similar to: Is that possible to create profiles shares into group structure?

Hi, This To field was not correct indexed by FTS. To: Yamada Taro <yamada at example.com>,=?UTF-8?B?dXNlcjJAZXhhbXBsZS5jb20=?= <user2 at example.com>, =?UTF-8?B?dXNlcjNAZXhhbXBsZS5jb20=?= <user3 at example.com>, user4 desu <user4 at example.com> --> Yamada Taro <yamada at example.com> , user2 at example.com And follow was correct indexed by FTS To: Yamada

Hello all, I have samba 3 with a share named shareA using these settings: [shareA] comment = Directory Amministrazione path = /col/shareA browseable = no valid users = @amm force group = amm public = no writable = yes create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770 printable = no where user1, user2, user3 and user4 belong to "amm" group. I would like to

On 1/08/2016 10:01 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Op 7/31/2016 om 4:27 AM schreef Reuben Farrelly: >> Hi, >> >> I've observed some odd behaviour with dsync replication between two >> hosts, specifically to do with sieve script replication. >> Has anyone else experienced the replication problem? Are sieve >> scripts actually replicating in live time for

Hi, no, that's my fault. I changed the UIDs and user names in my "ls -l" to unpersonalized/example data for my mail and didn't think about putting these values into the range. A better unpersonalized data example would look like: ---------- drwx------ 43 DOM\user1        DOM\group  4096 Jan 10 08:00 user1 drwx------   5 DOM\user2        DOM\group  4096 Jan 11 08:13 user2

Hi, I have an small network with SUSE 9.1 and trying to use samba. I was reading a lot of papers about samba, but i cannot do something i need. In my computer i have a directory named cotiza owned by user4(me) with the group users and mode 765. M users list there're user1, user2, user3 and user4 all of them with users group. In smb.conf have: [cotiza] comment = Directorio de Cotizaciones

Ok, you are completely right. Here are the real numbers with changed user names: drwx------ 43 DOM\user1        DOM\domain-user  4096 Jan 10 08:00 user1 drwx------   5 DOM\user2        DOM\domain-user  4096 Jan 11 08:13 user2 drwx------ 92 DOM\user3        DOM\domain-user   4096 Jan 16 08:39 user3 drwx------   3        133265        DOM\domain-user   4096 Sep  7 2015 user4 drwx------   7       

Without using Dundi or SER, any thoughts on the following anyone? Has something similar been implemented anywhere so as to me not having to horribly butcher code... 4 servers SIP1-4 User1 -- -- SIP1 -- \ / \ User2 ------ Go to register ------- SIP2 ----- Whereis? --> DB / \ / User3 --

I have a client with a linux server with samba installed and I've created users using the smbpasswd command (user1,user2,user3...) but when I go to the XP machines they can see the different shares but are unable to write to the folders or create additional folders based on their user1 and password. I want them to validate themselves to the linux server so that if their domain goes down they

Am 16.01.2018 um 17:26 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:54:17 +0100 > Andreas Hauffe via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Ok, you are completely right. Here are the real numbers with changed >> user names: >> >> drwx------ 43 DOM\user1        DOM\domain-user  4096 Jan 10 08:00 >> user1 drwx------   5 DOM\user2       

Dovecot version 2.1.7 Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS Kernel 3.2.0-35-generic x86_64 I'm not sure exactly when this started occurring, but sporatically users report issues receiving email, having email saved to "Sent," etc. Looking in dovecot.log, I see the following errors: 2013-10-16 09:53:20 imap-login: Info: Login: user=<user1>, method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, mpid=27434,

Hi, we are running a file server as member server of a windows 2012 domain. Now we are facing the problem, that some UIDs are not mapped to the user names by the running winbindd process. This results in "nobody" usernames for nfs shares mounted by other clients. When doing an "ls -l" in the homes directory on the member server (file server), the list looks like:

I've spent some time updating, upgrading and generally consolidating an old Samba AD. I've managed to remove a very old unsupported (4.2) Samba AD DC following migration to a couple of new DC's - that seems to have worked out OK. Workstation logons and GPO's working fine. I'm now left with one problem after joining a new Samba (4.5.12) member server to the domain for file

Dear All. I have a file server. I installed the samba on it to store the document. See below for the security : - group : + g1 : user1, user2,user3 + g2 : user4, user5,user6 + g3 : user1,user5 - folder : + folder A : set permission chmod 775 and group chown root:g3 The problem is when the user1 modified a file in folder A then that file add the group g1 automatically. So

Perhaps related to the other errors I just reported, I also see a few of these in the dovecot-2.0.3 logs: lda(pid 8212 user user3): Error: Opening INBOX failed: Mailbox doesn't exist: INBOX lda(pid 8212 user user3): msgid=<201009240906510365.1gj1fpfhrhhm9 at mail>: save failed to INBOX: Mailbox doesn't exist: INBOX lda(pid 8212 user user3): Error: BUG: Saving failed to unknown

All, On our main file server, all our home directorys are automount points. So /home isn't a real filesystem area, it points to a bunch of different home areas based on the auto.direct table. Example: /home/user1 mounts from --> /export/home1/user1 /home/user2 mounts from --> /export/home2/user2 /home/user3 mounts from --> /export/home2/user3 /home/user4 mounts from -->

Hello all, I could not find anything in the discussion groups or documentation about using LDAP and Unix group mappings. The documentation states that in order to map unix groups to samba groups, you need to use the net group add command. However, I have an ldap backend and all my groups, that I care about are in LDAP. So I have a group called mainwdev. dn:

Hi, we recently upgraded dovecot from 1.0.5 to 1.1.3+latest patches. After the upgrade I saw some errors in the logs and I'm not sure whether they're a cause for concern. Our setup is 2 servers running openSUSE 11.0 and a NetApp Filer as storage backend. Following is the config: protocols: imap imaps pop3 pop3s login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login login_executable(default):

Unfortunately, the the Ubuntu 18.04 samba-tool package doesn't have "user show" as an option. The Windows ADUC tool shows user1 uidNumber =10001, user2 uidNumber=10002, user3 uidNumber =10003, and user4 uidNumber=10004 Here are the getent command results on the file server/ domain member: *admin at fsvr0:~$ getent passwd user1* hq-user1:*:11103:10513::/home/lan/user1:/bin/bash

Hi, looks like we detected a serious bug in dovecot's lmtp proxying where e-mails are delivered to the wrong user. The setup is: *) Dovecot is configured with "lmtp_proxy=yes" # Support proxying to other LMTP/SMTP servers by performing passdb lookups. lmtp_proxy = yes *) Postfix uses "dynamic recipient verification", so Postfix starts sending a (verify) mail by LMTP to

Hi, I've observed some odd behaviour with dsync replication between two hosts, specifically to do with sieve script replication. In short, I have two hosts which replicate in a master-master type setup where almost all of the reads and writes happen to just one of the two hosts. They are both running 2.2.devel (9dc6403), which is close to the latest 2.2 -git . Pigeonhole is running