similar to: Oplocks

hi all , having isues with creating a ajax call in my simple rails application , can any body be available for some time to help on mail or chat ?? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Another issue for which there might be some tricks that I don't know of: I have a set of ports on my local machine forwarded (via ssh LocalForward) to machines that I can't directly reach on the localhost. However, as I connect to those machines I get HostKey warnings since it looks for the HostKey of the 'localhost' and depending on the port, it is of course different. Is there

I am getting the following build break on changeset 13662. I am compiling on x86_64 SLES10 with gcc 4.1.0. Is there a fix for this? Thanks, Aravindh Puthiyaparambil Xen Development Team Unisys, Tredyffrin PA make[1]: Entering directory `/root/xen/xen-unstable.hg/tools/firmware'' make[2]: Entering directory `/root/xen/xen-unstable.hg/tools/firmware/rombios'' gcc -o biossums

Hi, For the unsorted attributeID values errors, can you first try: samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix --yes 'fix_replmetadata_unsorted_attid' There's too much going on, and it does look like it might be bailing out. Running it with 'fix_replmetadata_unsorted_attid' should fix those first errors, then it will probably be easier to figure out what is happening. The

Hello, Updated samba from 4.4.5 to 4.5.0. All DC's are Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS. I install samba from source(./configure,make,make install). Looking at the release notes I see the section on "replPropertyMetaData Chnages". I run 'samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix --yes' and see the errors and samba attempts to fix. ERROR: unsorted attributeID values in

Hi Volker and many thanks for your response According to your questions >Please remove the SO_RCVBUF and SO_SNDBUF entries. >Oh, that's ancient. Do you have any possibility to move to >"security=user"? The smb.conf file was inherited from HP-UX system. Ok, I'll remove them >Did you try "posix locking = no"? That is mostly criticial >if

Dear all, > Caveats > ======= > Features which OCFS2 does not support yet: > - extended attributes > - readonly mount > - shared writeable mmap > - loopback is supported, but data written will not > be cluster coherent. > - quotas > - cluster aware flock <---------------------------------------- >

Dovecot Team, I'd like to report a number of bugs, that are to my view all critical. System: Replicated on multiple Debian 10 (Buster) systems Dovecot Version(s): 2.3.4.1 doveadm-sync -1/general 1) If DIRNAMEs are not different between command line and mail_location doveadm sync will fail, saying that the source and destination directories are the same 2) The -n / -N flags do not work,

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I get this error now and then, but only for users, that share or use shared mailboxes. See this snippet: 2015-05-22 02:27:09 IMAP(<uid1>) [28776]: Info: Disconnected: Logged out in=21450 out=76933 2015-05-22 02:27:09 IMAP(<uid1>) [28774]: Info: Disconnected: Logged out in=3769 out=16379 2015-05-22 02:27:09 IMAP(<uid1>) [28770]:

Hello Timo, I have scheduled some time to carry through the test requested by Aki. I will add responding to you as part of that process. Not sure if I have said or done anything to offend you, as your tone appears quite abrasive, even where you do not have an actual response to an observation. It is my view that it is a privilege to provide an open source platform, and therefore a

(Samba 3.0.21c / kernel 2.4.27 / Debian Sarge) Hello, One of my user open a file (located on a SAMBA server) in its application, and when he tries to save it, he gets a "share violation" error. (other people have this problem too). This error happens since I upgraded the SAMBA server from 3.0.14a to 3.0.21c. smbstatus for this file: 32613 DENY_WRITE 0x20089 RDONLY

Hi. I added a disk to a hardware raid 5 array and now i want to expand the LVM physical volume. There are now 4 sas 146GB disks in the server. The virtual disk /dev/sdb from the raid controller has been resized successfully with the server management software osma. [root at srv1 ~]# fdisk -l /dev/sdb Disk /dev/sdb: 438.4 GB, 438489317376 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 53309 cylinders

Dovecot Team, I'd like to report a number of bugs, that are to my view all critical. System: Replicated on multiple Debian 10 (Buster) systemsDovecot Version(s): 2.3.4.1 doveadm-sync -1/general 1) If DIRNAMEs are not different between command line and mail_location doveadm sync will fail, saying that the source and destination directories are the same 2) The -n / -N flags do not work, and a

On 9/18/2016 6:23 PM, Garming Sam wrote: > Hi, > > For the unsorted attributeID values errors, can you first try: > > samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix --yes 'fix_replmetadata_unsorted_attid' > > There's too much going on, and it does look like it might be bailing > out. Running it with 'fix_replmetadata_unsorted_attid' should fix those > first

On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:33:57AM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: >>@Michael: move the kernel oplocks setting to the global section, then things may start to work as expected. > >With kernel oplocks = yes in [global] but without mentioning >smb2 leases, this thing behaves in a way similar to when setting >smb2 leases to no (also globally, as it is a global parameter), -- >I see

Hi, I see samba with ctdb locking has following mapping when kernel oplocks = yes. share mode reservations = flock(2) posix byte range locking = fcntl(2) SMB locks (mandatory) = ctdb using brlock.tdb oplocks = fcntl(2) using F_SETLEASE Am I correct or I am missing something? I hope only SMB range locks are implemented with tdb, all else are being used from filesystem. What

Your report is most appreciated, though it lacked quite a lot of detail that could've expedited the investigation why it happened. With the further information we can hopefully figure out why you are experiencing the problems you reported. There is no offense intended. Aki On 10.7.2019 14.01, Arnold Opio Oree via dovecot wrote: > Hello Timo, > > I have scheduled some time to carry

I'm running R 2.7.1 with Tinn-R 2.0.0.7 and Windows XP Professional. I have write privileges to the folders containing my R installation, my Tinn-R installation, and my Tinn-R initialization settings. I installed R first, followed by Tinn-R. I have modified my RProfile.site file (in Tinn-R, R>Configure>Permanent). My previous installations of Tinn-R and R worked fine, but on a

Hi guys We were talking a little while ago about putting together some content to provide more examples of operations for first-time users. One of the other thoughts that's come up is about the design of the Xapian site; we've a bit of spare designer capacity at work and were wondering if we could do you a jazz-ed up site design (for free) and wondered if this'd be something the

Hi guys In our implementation of Xapian for one of our sites, we index the title, subtitle, summary and table of contents of around 200,000 products on ReportBuyer.com. When we create each Xapian doc to index this information, we apply a weighting to each of these 'fields' and add these to the doc using index_text with the second parameter passing in a weighting. I've been asked if