similar to: help installing samba 3.0.37 on solairs 9 server

makepkg.sh script fails can anyone help? Gregory Jones Unix System Administrator CSC - Exelon Account gregory.jones at exeloncorp.com 847-975-3948 ----------------------------------------- ************************************************** This e-mail and any of its attachments may contain Exelon Corporation proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to

I am getting these errors running: sh makepkg.sh can anyone help? ===============================================? root# ?sh makepkg.sh Distribution base:? /var/tmp/samba-3.0.37 Temp install dir:?? /tmp/samba-3.0.37-build Install directory:? /opt/samba mkdir: Failed to make directory "/tmp/samba-3.0.37-build"; File exists make: Fatal error: Don't know how to make target

any body had any issues with samba on solaris8 ( sparc ) which version is advisable thanks

Hi, I downloaded 3.0.20 from samba.org, ran makepkg.sh to create samba pkg for Solaris. The install base for the new version locates in /opt/samba and the smbd locates in /etc/samba. I tried to modify the makepkg.sh to put everything under /usr/local/samba as follow: Delete: ==== --localstatedir=/var/lib/samba \ --with-piddir=/var/run \

I am attempting to successfully run the buildpkg.sh script which is located in the contrib/solaris directory. I am receiving the following error: Building pkginfo file... Building prototype file... Building package.. ## Building pkgmap from package prototype file. ## Processing pkginfo file. pkgmk: ERROR: parameter <VERSION> cannot be null ## Packaging was not successful. pkgtrans: ERROR:

This is the output of ./buidpkg.sh of openssh-3.1p1 on "SunOS 5.6 Generic_105181-17 sun4m sparc SUNW,SPARCstation-20" Building pkginfo file... Building prototype file... Building package.. ## Building pkgmap from package prototype file. ## Processing pkginfo file. pkgmk: ERROR: parameter <VERSION> cannot be null ## Packaging was not successful. pkgtrans: ERROR: unable to complete

if [ ! -f /opt/sldx/slwo/openssh-3.1p1/openssh-3.1p1/contrib/solaris/package/usr/local/etc/moduli ]; then \ if [ -f /opt/sldx/slwo/openssh-3.1p1/openssh-3.1p1/contrib/solaris/package/usr/local/etc/primes ]; then \ echo "moving /opt/sldx/slwo/openssh-3.1p1/openssh-3.1p1/contrib/solaris/package/usr/local/etc/primes to /opt/sldx/

Ben, I am trying to create a package for Openssh.3-1p1, but the /contrib/solaris/buildpkg.sh script failes with the following errors: ./mkinstalldirs /tools/OpenSSH/openssh-3.1p1/contrib/solaris/package/usr/local/b in mkdir /tools/OpenSSH/openssh-3.1p1/contrib/solaris/package/usr/local/bin ./mkinstalldirs /tools/OpenSSH/openssh-3.1p1/contrib/solaris/package/usr/local/s bin mkdir

I am trying to build/install libguestfs from git. My box is Archlinux, GCC 4.9.1 and all dev tools installed. If I manually $ gitclone gitUrl $ cd libguestfs $ ./autogen.sh $ ./configure --someOptions the build goes until the end and leaves me with binaries. ------------------------------ --- Now I want to install it properly on my machine. Arch use a makepkg [1] command to build and install

I am using rw0613b with djtools on Win95. No problem with makefiles building fortran and C dll's, plus can build R.exe with the supplied libraries (including mva). Why then do I get the following error when I try to building an existing library separately, eg... (/R-0.61.3/src/gnuwin32)$ make -f MakePkg -C ../library/mva PKG=mva make.exe: Entering directory `c:/R-0.61.3/src/library/mva'

> There's probably a dependency missing. Look closely at the > ./configure output and the README file. > I have checked all packages in README and libguestfs/appliance/packagelist. All are installed. > > You should test this first of all by building from source, and > without installing, I first run makepkg, so no install > > ./run guestfish -N fs -m /dev/sda1

Dear R-helpers, I'm learning how to compile R packages with fortran routines and use the acepack source as an example. After some hiccups (Guido told me about the need to set make_mode=UNIX) I got to the following: `make pkg-acepack' runs without error (see below), but it does not * compile any .f file in acepack/src * (hence) try to create any dll file or libs (I'm

OK, I feel like an idiot, but I can't get 3.1p1 to compile under Solaris 8. Older versions I've gotten set up, but can't with this latest one. I have followed both the general directions and the directions in contrib/solaris, and neither one works. Since I have Solaris, here's the output from the directions in contrib/solaris... ./configure --with-pam

Hello, I am having a problem compiling R versions 1.6.1 or .16.2 on a Solaris 8 machine. It sees to have problems with an X11 module. Here is the relevant output: make[4]: Entering directory `/pkg-ling/src/R-1.6.2/src/modules/X11' gcc -I. -I../../../src/include -I../../../src/include -I/pkg/X11R5/include -I/usr/local/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -fPIC -g -O2 -c dataentry.c -o dataentry.lo

My current version is supermin 5.1.8-1 > > If the tests *don't* run successfully, then you've most likely found a > bug in supermin. That has to be fixed before continuing. > tests failed. See the log below. ========================================== supermin 5.1.9: tests/test-suite.log ========================================== # TOTAL: 8 # PASS: 5 # SKIP: 0 # XFAIL:

The trailing backslash seems to be the culprit. After looking at rw1020\bin\INSTALL, I noticed $pkg =~ s/\/$//; which I assume is to strip the trailing slash from a package name before obtaining the package name and cleaning out its directory I added $pkg =~ s/\\$//; immediately after this line. Rerunning Rcmd INSTALL C:\rw1011\src\library\bqtl\ with that change seemed to work OK

I've just had the error below while trying to install a package from source under R2.2.1 and Windows XP. I recall encountering this sporadically in the past. It is a pretty confusing message and took me quite some time to figure out; I've seen queries about it on the R site search, but couldn't find a reply. There's an attempted diagnosis and suggested cure below.

Hello Jeremy and samba maintainers, I am using Samba 3.0.37 and I am confused about the license. On one hand both the COPYING file in the 3.0.37 tarball and your website indicates that version 3.0.37 is GPLv2. http://news.samba.org/announcements/samba_gplv3/ On the other hand, in the 3.0.37 tarball, there are many files with GPLv3 headers without any exception. For instance, several file in

Dear R-help, I was able to build R-1.5.0 on WinNT w/o problem (actually it seems easier than previous version). However, I encountered problem when trying to compile the recommended package foreign: make: Entering directory `/cygdrive/g/rbuild/R-1.5.0/src/gnuwin32' make DLLNM= FLIBS="-lg2c -lRblas" BUILD=MINGW \ -C G:/Rbuild/R-1.5.0-recommended/R.INSTALL/foreign PKG=foreign

Hi, I have a problem with the filesize of the samba 3.0.0 package. after compiling the source of the samba-3.0.0 i made the "sh makepkg.sh". the package i got was about 901 MB. does anybody know why the package is as great as mine and what can i do to get a samba package which is smaller than the package i have. i compiled under solaris 8. i made all what samba.org says that i