similar to: Samba4 and Bind with DLZ

Could you, please, give me some clue on how to configure dlz in Bind to work with Samba4? I installed samba4 from git check out from a week ago, then I provisioned it but DNS is not working. Best regards, Felix.

Hello: I would like to know what is wrong in my configuration. I can't see this server in network neighborhood. samba 3.5.6 joined to my active directory domain. [global] # message command = /bin/sh -c '/usr/bin/linpopup "%f" "%m" %s; rm %s' & security = ADS netbios name = dos realm = EPEPM.CUPET.CU password server = ad.epepm.cupet.cu workgroup =

Hi I have s4 with bind9 working fine. I see that it sets up a forward zone without using zone files (is that the dlz bit?) Is it possible to get it to produce a reverse zone? Thanks, Steve pp lcb

The problem was definitely SELinux and/or firewall (iptables). Thank you for the help. On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 09:47 -0500, felix at epepm.cupet.cu wrote: > > > I am not able to get the Samba4 internal DNS server to respond to DNS > > > requests on the network. > > > > > >

I can confirm this behavior, forwards work ok until the limit is reached. Setup is a single DC with less that 6 machines joined to the domain and maybe another 6 machines pointing at this DNS. Does anyone want the gdb info that was stated from a prior thread back in issue 10? interim fix: I just added ulimit -n 8192 to the start script and a cron to restart samba twice a day for now. samba

I followed the Howto http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO Using: -Samba4 alpha15 -Bind9.8.0 When I added an XP PC (192.168.123.244) to my domain I got this in syslog: May 11 12:04:18 samba4 named[10705]: client 192.168.123.244#1061: update 'mydomain.com/IN' denied May 11 12:04:18 samba4 named[10705]: tkey.c:486: ENSURE(result == (((1) << 16) + 28) || result == 0) failed,

I provisioned using the defaults. So now I'm using the internal DNS server. Since I've been having some issues with it (see Internal dns server stops forwarding) I would like to change to bind9, but now I don't have the files samba4 creates to use with it because I started using the internal dns server. How can I switch from internal dns server to bind9??? Cheers, Felix.

Hello, I have recently compiled, installed and configured samba4 to run on a FreeBSD server. samba -V reports the version to be Version 4.1.0pre1-GIT-57990cb. The server has working BIND 9.9 and ISC-DHCP services running on it. I have provisioned samba 4 to use the BIND_DLZ DNS backend. On the whole things seem to be working. local names are being resolved. phpLDAPAdmin shows the new

Recently I migrated to samba4 in my company. So far so good. debian 6 samba4.1.0pre1 bind9.9.1-P1 (working pretty well. it even updates the reverse zone and no problems at all with the forwarder) ntp-4.2.6p5 All services authenticating with samba4: mail (postfix + dovecot + squirrelmail), jabber (openfire), proxy (squid), even MS Sql server 2000, Net Support Manager and GFI Endpoint Security.

I followed this http://linuxcostablanca.blogspot.com/2012/01/samba-4-ubuntu.html and got dynamic dns updates working in forward zone. any ideas to get it working in the reverse zone too? By the way, nice article Steve. Best regards, Felix.

I've just installed samba4 beta 7 with defaults and everything went OK. As I download bind9.9.1 tarball and compiled it I had to follow steve's advice: to declare we'll be using DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION 2 in /samba-master/source4/dns_server/dlz_minimal.h /*#ifdef BIND_VERSION_9_8 #define DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION 1 #else #define DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION 2 #endif */ #define DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION 2 I

How to achieve DLZ for ADDC with bind9.12.x?? I have it working with 9.11 but for 9.12? dlz "AD DNS Zone" { # For BIND 9.8.x # database "dlopen /usr/lib/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9.so"; # For BIND 9.9.x # database "dlopen /usr/lib/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so"; # For BIND 9.10.x # database "dlopen

Good to know... Sorry if the question was already answered here... Regards to all. On 6/25/18 4:33 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Mon, 2018-06-25 at 16:26 -0400, Leslie León via samba wrote: >> How to achieve DLZ for ADDC with bind9.12.x?? I have it working with >> 9.11 but for 9.12? > First figure out what if anything they changed in the DLZ ABI. > > We may need to

Hello. We have a couple of questions regarding Samba 4.1.0pre1-GIT-aad669b running on Gentoo GNU/Linux 1) Is MS 1.2.840.113556.1.4.1941 operator support implemented (planned to be implemented) in Samba 4 internal LDAP server? Please compare: $ ldapsearch -h 192.168.1.32 -x -D 'CN=someadminuser,OU=Administrators,DC=klin,DC=kifato-mk,DC=com' -b

Dear all, is there a good HOWTO for the DLZ plugins available? Greetings Daniel ----------------------------------------------- EDV Daniel M?ller Leitung EDV Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus Paul-Lechler-Str. 24 72076 T?bingen Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499 eMail: mueller at tropenklinik.de Internet: www.tropenklinik.de -----------------------------------------------

> Hello Felix, > > Sorry for the very late answer, > > Well I remade a test today, in gpmc.msc (group policy management console), I have no errors from Windows about the ACLs of the folders for my policies. Thanks a lot for your answers, Matthieu and Christopher. It makes me happy to know that you guys don't forget to answer the questions of samba users. My first solution was

Hello. I noticed that any domain user can delete the content of the shared folder sysvol in the domain controller from a windows client. How can I avoid that? Greetings, Felix

Thank all those who have responded, mainly to Rowland and tell them that I just managed to mount a samba server 4.7.3 with Debian 9 implementing the option of NONE when choosing the DNS server, the steps that followed were as follows 1- Download samba 4.7.3 2- ./configure.develpment & make & make install 3- apt-get install debian9 4- Follow the steps of the how to of the samba website 5-

Reading Whatsnew.txt in samba I understand that If I use s3fs, as it is set by default in the provision step, I won't be able to modify GPOs later, right? So I have a couple of questions: - What's the advantage of using s3fs over ntvfs in new installations? - If I'm planning to deploy a new Domain, probably needing to change GPOs later, should I select ntvfs??? Best regards, Felix

On Sat, 09 Dec 2017 18:46:39 +0000 sandy.napoles at eccmg.cupet.cu wrote: > 9 de diciembre de 2017 13:34, "Rowland Penny via samba" > <samba at lists.samba.org> escribió: > > > On Sat, 09 Dec 2017 18:01:44 +0000 > > sandy.napoles at eccmg.cupet.cu wrote: > > > >> 9 de diciembre de 2017 12:57, "Rowland Penny via samba" > >>