC 3.1p9. The

This is my named.conf options { directory "/var/cache/bind"; notify no; empty-zones-enable no; auth-nxdomain yes; listen-on-v6 { none; }; forwarders { 192.168.10.3; 10.0.0.3; }; allow-query { 127.0.0.1/32; 192.168.16.0/24; }; allow-recursion { 127.0.0.1/32;

Hello List, Hello Rowland :-) again I'm having problems with the DDNS. I did it as shown in the wiki. I took all teh scripts from the wiki the dhcp-dyndns.sh is Version: 0.8.9 I configured everything including the failover. When I start the two DHCP-Server everything is perfect. I see the right messages in the log, the two DHCP-Servers are talking to each other. When a Client ask for an

Hi Rowland, I have not another dhcp server. dnsmasq is not configured. I think the problem may be permissions. Which distribution linux do you use, Ubuntu? I was tracing the script code dhcp-dyndns.sh, when the execution on the first line fails Is correct this instructions in Debian: chown root:root /etc/dhcp/dhcpduser.keytab chmod 400 /etc/dhcp/dhcpduser.keytab ----- Mensaje original

Dear, What do I need to configure the DHCP Bind9 update DNS records? I'm using Samba 4.4.5 AD and Bind 9. The DHCP passes the IP to the host but the DNS record is not updated. Thank you!

Hello everyone, I have configured my Samba as AD with BIND9_DLZ as backend and trying to configure the ISC-DHCP-server to add the leases to BIND_DLZ As described in the samba wiki: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_DNS_records_with_B IND9 Everything is working fine so far, but I get an error message as shown below in syslog: Aug 13 14:32:28 SAMBA dhcpd[4635]:

Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: > > The dhcpd.conf examples in the wiki page were modified from "nn:nn" to > "decimal" format by HPA in 2016 (quoting HPA: "UEFI - clean up > dhcpd.conf examples"). > > Please note that several other sites (e.g. the FOG wiki) also use > simple decimal notation for these types of examples. Whether the > decimal

> Dear gentlemen, > > here goes the documentation fix I was talking about :-) > > The Wiki page on PXElinux, specifically the chapter on UEFI at the end > of that page: > https://wiki.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php?title=PXELINUX#UEFI > ...contains a few examples of ISC DHCPd configuration. > > The stumbling block for me was the syntax of these "if"

I'm attempting to get a recent build of S4 rc5 + Bind9 + ISC DHCP server running. I've got everything pretty much set up, have attempted to implement a modified version of the script from here: http://blog.michael.kuron-germany.de/2011/02/isc-dhcpd-dynamic-dns-updates-against-secure-microsoft-dns/ but I keep getting a "TKEY is unacceptable" error. I've even attempted to

On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 22:02:42 +0200 Stefan Kania via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello List, Hello Rowland :-) > again I'm having problems with the DDNS. I did it as shown in the > wiki. I took all teh scripts from the wiki the dhcp-dyndns.sh is > Version: 0.8.9 I configured everything including the failover. When I > start the two DHCP-Server everything is