similar to: SMB2 weird behavior with samba 3.6 PDC

First off, I'm a little confused but I've been trying to do some research and still have some questions... (please forgive me!) I'm trying to figure out the "best" (ie. fastest) way to connect from Ubuntu to Windows Server 2008. I can use SMB, SMB2, or NFS.

Andreas, On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 03:37:07PM +0200, awl1 via samba wrote: > Before I follow your advice to move this whole issue/topic to the > samba-technical alias and start over there with a clean description of the > scenario and the findings, I have two simple questions: > > 1) I plan to use a new, reproducible test scenario with 2000 random small > files with a file length

Hi I've a Windows 2008 R1 connected to a share on a samba 3.5.6 (this samba is a domain member of a samba pdc). All work fine. I've enabled "max protocol = smb2" : i can access the share but when it was impossible to rename a new directory named "New Folder" on the share (created by Windows new folder menu). I've the error : init_smb_request: invalid wct

I did not set max protocol to SMB2 in smb.cnf, I don't want to force SMB2 selection if SMB3 can be used by a client. The machine is a Windows 7, so is SMB2 compliant. Le 22/07/2019 ? 11:44, Gaiseric Vandal via samba a ?crit?: > I would guess that changing the min protocol does not affect existing > connections unless you were to restart samba. > > Is the max protocol set to at

Hi Samba list! I was very excited that SMB2 is finally working with samba 3.6.0 - great job!! I just know that SMB2 has a smaller command set compared to SMB1 and this, beside many other rebuilds of the code makes it faster As I am completely new to the file transfer protocol world, I want to ask a few basic things: - is Samba backward compatible ... xp can't use SMB2 as far as I

Hello, I set client min protocol = SMB2 in my smb.cnf But I see some clients still connecting in NT1 (smbstatus) : smbstatus -p Mon Jul 22 11:39:36 2019 Samba version 4.8.3 PID???? Username???? Group Machine?????????????????????????????????? Protocol Version Encryption?????????? Signing

I have a classic NT4 domain with the PDC also the wins server. With the recent ransomware problem, we're trying to remove SMB1 and below protocols. However when I do this, the browse list is gone. Hosts can access properly the shares, but they have to know exactly \\machine\share in order to to connect. The same thing from a linux client: smbclient -L {PDC} -m SMB2 Domain=[{MYDOMAIN}]

Greetings list, I just upgraded to samba 3.6.0 trying SMB2. Though Windows 2008 R2 can work with SMB2 shares just fine, I'm unable to access SMB2 shares with mount.cifs or smbclient, even with "-m smb2" specified -- I get this "Unrecognised protocol level smb2", whereas smbclient comes with samba-client-3.6.0-63.1.rpm. So is this supported yet (from client side) or I

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 01:08:31PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:05:44PM +0100, Markus Doits wrote: > > > > On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: > > > I am using Samba 4.1.16 with smb2/3 and symbolic links are working alright. > > > > > > Following the smb.conf man page, I use: > > > > > > unix extensions

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 01:20:05PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:16:34PM +0100, Ralph B?hme wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 01:08:31PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:05:44PM +0100, Markus Doits wrote: > > > > > > > > On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: > > > > > I am using

On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: > I am using Samba 4.1.16 with smb2/3 and symbolic links are working alright. > > Following the smb.conf man page, I use: > > unix extensions = no > wide links = yes > > Unfortunately this still does not work for me - can you really make a symbolic link ("ln -s ...") when you are connected with smb2/3? Does

I am trying to setup a SAMBA server using 3.5.0rc2 to test SMB2. Without using SMB2, my windows 7 was able to browse the public share listed on the server anonymously. However, when SMB2 is enabled, a network error message is always popped up when I try to browse the samba server from Win 7. I have looked at the trace. It seemed to me that Win 7 had troubles accessing wkssvc, srvsvc, etc.

The problem is that I don't want it to use the IP address, but to use the hostname. Regards, - Mike ? ? -----Original Message----- From: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Rowland Penny Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 10:38 AM To: samba at lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] smbclient 4.0.7 resolves host name to IP

Dear all, what is about the support for POSIX ACL in Samba protocol implementation of SMB2 and SMB3? >From what I extracted from SNIA and SambaXP developer conference talks and as well as the official Samba Wiki, support for POSIX ACL in SMB2 and SMB3 has been completely abandonned. Am I right? If so, is there any other possibility to allow Linux Clients to natively access access control lists

hi All, We have a glusterfs cluster with 5 nodes on Ubuntu 12.04 amd64. We use this smb.conf: [global] socket options = IPTOS_THROUGHPUT TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=131072 SO_RCVBUF=131072 read raw = yes server string = %h write raw = yes #oplocks = yes max xmit = 131072 dead time = 15 getwd cache = yes use sendfile=yes block size = 131072 load printers = no aio read size

I have a customer running AIX 6.1 and using pware Samba 3.0.28, and they are looking to install a SMB2/3 compatible version on their AIX server. I found this link https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/AIX_building_samba and understand that it requires xlC 13.1 and a lot of RPMs. Since this customer does not have a current AIX support contract I think it's unlikely that we'll be able to get the

Second request ... Thank you in advance ... - Mike Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 2:16 PM To: samba at lists.samba.org Subject: smbclient 4.0.7 resolves host name to IP address for SMB2 but not NT1 We are having issues with smbclient 4.0.7 not working to clusters, because it's resolving the host name ( 'default service = dev3k1.my.domain.com' in smb.conf file ) to an IP address

Hi all, At the moment we are running Debian squeeze with stock samba 3.5.6. and are testing some new samba installations from ubuntu 12.04, centos 6.4 and debian wheezy. All running in a VM on a XenServer. The samba servers are member of a 2008R2 domain, using smb1 protocol all are running fine and we get a constant 90MB/s (big file transfer) on our 1GB network. We would like to enable smb2

Hello, We are running some legacy software that instructs us to, via Windows registry settings, disable all oplocks and SMB2 entirely on each Windows workstation that connects to the Samba share where the software is hosted. The software maintainers give dire warners of corruption, etc., if oplocks (and SMB2) are left enabled. We?ve run this software off of a Samba share for 20 years and have

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 09:03:41AM -0800, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > > Check out the latest cifsfs code. I think Steve > and Aurelian and Ronnie added an ioctl for this. > > I'm here at Vault in Boston with Steve, I'll ask > him :-). Steve says there are two utilities in Linux, getcifsacl and setcifsacl that use a custom ioctl inside the Linux cifsfs kernel