similar to: CTDB crash - trying to allocate > 256kB of memory

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "CTDB crash - trying to allocate > 256kB of memory"

2014 Feb 26
0
CTDB Debug Help
Hello, I've got a two node CTDB/Samba cluster that I'm having trouble with trying to add back a node after having to do an OS reload on it. The servers are running CTDB 2.5.1 and Samba 4.1.4 on AIX 7.1 TL2. The Samba CTDB databases and Samba service work fine from the node that was not reloaded. The rebuilt node is failing to re-add itself to the cluster. I'm looking for
2018 Sep 05
1
[ctdb]Unable to run startrecovery event(if mail content is encrypted, please see the attached file)
There is a 3 nodes ctdb cluster is running. When one of 3 nodes is powered down, lots of logs will be wrote to log.ctdb. node1: repeat logs: 2018/09/04 04:35:06.414369 ctdbd[10129]: Recovery has started 2018/09/04 04:35:06.414944 ctdbd[10129]: connect() failed, errno=111 2018/09/04 04:35:06.415076 ctdbd[10129]: Unable to run startrecovery event node2: repeat logs: 2018/09/04 04:35:09.412368
2013 Sep 04
0
Recommended CTDB release for new installation
Hi folks, We're building a new CTDB cluster - any recommendation on what version of CTDB is the most "production" at the moment? We're currently on 1.2.66 on our currently in-service clusters. Cheers, Orlando > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [Samba] [Announce] CTDB 2.4 available for download > Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:11:29 +1000 > From:
2013 Apr 09
0
Failed to start CTDB first time after install
Hi, I am setting up a two node Samba cluster with CTDB in AWS in two different subnets. All IP ports are open between these two subnets. I am initially forming the Samba cluster with one node, then will add the second node after startup of CTDB. I am not using public_addresses for CTDB due to AWS not supporting VIP's. I am using 64bit Amazon Linux with two NICs defined, eth0 as the
2018 May 08
0
CTDB Path
Hi Micha, On Mon, 7 May 2018 15:46:50 +0200, Micha Ballmann <ballmann at uni-landau.de> wrote: > i'm still trying to find out what is the right path for ctdb.conf > (ubuntu 18.04, samba was compiled from source!!). > > When im trying to start CTDB without any config file, my log in > /usr/local/samba/var/log/log.ctdb shows me: > > 2018/05/07 12:56:44.363513
2012 Apr 17
0
CTDB panics when vacuuming serverid.tdb
CTDB Samba Team, I have a two-node cluster successfully running a GFS2 filesystem. I compiled ctdb ver 1.12 with Samba 3.6.3 for 64-bit systems. Running on RHEL 5.7. I was able to add the cluster to the domain but after I restarted CTDB, it panics right after doing a vacuum of the serverid.tdb database. The lock file is on the GFS FS so both nodes can access it. Any ideas as to what
2020 Mar 03
2
start/stop ctdb
Thanks, i added "Environment=PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/samba/bin:/bin". Needed also to add "/bin" because couldnt find "sleep". Thats the script now: ---- [Unit] Description=CTDB Documentation=man:ctdbd(1) man:ctdb(7) After=network-online.target time-sync.target ConditionFileNotEmpty=/usr/local/samba/etc/ctdb/nodes [Service]
2018 Feb 26
0
[ctdb] Unable to take recovery lock - contention
When the ctdb is starting, the "Unable to take recovery lock - contention" log will be output all the time. Which cases will the "unable to take lock" errror be output? Thanks! The following the ctdb logs: 2018/02/12 19:38:51.147959 ctdbd[5615]: CTDB starting on node 2018/02/12 19:38:51.528921 ctdbd[6602]: Starting CTDBD (Version 4.6.10) as PID: 6602 2018/02/12 19:38:51.529060
2014 Jul 21
0
CTDB no secrets.tdb created
Hi 2 node ctdb 2.5.3 on Ubuntu 14.04 nodes apparmor teardown and firewall and stopped dead The IP takeover is working fine between the nodes: Jul 21 14:12:03 uc1 ctdbd: recoverd:Trigger takeoverrun Jul 21 14:12:03 uc1 ctdbd: recoverd:Takeover run starting Jul 21 14:12:04 uc1 ctdbd: Takeover of IP 192.168.1.81/24 on interface bond0 Jul 21 14:12:04 uc1 ctdbd: Takeover of IP 192.168.1.80/24 on
2020 Mar 03
1
start/stop ctdb
On 03/03/2020 09:13, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote: > Am 3/3/20 um 10:05 AM schrieb Micha Ballmann via samba: >> Mar? 3 09:50:50 ctdb1 systemd[1]: Starting CTDB... >> Mar? 3 09:50:50 ctdb1 ctdbd[24663]: CTDB starting on node >> Mar? 3 09:50:50 ctdb1 ctdbd[24667]: Starting CTDBD (Version 4.11.6) as >> PID: 24667 >> Mar? 3 09:50:50 ctdb1 ctdbd[24667]: Created PID file
