similar to: naiveBayes: slow predict, weird results

Hey, I just like to know how to extract details from the naiveBayes model (package e1071). I mean, for each possible value the model defines how much it influences the outcome. I want to sort those probabilities and show the values with the highest impact. How could I do that? PS: I tried using []'s to get to the model's internals, however, all I get is a "list" not a

Hi I'm trying to use RWeka to use a NaiveBayes Classifier(the Weka version). However it crashes whenever there is a NA in the class Gender Here is the.code I have with d2 as the data frame. The first call to NB doesn't make R crash but the second call does. NB <- make_Weka_classifier("weka/classifiers/bayes/NaiveBayesSimple") d2[,64]<-d2$Gender=="M"

Dear all, I tried a simple naive Bayes classification on an artificial dataset, but I have troubles getting the predict function to work with the type="class" specification. With type= "raw", it works perfectly, but with type="class" I get following error : Error in as.vector(x, mode) : invalid 'mode' argument Data : mixture.train is a training set with 100

Hi, I have written a code in R for classifying microarray data using naive bayes, the code is given below: library(e1071) train<-read.table("Z:/Documents/train.txt",header=T); test<-read.table("Z:/Documents/test.txt",header=T); cl <- c(c(rep("ALL",10), rep("AML",10))); cl <- factor(cl) model <- NaiveBayes(train,cl);

I'm trying to fit a naive Bayes model and predict on a new data set using the functions naivebayes and predict (package = e1071). R version 2.5.1 on a Linux machine My data set looks like this. "class" is the response and k1 - k3 are the independent variables. All of them are factors. The response has 52 levels and k1 - k3 have 2-6 levels. I have about 9,300 independent variables

Hello, We have a system which creates thousands of regression/classification models and in cases where we have only one input variable NaiveBayes throws an error. Maybe I am mistaken and I shouldn't expect to have a model with only one input variable. We use R version 2.6.0 (2007-10-03). We use caret (v4.1.19), but have tested similar code with klaR (v.0.5.8), because caret relies on

Hi, I'm currently using the R package e1071 to train naive bayes classifiers and came across a bug: When the posterior probabilities of all classes are small, the result from the predict.naiveBayes function become NaNs. This is an issue with the treatment of the log-transformed probabilities inside the predict.naiveBayes function. Here is an example to demonstrate the problem (you might need

My data is 50,000 instances of about 200 predictor values, and for all 50,000 examples I have the actual class labels (binary). The data is quite unbalanced with about 10% or less of the examples having a positive outcome and the remainder, of course, negative. Nothing suggests the data has any order, and it doesn't appear to have any, so I've pulled the first 30,000 examples to use as

Hi, I run R 2.10.1 under ubuntu 10.04 LTS (Lucid Lynx) and klaR version 0.6-4. I compute a model over a 2 classes dataset (composed of 700 examples). To that aim, I use the function NaiveBayes provided in the package klaR. When I then use the prediction function : predict(my_model, new_data). I get the following warning : "In FUN(1:747[[747L]], ...) : Numerical 0 probability with

I have two .txt files with lists of generated data I want to plot them on the same histogram. I'm aware of the histbackback function, but that is not really what I am looking for, I just want them on the same histogram but so they are still grouped separately (different colours, different norm curves etc). Does anyone know how to do this? Thank you. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello R-helpers, I would like to produce a boxplot for dates, using lattice. Here is a dummy example : dates<-as.Date(32768:32895,origin="1900-01-01") plouf<-data.frame(days=dates,group=factor(rep(1:2,times=128/2))) bwplot(group~days,data=plouf) # doesn't work, whereas : bwplot(group~as.numeric(days),data=plouf) # does, but is obviously not good looking when it comes to