similar to: samba-3.4.7 & access to share from win7

Hi I have setup a Samba AD and connected a Windows 7 machine to the AD... I'm having problems getting the Remote Desktop Users group to work... [root at bart private]# samba-tool group addmembers "Remote Desktop Users" mj ldb_wrap open of secrets.ldb Added members to group Remote Desktop Users [root at bart private]# samba-tool group listmembers "Remote Desktop

Hi My next try is to create the group myself, but the point here was that the Builtin group created by the provisioning of Samba, doesn't work... /Martin ----- Original meddelelse ----- Fra: "L.P.H. van Belle" <belle at bazuin.nl> Til: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Sendt: onsdag, 2. marts 2016 16:55:41 Emne: Re: [Samba] Remote Desktop Users Group not

Dear R users I use Windows XP, R2.5.1 (I have read the posting guide, I have contacted the package maintainer first, it is not homework). In a research project on renal cell carcinoma we want to compute Harrell's c index, with optimism correction, for a multivariate Cox regression and also for some univariate Cox models. For some of these univariate models I have encountered an error

Hi guys When trying to join a Samba NT4 domain (running on Samba v4), using a FreeIPA server as a backend, I get an Access is Denied on my Windows 7 machine... Log files shows: ACCESS DENIED (granted: 0x00000201; required: 0x00000010) i'm trying to use the user "mj" to do the join: [root at bart ~]# id mj uid=1935800001(mj) gid=1935800001(mj)

Hai, You must have mist something.. I did it as followed in the GPO settings. I created a "DOMAIN\Allow-RDP" group in the AD. Added users to this group. In the GPO, i used "default computer" Policies - Windows settings - security settings - Restricted groups. Here add your DOMAIN\Allow-RDP to the Remote Desktop Users. And - Windows settings - security settings

Hi, If I'm not mistaken, the Remote Desktop Users is a local group. Si as Said Louis, you'll have to create a domain group that will be added to the local group on each machin through GPO Regards, Le 02/03/2016 17:28, Martin Juhl a écrit : > Hi > > My next try is to create the group myself, but the point here was that the Builtin group created by the provisioning of Samba,

Hi. I subscripted just now to the mailing list, but I've been using a Samba file server (PDC) on Debian for about 2.5 years now. Users are almost all WinXP SP3. No users are complaining but since I changed everything to one share with group permission on underlying directories I see a lot of errors in log.smbd. Anyone knows what the log message exactly means? I guess it has something to

Hi there, I have a problem I can not solve myself. I have samba 3.0.28 installed on a Ubuntu 8.0.4 server. Samba is a member of AD. Authentication is kerberos, user- / group ids are handled by nis (Windows 2008 SFU / NIS Server). My Samba config: [global] write list = admin,rado,@Administratoren deny hosts = 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 client schannel = No allow hosts = localhost,

Hi, I have a strange problem listing a share with, e.g. # ls -al /path/to/share I have a samba-client-3.5.4-68.el6_0.2.x86_64 on a Scientific Linux 6 (as a virtual machine - if it matters) and an samba-3.0.33-0.30.el4 server on a RHEL4. When I try the listed command I get the following in the servers logfile (on log lever = 3): [2011/04/29 16:29:39, 3, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)]

I am seeing some odd behavior on a Solaris 8 system. If I try to access a symlinked file, reduce_name is having a problem with the link >From a level 10 log: [2003/05/12 11:50:12, 3, pid=18558] lib/util.c:(387) unix_clean_name [/disk2/OC192/syee_test1.bat] [2003/05/12 11:50:12, 3, pid=18558] smbd/vfs.c:(800) reduce_name [disk2/OC192/syee_test1.bat] [/vobstore] [2003/05/12 11:50:12, 3,

Hi, I have a little problem : Some user have problem with file is read-only mode But all unix acl and posix acl are correct : ls -l drwxrwx---+ 19 root Utilisateurs 4096 jun 9 11:33 STEPHANE -rwxrwx---+ 1 root Utilisateurs 1027584 jun 7 14:33 dossier fraise.ppt getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file:

Hi all, Is there a way to use the "encrypt passwords" and the "passwd chat" programs simultaneously? smb.conf(5) doesn't mention anything about them being mutually exclusive, yet when I run testparm on the smb.conf file, I get: ERROR: the 'passwd chat' script [...] expects to use the old plaintext password via the %o substitution. With encrypted passwords

Hi, i tried to running Samba 3.0.9 with MSDFS under Linux 2.6.9. The normal sharing of Directories to the Target-Server (also Samba with same version and Linux) run's without problems. Only the dfs-share to the same Samba-Server is not usable. The Share-Name self is visible but without cointain. I have compiled the new source with the "--with-msdfs" switch and have also check the

Hi, my details: Server: 3.2.3 Client: win2k8 When I try list contents of a shared directory through an ASP script (win2k8 is the client), it's take much time and on samba I saw many times (4 times for each file) the same error: "fill_share_mode_lock failed" I tried "shares mode = No" but no success It's the log: ...:49, 3]

Samba 3.0.7, XP Pro SP1 clients When I view the "Properties|Security" tab on a folder from my XP SP1 clients, the checkboxes indicating the various permission settings are all empty. The share is functioning fine otherwise, permissions are OK when inspected from the Unix side. Does anyone know a work around (or fix!)? This came up back in 2003, without resolution:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 We had 3.0.2a which worked fine. If you tried to open a file that the ACLs wouldn't let you, you'd get access denied. We had follow symlinks=no in smb.conf Now with 3.0.8, and no other changes, we get a message about "The file has moved or otherwise gone away," instead of access denied. And we get this in the log file: [2004/11/16

Ubuntu Samba server running Version 3.4.0 Most windows and OS X clients connect with no issues. Permissions are working correctly on shares and umask settings are working on Window 7, OS X, and XP. The annoying mystery here is that these little bugs are annoying users and taking up precious time... Most recently, Mac1 (OS X 10.6.5 smb Version 3.0.28a-apple) is able to change a directory's

After upgrading from samba3-3.3.10-40.el5.i386.rpm to samba3-3.4.7-42.el5.i386.rpm, I'm seeing a lot of [2010/05/05 11:06:42, 1] smbd/vfs.c:932(check_reduced_name) reduce_name: couldn't get realpath for addrbook/CVS [2010/05/05 11:06:42, 1] smbd/vfs.c:932(check_reduced_name) reduce_name: couldn't get realpath for beta/CVS [2010/05/05 11:06:42, 1]

Hello, I have Fedora Core 3 linux and Samba 3.0.14a on a server that has 2 ethernet interfaces connected to the same LAN. The purpose to have such a server with 2 network cards is to serve 2 network shares with high traffic. I want the first share to be accessed trough the first network card (named drone.domain.com) and the second share trough the second card (named probe.domain.com). My DNS

AIX 5.2, Samba 3.0.11, OpenLDAP 2.2.23. Can someone explain what reduce name is supposed to be checking? The final debug uses "p" as the "reduced" name, but p is NULL to start and only has a value during the code path IF there was no entry found on the first call to realpath at which point the last component is removed and we try again. Now since p points to the character