similar to: When do you End of Life older Samba versions ?

On 4/22/19 10:18 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 09:48:31 -0400 > Paul Griffith via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >>    I am running into an issue mounting a Samba share from our Linux >> server. We are running Samba 4.8.8 on CentOS  7.6.1810. I have done a >> some testing, and I can't get the

Folks: Having an issue with samba 3.0.24 on a Sun Sparc Solaris 10 box compiled with gcc version 3.4.6. On these systems I'm constantly getting the following two lines in the log.smbd file: [2007/04/16 10:20:19, 0] param/loadparm.c:map_parameter(2690) Unknown parameter encountered: "client code page" [2007/04/16 10:20:19, 0] param/loadparm.c:lp_do_parameter(3420) Ignoring

On Fri, 3 May 2019 15:36:59 +0200 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hai Paul, > > Look at this: user=paulg,uid=2381 > (from mount -t cifs //xxxx.xxxx.yorku.ca/homes /tmp/1 -o > user=paulg,uid=2381,gid=1000,domain=AD.ONE.EXAMPLE.CA) > > Now, look at this : > > idmap config * : backend = tdb > > idmap config * :

On Mon, 6 May 2019 10:33:27 -0400 Paul Griffith <paulg at eecs.yorku.ca> wrote: > On 5/3/19 9:53 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Fri, 3 May 2019 15:36:59 +0200 > > "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> Hai Paul, > >> > >> Look at this: user=paulg,uid=2381 > >> (from mount

> On Oct 13, 2023, at 2:55?PM, hvjunk <hvjunk at gmail.com> wrote: > > What I guess the OP "wants" is to say that version 9.5 will be supported for the next 3-5 years, and all the security patches be backported from versions 11,12,13,14,15 to 9.5.3-patch1234 etc. Since OpenSSH/etc. haven't changed the wire protocol in like 20odd years, I don't personally see a

Q: What type of changes, "incompatibilities" do you see, or experience, that would require something like that? Tomcat: i't s a "platform" where newer technologies (ie. JDK version N+3) could introduce unexpected problems for business apps that runs on that platform to have security for a period. Postgresql: as new features (ie. logical replication, and partitioning)

On 3 March 2017 at 11:34, John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk> wrote: > On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Tony Mountifield wrote: > >> You mean just thrown away, or archived somewhere? Just thrown away would >> seem rather irresponsible... > > > Mirroring EPEL makes sense well before this point, as they don't keep old > versions of packages online either AFAIK. >

Just a message to remind everyone that CentOS-5 has an End of Life date of March 31, 2017. This means that there will be no new security updates released by Red Hat for RHEL-5 after that date. Sometime in early April, the current 5.11 tree will be moved onto vault.centos.org (like CentOS-3 and CentOS-4 have been since their EOL). Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A

Am 01.03.2017 um 12:28 schrieb Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>: > > Just a message to remind everyone that CentOS-5 has an End of Life date > of March 31, 2017. > > This means that there will be no new security updates released by Red > Hat for RHEL-5 after that date. > > Sometime in early April, the current 5.11 tree will be moved onto > vault.centos.org

Hi Guys Im hoping someone would be so kind to answer my question. Where I work we are currently reviewing and making use of Centos, because of its long end of life support. CentOS-6 updates until November 30, 2020 The question I would like to ask is. Say Centos 6 offers and makes use of PHP 5.3. Say as time goes on PHP themselves deprecate 5.3 and EOL is reached. Would Centos 6 continue to

On 3/1/2017 7:28 PM, Tom Munro Glass wrote: > > Can you say exactly when in early April the tree will be moved? I have > a number of installations that need to continue running CentOS 5 so > I'd like to do a final update before the tree moves. may I suggest building your own mirror well before then, update it with rsync or lftp weekly (or even daily), from

Sorry, I should have been more clear. Just wondering in general if there is a policy, not as any kind of library. Below are more examples from that website of tools, servers and services. It?s possible there still isn?t a timeframe but wondering about general end-of-life expectations even if there have been only cursory discussions. https://endoflife.date/ansible-core

In article <CAGkb5vexU7eoU=-ASF_uPN_PA68QQi2RU0HdPhozZEYDE0VqEg at mail.gmail.com>, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: > > This is especially important if you use anything from EPEL as EPEL5 will be > removed when RHEL goes EOL. You mean just thrown away, or archived somewhere? Just thrown away would seem rather irresponsible... Cheers Tony -- Tony

In article <CAGkb5vfXkJcbpQWupuZG0xp8_gTgv+55+YrZf8VdF0maiO9UfQ at mail.gmail.com>, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: > On 3 March 2017 at 11:47, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 3 March 2017 at 11:34, John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk> wrote: > >> On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Tony Mountifield wrote: > >> >

Hi All,    I am running into an issue mounting a Samba share from our Linux server. We are running Samba 4.8.8 on CentOS  7.6.1810. I have done a some testing, and I can't get the root cause of the error. Testing: CentOS 7.6 client -> Samba server, mounting fails - mount.cfs mount error(13): Permission denied CentOS 7.6 client -> Win10 desktop share, mounting works Fedora 29

Greetings Samba Users, I have a strange issue. Adobe Reader can't print to a Samba printer. It would be funny except it is happening to me.... Adobe Reader can't print PDF files to a true Adobe PS3 printer but GhostView can print PDF files without any problems. The printer in question is a Ricoh Aficio AP4510. I tried Samba v3.0.11 and v3.0.20 and I get the same result, no printer

On 02/03/17 19:50, James Hogarth wrote: > On 2 Mar 2017 03:49, "John R Pierce" <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: > > On 3/1/2017 7:28 PM, Tom Munro Glass wrote: >> >> Can you say exactly when in early April the tree will be moved? I have a >> number of installations that need to continue running CentOS 5 so I'd like >> to do a final update before

Hello, I am testing Samba 4.9.7 before we upgrade our 4.8 domain member server. I am running into a weird permission error with our test server. My home directory is NFS mounted. The problem comes from a mail directory in my home directory.  I can't access it over SMB/CIFS, it gives me a permission error. From another Linux host that has our home directories NFS mounted, I can access it

Greetings CentOS users, I have run into a hardware issue with the Intel 965 chipset. It appears that the latest kernel doesn't support the Marvell PATA controller. I can kickstart the computer, but after the OS is installed the DVD drive can't be accessed. There are patches against 2.6.18 for the Marvell PATA controller here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/16/157 There is bug

For some reason, our HP8150DN printers hang with this error and require power-cycling after a user tries to print any job from Windows2000 or NT (including a test page). The Samba server is running 2.2.5 on a Solaris 2.6 box using Sun's printing system. It forwards all jobs to another Solaris machine that runs LPRng-3.8.2 and ifhp-3.5.1. I am able to install and use all of our printers