2020 Mar 03
0
start/stop ctdb
Ah, yes, thats it Ralph.. Good one. Then in the systemd.service file you need to add. [Service] Environment=PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/samba/bin > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Ralph Boehme via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 3 maart 2020 10:13 > Aan: Micha Ballmann; Anoop C S > CC: samba at lists.samba.org >
2020 Mar 03
1
start/stop ctdb
Hai, Hmm, about .. > "Environment=PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/samba/bin:/bin". > Needed also > to add "/bin" because couldnt find "sleep". /bin should be found in $PATH.. In since it looks like it does not. Then i suggest this: Environment="PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/samba/bin:/usr/local/samba/sbin:/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin" # to make sure you
2018 Feb 26
0
答复: [ctdb] Unable to take recovery lock - contention
Am Montag, 26. Februar 2018, 17:26:06 CET schrieb zhu.shangzhong--- via samba: Decoded base64 encoded body with some chinese characters: ------------------原始邮件------------------ 发件人:朱尚忠10137461 收件人:samba at lists.samba.org <samba at lists.samba.org> 日 期 :2018年02月26日 17:10 主 题 :[ctdb] Unable to take recovery lock - contention When the ctdb is starting, the "Unable to take recovery lock
2018 Feb 26
2
[ctdb] Unable to take recovery lock - contention
When the ctdb is starting, the "Unable to take recovery lock - contention" log will be output all the time. Which cases will the "unable to take lock" errror be output? Thanks! The following the ctdb logs: 2018/02/12 19:38:51.147959 ctdbd[5615]: CTDB starting on node 2018/02/12 19:38:51.528921 ctdbd[6602]: Starting CTDBD (Version 4.6.10) as PID: 6602 2018/02/12 19:38:51.529060
2015 Aug 04
1
Does CTDB run under LXC containers?
I'm using libvirt_lxc and that has an XML based configuration. Based on what I've read, I think I need to add this to the ctdb container's config: <features> <capabilities policy='default'> <sys_nice state='on'/> </capabilities> </features> That didn't do the trick though. I need to figure out how to turn on all caps to
2015 Aug 04
0
Does CTDB run under LXC containers?
Hi Peter, On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:11:56AM -0700, Peter Steele wrote: > We're transitioning from a VM based environment to one that uses LXC based > containers running under CentOS 7. CTDB runs fine under our CentOS 7 VMs. > The same packages running under LXC however seem to have issues: > > # systemctl start ctdb.service > Job for ctdb.service failed. See 'systemctl
2013 Oct 30
0
[Announce] CTDB 2.5 available for download
Changes in CTDB 2.5 =================== User-visible changes -------------------- * The default location of the ctdbd socket is now: /var/run/ctdb/ctdbd.socket If you currently set CTDB_SOCKET in configuration then unsetting it will probably do what you want. * The default location of CTDB TDB databases is now: /var/lib/ctdb If you only set CTDB_DBDIR (to the old default of
2023 Nov 26
1
CTDB: some problems about disconnecting the private network of ctdb leader nodes
My ctdb version is 4.17.7 Hello, everyone. My ctdb cluster configuration is correct and the cluster is healthy before operation. My cluster has three nodes, namely host-192-168-34-164, host-192-168-34-165, and host-192-168-34-166. And the node host-192-168-34-164 is the leader before operation. I conducted network oscillation testing on node host-192-168-34-164?I down the interface of private
2015 Aug 04
3
Does CTDB run under LXC containers?
On 2015-08-04 at 19:27 +0200, Ralph Böhme wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:11:56AM -0700, Peter Steele wrote: > > We're transitioning from a VM based environment to one that uses LXC based > > containers running under CentOS 7. CTDB runs fine under our CentOS 7 VMs. > > The same packages running under LXC however seem to have issues: > > >
2015 Aug 04
3
Does CTDB run under LXC containers?
We're transitioning from a VM based environment to one that uses LXC based containers running under CentOS 7. CTDB runs fine under our CentOS 7 VMs. The same packages running under LXC however seem to have issues: # systemctl start ctdb.service Job for ctdb.service failed. See 'systemctl status ctdb.service' and 'journalctl -xn' for details. # systemctl status ctdb.service