similar to: Preventing winbind from crashing while KDC is unreachable

Hi list, I just upgrade my samba and I get from my connected shares: the specified path does not exist.On ip-adress it works great, but I don't want to change this on 100 clients. A few Infos Samba-Version 3.2.5 security = ADS getent passwd and getent group works also fine id could resolv standard-group and the rest group Loglevel is 3 but nothing usefull is in there. Hope you could help

Hello, I recently measured the distances ndist[0][nb_subvect-1] which are used to make the decicion, which codebook entries are to be used in libspeex/cb_search.c (function split_cb_search_shape_sign). For that I took a couple of audio books (all german speech), downsampled the tracks to 8kHz and encoded them with "speexenc -n --bitrate 15000 ..." (I used svn revision 11825). Usually,

Hello, I just checked out the latest version of speex and I want to compile it. The INSTALL file says that's easy: bjoern@deimos:~/studium/beleg/resources/svn/speex$ cat INSTALL Installing Speex is as easy as: % ./configure [--prefix=<install-path>] % make % make install Note that if you are using the code from SVN, you will need to run "autogen.sh" instead of

Hello, I do test runs of speex using speexenc -n [name].wav [name].spx The wav-files (6 different speech files) hereby are sampled at 44100Hz. Most interestingly, all Frames have SubModeID 5. I haven't tracked the Assignment of the SubModeID through the source code, so I just wanted to ask, if I can assume "speexenc -n" to use SubModeID 5 always? Ciao, Bj?rn -- You will

Hi, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >> I haven't tracked the Assignment of the SubModeID through the source >> code, so I just wanted to ask, if I can assume "speexenc -n" to use >> SubModeID 5 always? > > Only if you never change the bit-rate. But speexenc -n was a dumb idea > in the first place... I know ... Thats why I downsampled the WAV-File to 8kHz (I got

Hello, just to make sure I haven't gotten anything wrong: In cb_search.c (function split_cb_search_shape_sign) after all that searching nb_subvect CB entries are being written into the stream. These are all taken from the same codebook. If I wanted to, I could just change their order, couldn't I? Because important is only the linear combination of them all together, which I keep

Hi, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Not sure I understand your question. Change the order of what within what? In cb_search, we iterate nb_subvect times over a codebook, finding nb_subvect codebook entries to quantize the excitation signal. After finding these nb_subvect codebook entries, they're written into the stream: /*save indices*/ for (i=0;i<nb_subvect;i++) {

Hello Jean-Marc, Hello speex-dev-people, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > All I can suggest is having a look at my simple client at: > http://people.xiph.org/~jm/speexclient/ Unfortunately, this does not compile: <<<<< snip >>>>> bjoern@phobos:~/beleg/speex/speexclient-0.0-dev$ ./configure checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether

Hey Bjorn, Were you able to figure this out or is it still broken for you? Our scenario is a little bit different, but I have a theory as to what may be going wrong. What linker are you using when you compile your project with clang-cl? I am wondering whether the version of the linker and/or the libraries that you are using is too old in comparison to the one used for the clang compilation.

Hi, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Well, you could change the order in the encoder as long as you reverse > it in the decoder as well. Ok, I see that in the split_cb_shape_sign_unquant function, that each coefficient is tied to it's position in the nb_subvect exc coefficients. Honestly, I have problems understanding what exactly the codebook search works like. If you have the time to to

Hello Bj?rn, I can totaly agree with that, having multiple users with the same id isnt what we want, but samba needs at some point root rights, for creating folders/files. Now we have a "chicken and the egg problem" which one comes first? At install of samba files and folders are created, by root. when installed, started samba and now we can assign a uid/gid to Administrator. But

Hello kind developers, I am planning on creating a steganographic extension for speex/CELP. Since speex/CELP is lossy, there should be quite many bits that one can use for hiding data. I'm familiar with the principles of CELP (two filter loops, one for pitch, the other for formants, let the raw speech frame run through those filter loops, take residue signal, map it on a codebook entry,

Hello, as I posted in my last message, is it not possible to position a RTF-Document. But it's possible with TIFF-Documents. The Pagemaker Internal Error is: "Diese Datei kann nicht posoitioniert werden. " "File not found (8601:0002)" Wine says the following: fixme:file:AreFileApisANSI (void): stub fixme:file:AreFileApisANSI (void): stub fixme:file:AreFileApisANSI

Hi, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >> 1. What is the point in multiplying a codebook index with some number >> ant adding a loop variable to it as done in the exc unquant function. >> for (j=0;j<subvect_size;j++) >> exc[subvect_size*i+j]+=s*0.03125*shape_cb[ind[i]*subvect_size+j]; > > That's just how you represent a 2D array in C: the codebook has

!! Tumbs Up !! Bj?rn !! and sernet Thank you.. Upgrading now.. I was waiting on this one.. Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: bb at sernet.de [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] >Namens Bjoern Baumbach >Verzonden: dinsdag 21 april 2015 17:32 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] sernet = dead? > >On 04/21/2015 05:23

Hello! My Linux-server is every day attacked with brute-force password cracking attacks. I use openssh-3.9p1 (SuSE Linux 9.2) with standard setup (PAM, LoginGraceTime 2m, MaxAuthTries 6). Unfortunately, I see cracking attempts with very short delays (1 second): Jan 31 00:46:53 XXX sshd[10774]: Invalid user backup from ::ffff:66.98.176.50 Jan 31 00:46:54 XXX sshd[10776]: Invalid user server

Is there anything I can do about it? BTW: gcc is loosing the AVR backend, so I would assume, there will be a greater interest to this in llvm compared to the past. Thanks, Wilhelm Am 03.04.20 um 15:09 schrieb Wilhelm Meier via llvm-dev: > Should I create an issue in bugzilla for this? Just to be reminded ... > > Am 31.03.20 um 09:34 schrieb Wilhelm Meier via llvm-dev: >> Hi

Hi Dylan, looks ok now. One thing: the ISR is now: __vector_21: ; @__vector_21 __vector_21$local: sei push r0 push r1 in r0, 63 push r0 clr r0 push r24 lds r24, v1 sts v2, r24 pop r24 pop r0 out 63, r0 pop r1 pop r0 reti There are unneccessary push/pops of r1 and r0 too, since the clr is useless ... GCC had the same

Hey Wilhelm, That's a bug, the "interrupt" attribute is not being recognized by the backend. I have fixed it in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/339b34266c1b54a9b5ff2f83cfb1da9cd8c9d90a Pull the latest LLVM and it should be fixed. On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:00 AM Wilhelm Meier <wilhelm.meier at hs-kl.de> wrote: > Hi Dylan, > > I used the following

Hello LLVM people, after finishing Chapter 1 and 2 of the KaleidoscopeJIT tutorial, I started to play around with the code and now, I have even more questions than before. I hope that the people reading this could help me with it, to improve my understanding about the LLVM and the JIT. I have also the source code and binaries (Windows) available but because I don't know how the mailing list