similar to: Settings up a Domain Member server, to act as a file server

Hi, This is the first time i've tried to register a samba server to a domain (previously i've connected using another program, likewise, i think). I've been following http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/domain-member.html#id2571111 I got to the point where i've configured smb.conf [global]: realm = domain.internal workgroup = DOMAIN password server

>From comments in http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24815572/why-does-function-c-accept-an-undocumented-argument/24815653 : The code of c() and unlist() was formerly shared but has been (long time passing) separated. From July 30, 1998, is where do_c got split into do_c and do_unlist. With the implementation of 'c.Date' in R devel r71350, an argument named 'use.names' is

Hi Everyone, I''ve been looking into the different hypervisors that''re available, and i''ve noticed the Xen project and the XenServer by Citrix. Is there a difference? Or am i looking at an old website? Because the version on xen.org is 3.5.4 and the version on citrix is 5.5. Thanks, Matthew Millar

The Free Software Foundation maintains a list of free and GPL-compatible software licenses here: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#Unlicense It appears that Unlicense is considered a free and GPL-compatible license; however, the page does suggest using CC0 instead (which is indeed a license approved / recognized by CRAN). CC0 appears to be the primary license recommended by the

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 7:39 AM, Karl Millar <kmillar at google.com> wrote: > It's not always clear when it's safe to remove the DLL. > > The main problem that I'm aware of is that native objects with > finalizers might still exist (created by R_RegisterCFinalizer etc). > Even if there are no live references to such objects (which would be > hard to verify), it

Thanks. Couldn't you implement model.matrix(..., sparse = TRUE) with a small amount of R code similar to MatrixModels::model.Matrix ? On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: >>>>>> Karl Millar via R-devel <r-devel at r-project.org> >>>>>> on Fri, 26 Feb 2016 15:58:20 -0800 writes: > >

Dear R-Users, I can't understand the behaviour of quasibinomial in lmer. It doesn't appear to be calculating a scaling parameter, and looks to be reducing the standard errors of fixed effects estimates when overdispersion is present (and when it is not present also)! A simple demo of what I'm seeing is given below. Comments appreciated? Thanks, Russell Millar Dept of Stat U.

Apologies if this issue has already been addressed. But it isn't plain, even using sshd -d -d -d, why function allowed_user would return 0. In my case, an old version of login was ignoring the expiry-date field of /etc/shadow, but sshd was refusing access. There are several reasons why access might be refused, and it shouldn't be necessary to modify auth.c to print out the info - it

Hi, I'd imagine by now it has already been reported, and possibly there is another thread already regarding the problem, that the wine repository for ubuntu 8.10 hasn't been updated to include the latest development version of wine (1.1.11). Is this a known problem? If so, is there a fix to be able to download 1.1.11 via repository? Thanks, Matthew Millar

>>>>> Karl Millar via R-devel <r-devel at r-project.org> >>>>> on Fri, 26 Feb 2016 15:58:20 -0800 writes: > Generating a model matrix with very large numbers of > columns overflows the stack and/or runs very slowly, due > to the implementation of TrimRepeats(). > This patch modifies it to use Rf_duplicated() to find the >

It does, but you'd still be relying on the R code ensuring that all of these objects are dead prior to unloading the DLL, otherwise they'll survive the GC. Maybe if the package counted how many such objects exist, it could work out when it's safe to remove the DLL. I'm not sure that it can be done automatically. What could be done is to to keep the DLL loaded, but remove it from

Hello, a while ago I wrote the http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_and_configure_file_shares HowTo. When I wrote the HowTo, I setup and configured the share on a DC - what still works like described. Today I tried the first time to do exactly the same on a 4.0.10 and 4.1.0 _member server_, and it doesn't work there. The share in smb.conf: [demo] path = /srv/samba/Demo read only

In Splus c() and unlist() called the same C code, but with a different 'sys_index' code (the last argument to .Internal) and c() did not consider an argument named 'use.names' special. > c function(..., recursive = F) .Internal(c(..., recursive = recursive), "S_unlist", TRUE, 1) > unlist function(data, recursive = T, use.names = T) .Internal(unlist(data, recursive

Package: xen-utils-3.2-1 Version: 3.2.1-2 Severity: important Please can you add python-xml as a dependancy for xen-utils-3.2-1 on lenny and above. Without python-xml a dependancy for "xm new" isn't satified. Thanks, Matthew Millar -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.7 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux

In S-PLUS 3.4 help on 'c' (http://www.uni-muenster.de/ZIV.BennoSueselbeck/s-html/helpfiles/c.html), there is no 'use.names' argument. Because 'c' is a generic function, I don't think that changing formal arguments is good. In R devel r71344, 'use.names' is not an argument of functions 'c.Date', 'c.POSIXct' and 'c.difftime'. Could

On 18.01.2017 00:13, Karl Millar wrote: > Please don't use 'Unlimited' or 'Unlimited + ...'. > > Google's lawyers don't recognize 'Unlimited' as being open-source, so > our policy doesn't allow us to use such packages due to lack of an > acceptable license. To our lawyers, 'Unlimited + file LICENSE' means > something very different

Unfortunately, our lawyers say that they can't give legal advice in this context. My question would be, what are people looking for that the MIT or 2-clause BSD license don't provide? They're short, clear, widely accepted and very permissive. Another possibility might be to dual-license packages with both an OSI-approved license and whatever-else-you-like, e.g. 'MIT |

I'd expect that a lot of the performance overhead could be eliminated by simply improving the underlying code. IMHO, we should ignore it in deciding the API that we want here. On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Henrik Bengtsson <henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com> wrote: > I'd vote for it to stay. It could of course suprise someone who'd > expect c(list(a=1), b=2, use.names =

Is anybody using ACT P104 phone? I just received mine and I've noticed that Web-interface setting has setting called "Line Key Settings" ; ten buttona setting from M1 to M10 with options for each one: Key Type: (x)Line ( )One Touch Dial Telephone Number: The manual does not mention anything about this function. Can these keys be configured like an extensions; if so how to access

I'd vote for it to stay. It could of course suprise someone who'd expect c(list(a=1), b=2, use.names = FALSE) to generate list(a=1, b=2, use.names=FALSE). On the upside, is the performance gain from using use.names=FALSE. Below benchmarks show that the combining of the names attributes themselves takes ~20-25 times longer than the combining of the integers themselves. Also, at no