similar to: File permissions 0070 with Office 2010 after saving

I am migrating the main file servers at work onto a new storage platform based on GPFS. I am using RHEL 5.6 with the samba3x packages (aka 3.5.4) recompiled to get the vfs_gpfs and tsmsm modules, with a couple of extra patches to vfs_gpfs module to bring it 3.5.8 level. It is running with ctdb against Windows AD 2008 R2 domain controllers with all the idmapping been held in the AD. In order to

I was reviewing the GPFS VFS module this afternoon after I had a request to add Thumbs.db to the hide files option. Now I was under the impression that the GPFS VFS module mapped this through to the Windows attributes on the under lying file system. That is assuming that your GPFS file system is sufficiently recent to support Windows attributes. I did some experimentations with a Terminal

Running with Samba 3.5.4, the Samba3x packages from CentOS 5.6 with added gpfs and tsmsm VFS modules against a GPFS 3.4.0.6 file system. Unix extensions are turned off because otherwise OS X 10.5 messes with group ownership and permissions and shares for "groups" don't work as required. Unfortunately being at a University I don't get to control the environment tightly, unless

Hello, I am using the vfs_gpfs samba module to map ACLs through samba. It works fine on files, but directory ACLs are ignored. Ex: getfacl /sb/share/myplace/ file: sb/share/myplace/ owner: root group: root user::rwx user:afrankel:rwx group::--- mask::rwx other::--- When I try to access this folder in Windows, I get permission denied. The same permissions on a files, I can open it / modify it

Tried single quotes on Domain Admins in the pam.d file as well as a backslash on the space with no effect. I've found several references that just say "no spaces in group names." Is there really no way to do this? Also, most references I find to using these lines in pam.d say that "sufficient" should work, but I'm finding that users in the named group can then log in

Some empirical testing shows that if I am using the idmap_ad module the template homedir parameter in smb.conf is ignored. I would just like to determine if this is the correct behaviour or if I am doing something wrong. JAB. -- Jonathan A. Buzzard Email: jonathan (at) buzzard.me.uk Fife, United Kingdom.

When a file is created with samba 3.5.x or 3.6.x, it is created effective read-only: ~ # getfacl Microsoft\ Word-Dokument\ \(neu\).docx # file: Microsoft\040Word-Dokument\040(neu).docx # owner: root # group: 11816 user::rwx user:11582:rwx #effective:r-- group::rwx #effective:r-- mask::r-- other::--- The ACL-settings for the parent directory are ok: ~ # getfacl . #

Hi, I'm trying to set up samba share exporting gpfs filesystem and I strugle with setting sharemode to yes. Samba is 3.6.5, gpfs version is 3.2.1-29 (the latest available for 3.2 branch). Everything works fine when sharemode is set to no, but I'd rather insist to switch it to yes. That's what man page says: no - do not propagate sharemodes across all GPFS nodes. This should only be

Hello :-) FYI, here is a list of apparent Tika 0.8 conversion failures when run from Xapian's omindex on a Debian 6 Squeeze 64-bit system with 4 GB memory: doc files: tried: 10268, failed: 345 3.35% docx files: tried: 248, failed: 0 odp files: tried: 7, failed: 0 ods files: tried: 71, failed: 0 odt files: tried: 136, failed: 0 pdf files: tried: 3888, failed: 150

Hi I'm encountering an error with some of my Windows clients when using CTDB and samba to access a GPFS hosted share. We see the following error all the time. [2011/03/14 12:31:16.549084, 1] modules/vfs_gpfs.c:1099(vfs_gpfs_ntimes) vfs_gpfs_ntimes: set GPFS ntimes failed -1 The copy continues but is slow. All the timestamps seem reasonable for the data copied. The GPFS

Hello All, I'm trying to set up linux ssh/shell authentication on a CentOS_6.2 server running smbd version 3.5.10-114 using winbind/smb/pam. We've done this successfully using the tdb backend but wanted users to get the same UID/GID on every machine. Switched to rid for the backend but users still got a foreign number for UID and their default group was always Domain Users. So I'm

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.16 release series. Changes since 4.16.0 -------------------- o? Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> ?? * BUG 14831: Share and server swapped in smbget password prompt. ?? * BUG 15022: Durable handles won't reconnect if the leased file is written ???? to. ?? * BUG 15023: rmdir silently

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.16 release series. Changes since 4.16.0 -------------------- o? Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> ?? * BUG 14831: Share and server swapped in smbget password prompt. ?? * BUG 15022: Durable handles won't reconnect if the leased file is written ???? to. ?? * BUG 15023: rmdir silently

Hello everyone I have been struggling a lot with Samba and this mailing list is my last hope. I have a windows server 2008 R2 and my aim? is to store the user's roaming profiles to a samba share. I don't want users to be able to login into the linux machines using their windows credentials just to save their roaming profiles on a samba share. To achieve this I followed numerous pages

I'm trying to debug a phantom I/O error which I mentioned before (https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2023-March/244431.html - it turned out it has nothing to do with kernel oplocks). And noticed samba is regularly tries to load libgpfs.so. This is done in gpfswrap_init() in lib/util/gpfswrap.c, which is used in vfs_gpfs.c (understandable) *and* in lib/util/debug.c. The latter added by

Hi, On 11/15/23 09:33, Ulrich Sibiller wrote: > Thanks for that hint about case sensitivity's performance penalty. > > For clarifaction: The user is doing mainly reads, so does the > "create" you mention also cover opening/reading files? no. Is it a metadata heave small file workload? That will likely be somewhat slower compared to Windows, but not in the order of

Hello Ralph, Thanks for that hint about case sensitivity's performance penalty. For clarifaction: The user is doing mainly reads, so does the "create" you mention also cover opening/reading files? If only _creation_ of files is suffering from that we probably have some other/further performance issue. We have gpfs, which does not offer a case-insensitive mode, neither does the

Hi Rob, on your Info for Version 3.0.25 you pointed out the VFS-Module GPFS for using features of the underlaying GPFS-Filesystem. Also the man-pages-3/vfs_gpfs.8.html points to that module, but I can't find it anywhere. We are using a GPFS 3.2 3-Node Samba Cluster (3.0.24/28) on Dell HW. We would be very glad if it is posible to get - Quota Recognition for our users (we use "max

Urgh? I modified the FreeBSD kernel to allow all_xx_fd() calls on O_PATH descriptors and that seems make vfs_zfsacl to work fine. Not 100% tested but I could atleast view and modify the ACL on some stuff from a Windows client via Samba that way. I?m not sure I?ll be able to get them to implement this ?officially? though. Reading ACLs via an O_PATH-opened descriptor seems to be on the way of

=================================================================== "Change is such hard work." Billy Crystal =================================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is is the latest stable release of Samba 3.6. Major enhancements in Samba 3.6.7 include: o Fix resolving our own "Domain Local" groups