similar to: XP machine wont join domain

Using CentOS 7.5, I can't (and don't expect) to see rhn-ssl-tool. But I was expecting to find something similar. I can't see anything in the recent RH documentation about it - I presume it was remove/changed with the move from Spacewalk to Satellite - but I presume the functionality is still required? Has something replaced it? Cheers L. ------ '...postwork futures are

Hi, I downloaded the subselect package from CRAN and installed it in the system wide R library path. During installation the package compiled the fortran sources with no errors. However, when loading the library gives me an error: > library(subselect) Error in dyn.load(x, as.logical(local), as.logical(now)) : unable to load shared library

The laws already exist: Disturbing the peace, Misappropriation of public funds, Prohibition on unfunded mandates. What's lacking is prosecutors, judges, and juries who see the politicians as getting in the way of the statesmen and the people. To drag this back towards On Topic, it seems to me that the ntp folks might be petitioned to write up and submit to the Congress, a paper

This might show up twice, I think I sent it from a bad address previously. If so, please accept my apologies. In Fedora 22, one developer (and only one) decided that if the password chosen during installation wasn't of sufficient strength, the install wouldn't continue. A bug was filed, and there was also a great deal of aggravation about it on the Fedora testing list. So, it was

Hello, I have generated 2 Poisson processes and want to plot them on a single graph in a step by step manner in order to be able to compare them. I tried plot and biplot but it does not help, I could connect two points by hand for point graph if they were 5 or 10 I have more than 200 such point to be connected and Poisson cluster makes it difficult for me to even read them properly. Can anyone

On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 11:16:18AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Scott Robbins <scottro at nyc.rr.com> wrote: > > This might show up twice, I think I sent it from a bad address previously. > > If so, please accept my apologies. > > > > > > In Fedora 22, one developer (and only one) decided that if the password > >

Someone might want to add this to the docs - cable list and compatibility list - took me way to long to find. I was trying to find information on my UPS and came up with the following names for the same UPS series. Powerware 5119 Exide name was NetUPS SE Deltec name was PowerRite Pro II (1000VA-3000VA) What I have: The Exide NETUPS SE model PRC2400a p/n 05144038-3904 OUTPUT 2400VA 1600 WATTS

agroveterinario bittemple fdts We are your your convenient, safe and private online source for FDA a`p`p`roved pharmacy prescriptions. V*ico*dinPain Killers We accept almost every form of payment. Q D http://thiscansolvetheprb.biz/aps/ No thanks: http://thiscansolvetheprb.biz/wdj/rm.html Young Hopeful: "Father, what is a traitor in politics?Father (a veteran politician): "A

On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Scott Robbins <scottro at nyc.rr.com> wrote: > This might show up twice, I think I sent it from a bad address previously. > If so, please accept my apologies. > > > In Fedora 22, one developer (and only one) decided that if the password > chosen during installation wasn't of sufficient strength, the install > wouldn't continue.

On 25/07/15 18:24, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 11:16:18AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Scott Robbins <scottro at nyc.rr.com> wrote: >>> This might show up twice, I think I sent it from a bad address previously. >>> If so, please accept my apologies. >>> >>> >>> In Fedora 22, one

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 15.03.2013 12:09, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Marcus Johnson wrote: >> but no matter what you choose to do FLAC MUST REMAIN LOSSLESS. > > That has always been and will remain goal #1 for FLAC. FLAC stands for Free Lossless Audio Codec, so "lossy FLAC" is like "honest politician", or "fast turtle".

I have the following data of continuous time Markov chain. Time - [1] 0.00000000 0.01219893 0.35903929 0.69378720 0.77247183 1.56008543 [7] 1.80607724 2.59023990 2.87196272 3.05311707 3.14737319 3.20758500 [13] 3.26668915 3.42428440 3.53324567 3.83668537 3.96784473 4.17196149 [19] 4.29982361 4.46163281 4.78519834 5.20381355 5.65441135 5.78623851 [25] 6.07602075 6.10351864 6.37001057 6.62859413

Hi List, I remember someone mentioning a R-specific bundle of Emacs. Can you please post link again? Regards, Atul. -- Atul S. Kulkarni Graduate Student, Department of Computer Science, University Of Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55812. www.d.umn.edu/~kulka053 --------------------------------------------------------- "Before you start some work, always ask yourself three questions - Why am I

I write about R every weekday at the Revolutions blog: http://blog.revolutionanalytics.com and every month I post a summary of articles from the previous month of particular interest to readers of r-help. In case you missed them, here are some articles related to R from the month of May: R tops the annual KDNuggets Data Mining Software poll for the first time: http://bit.ly/Kjr9mr R 2.15.1 is

Hi, I have the following type of data: 86 subjects in three independent groups (high power vs low power vs control). Each subject solves 8 reasoning problems of two kinds: conflict problems and noconflict problems. I measure accuracy in solving the reasoning problems. To summarize: binary response, 1 within subject var (TYPE), 1 between subject var (POWER). I wanted to fit the following model:

I agree with Renato here. From someone who is just beginning to participate in this thread, the sheer amount of ad hominem argument thrown about is disappointing and unhelpful. What we need is a specific proposal to center the discussion and then line by line review that breaks out into (potentially) more specific discussion on individual points if they are contentious. Sent from my iPhone >

Additionally we should reach out to individual stakeholders and get real data about: 1. Given the current workflow, what would it take to change to this different workflow. Whether or not it is easy or hard should be left out. Just specific details. 2. Once the workflow has been changed, how does this workflow change day by day living for their users? Again this should be specific and a

Reposted to this list: (http://lists.virus.org/voipsec-0610/msg00046.html) > That's exactly the type of thing that needs to be stopped. If Dell outsourcing calls me from India, the CLI must be their number in India not a faked-in number of some office in the US. That to me is exactly the purpose of this proposed law. It is equivalent to the law regarding FAX calls that has been

> On Jul 29, 2016, at 7:52 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 29 July 2016 at 15:26, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> I believe David Chisnall up-thread cited a difference in checkout times >> on the order of a handful of seconds versus a couple of minutes. While >> naively it

On 29 July 2016 at 15:26, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I believe David Chisnall up-thread cited a difference in checkout times > on the order of a handful of seconds versus a couple of minutes. While > naively it might seem not a big deal, over time and depending on what you > are trying to do yes it can be a big burden. TL;DR: This thread