similar to: python26-memcached on centOS 5.5

Hey all, I'm attempting to upgrade a Centos 5.9 machine to CentOS 5.10. But when I try the yum update command I get this response: --> Finished Dependency Resolution python26-PyYAML-3.08-5.el5.x86_64 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libyaml-0.so.1()(64bit) is needed by package python26-PyYAML-3.08-5.el5.x86_64 (installed) --> Running transaction

Hey guys, OK so I'm pretty familiar with how to edit an init script for memcached so that I can get multiple memcached 'buckets' when starting up the service. The init script would ususally have multiple lines such as these under the start function: # cache_block /usr/local/bin/memcached -d -m 128 -l `hostname -i` -p 11318 -u daemon -c 8172 -v 2>> /tmp/memcached.log

Hi Alberto, With systemd it will be as easy as creating additional unit files ( one for > each memcached instance) with its corresponding config file. That should > allow to stop / start / restart each memcache instance individually while > also being systemd compliant. Thanks for the info and for the examples. It really does make sense the way you explain it. Thanks for letting me

Hi all. I am thinking about installing memcached with replication, I've found http://sourceforge.net/projects/repcached/files/repcached/2.2.1-1.2.8/ but it is for 1.2.8, and for Centos 6.3 memcached is in version 1.4.4. I do not want to use client side "replication" (writing to two memcached nodes at the same time) and haven't found other solution. Are there any good, protocol

I was just testing the memcache server on a Windows box and had set it up as a Windows Service and to my surprise (or my shock really) it was using 47+ meg of ram with no data even loaded in it yet. Has anyone else used the Windows port of memcached for their Rails projects and if so how much ram was it using? Does memcached use less memory on Mac OS X or Linux than Windows? Thanks for any

Hello all, We know that memcached or memcached-client doesn''t support regex... But It seems it doesn''t support expire_fragment either :/ I''m trying to use expire_fragment with memcached as following : expire_fragment(:controller => ''home'', :action => :list_posts) But apparently it''s not supported by memcached : RuntimeError (Not

Yum checkupdate tells me I should update memcached, that the x86_64 1.4.5-1.el5 needs an update, I go to do that, and it complains that it's missing a dependency of libevent-1.4.so.2 (this is all 64 bit, CentOS 5.4). Clues... or is this actually broken? mark

Hi, I am trying to do fragment caching using :mem_cache_store. However, when I compare it to fragment caching using :file_store, it seems to be a lot slower. Here are the results: uncache Completed in 2.20246 (0 reqs/sec) | Rendering: 2.19891 (99%) | DB: 0.00017(0%) | 200 OK [ http://127.0.0.1/] using file_store Completed in 0.00952 (105 reqs/sec) | Rendering: 0.00702 (73%) | DB: 0.00000(0%)

Hi. I am using Capistrano for my webapp and after deploy I need to restart memcached service. I am trying to do it with sudo "/etc/init.d/memcached restart" But it does not do it, even if memcached service existed - after deployment memcached service is off. I did some researching and added run "sleep 40" right after sudo command and found that service process existed

Greetings, I posted this not on the Rails mailing list and didn''t get a definitive response so I thought I''d post it here, since I figure lots of you are using mongrel with Rails apps. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. I''ve been using file-based fragment caching and DB-based session caching quite extensively. I decided to try out memcached for both to

Could someone please elaborate on the technical differences and practical impact of whether choosing memory-based tables in MySQL or using memcached. I got this far on my own: It seems that MySQL uses the NDB engine for transaction-safe memory access in a cluster. the memory storage engine seems to be faster but not synchronizable by any means in a cluster. memcached seems to be ultimately fast

Hey, so - I''ve been fiddling about and fell in to use Joe''s simple-yet- painful SHLG (I shouldn''t complain... not at least I have time to produce one :)). I just recently plugged in memcache, and- it''s not preserving my login. I traced the execution and it sets the output of User.authenticate (a user AR object) into @session[''user'']

The move to memcached_client 1.6.5 in Rails 2.3 seems to have made the Rails cache about 10x slower. Since that''s the opposite effect I would expect, I was hoping somebody would explain where I''m misreading these numbers? I noticed my fragment caching was slow -- it shouldn''t take 2ms just to read a 2k string from a localhost memcached server: Cached fragment hit:

Is a find_by_sql query cached with memcached and cached_model (http://dev.robotcoop.com/Libraries/)? Looks like the answer is no. Is there a reason for this? I have a lot of very complicated querys with a lot of unions, subquerys and joins that would greatly benefit from the cache. Going through the code I can see that the find_by_sql method is changed in cached_model.rb, but it does not call

Hello after upgrading to 9.2-release i can see periodical page faults. advises welcome. examples: 1. Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 5; apic id = 22 fault virtual address = 0x18 fault code = supervisor read data, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff8051095c stack pointer = 0x28:0xffffff88a9d77800 frame pointer =

Hi folks. I''ve started down the memcached path and everything was running grand until I decided to start up my console. I have manually installed libevent 1.4.13 and memcached 1.4.4 into /usr/local, following which I sudo gem installed memcache-client and SystemTimer. development.rb has been modified to do caching with the mem_cache_store. The memcached process seems to work and my

I am unable to connect to build master at:google1.osuosl.org:9990 from my buildslave. See attached twisted9.0.0 log. 2010-02-12 09:50:03-0800 [-] Log opened. 2010-02-12 09:50:03-0800 [-] twistd 9.0.0 (C:\Python26\python.exe 2.6.2) starting up. 2010-02-12 09:50:03-0800 [-] reactor class: twisted.internet.win32eventreactor.Win32Reactor. 2010-02-12 09:50:03-0800 [-] Starting factory

Hi there, I''ve got a Rails app that''s a little unusual in that it maintains a database representation of a filesystem (for an image gallery). Thus, if the filesystem is essentially ''out of date'' then the controller''s list action will end up invoking a model update (which involves a filesystem scan). I''m using sqlite3 as this app will be

On 21/12/14 02:25, Tim Dunphy wrote: > Hey all, > > I'm attempting to upgrade a Centos 5.9 machine to CentOS 5.10. > > But when I try the yum update command I get this response: > > --> Finished Dependency Resolution > python26-PyYAML-3.08-5.el5.x86_64 from installed has depsolving problems > --> Missing Dependency: libyaml-0.so.1()(64bit) is needed by

Hi - Just downloaded and installed the memcache-client and cached_model gems and am trying to test it out on a development setup. I added this to my environment/development.rb CACHE = MemCache.new :c_threshold => 10_000, :compression => true, :debug => true, :namespace => ''eztrip'',