similar to: Problem accessing a share on a W2008 server via smbclient

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Problem accessing a share on a W2008 server via smbclient"

2011 Jan 02
1
Realtime SIP, multiple AX servers question
We have several Asterisk servers (1.6.2.15) all configured for Realtime, all backed by the same database. The Asterisk servers are all listed under DNS SRV records, and SIP ATAs find us this way. Normally, no matter which Asterisk server an ATA connects to, we get our database fields filled out correctly, such as "regseconds", "lastms", "ipadr", etc. However, with
2011 May 30
3
Join W2008 R2 64bit to samba 3.5.8
Just a short question: How can a W2008 R2 64 bit Server be joined to samba 3.5.8 Domain? ----------------------------------------------- EDV Daniel M?ller Leitung EDV Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus Paul-Lechler-Str. 24 72076 T?bingen Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499 eMail: mueller at tropenklinik.de Internet: www.tropenklinik.de -----------------------------------------------
2010 Oct 23
0
%a switch for windows7 und w2008 server?
Hi I have found this switch for seperating profiles in a mixed windows version environment You can also take full advantage of Samba's Variable Substitutions and further separate User's profiles, such as by architecture. Using the directive: * logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U\%a will separate the user's profiles relating to each version of Windows, such as WinXP, WinNT, etc.
2010 Sep 08
0
migrating from Samba 3 PDC to W2008 AD
Hi all, I already can successfully join Samba 3 (3.3.x) server to AD domain and setup winbind service to see domain users on linux server. The main problem for me is that I want to save all already existing uids and gids on linux server without any change. Firstly, I can map domain user to unix user with "username map" option vova = CORP\vova But this trick doesn't work for
2015 Jun 12
1
Samba 4.1.17 Raise domain level to w2008 R2
El 12/06/15 a les 14:47, joseph-andre Guaragna ha escrit: > official documentation on samba describe this situation: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_functional_levels > Meilleures salutations / Best regards, There's also this issue: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2013-July/174639.html (even if time synchronization seems to work fine). Bye -- Luca
2014 Dec 17
1
Samba4 domain function level W2008 R2
Dear all, could someone explain in short about raising the domain function level to W 2008 R2. I thougt I did provision my samba4 DC as W2008 R2 function level, but my domain level show has an output like??: samba-tool domain level show Domain and forest function level for domain 'DC=tplk,DC=loc' Forest function level: (Windows) 2003 Domain function level: (Windows) 2003 Lowest function
2015 Jun 12
3
Samba 4.1.17 Raise domain level to w2008 R2
Dear all, My , samba-tool domain level show shows me it is W2003: [root at s4master ~]# samba-tool domain level show Domain and forest function level for domain 'DC=tplk,DC=loc' Forest function level: (Windows) 2003 Domain function level: (Windows) 2003 Lowest function level of a DC: (Windows) 2008 R2 Can I raise without issues to W 2008 R2? Or should I stay with 2003? Greetings
2010 Jul 26
2
chan_skinny still maintained?
Hi, I've managed to acquire a few Cisco handsets (7905, 7920) and would like to use them with Asterisk. Rather than simply switching to the SIP firmware I thought I'd use these with chan_skinny - partly because this is Cisco's primary firmware and therefore the phones might be more stable, and partly to help test chan_skinny as it seems to be generally underused. (Is functionality
2017 Mar 17
7
Saving Compile Time in InstCombine
Hi, One of the most time-consuming passes in LLVM middle-end is InstCombine (see e.g. [1]). It is a very powerful pass capable of doing all the crazy stuff, and new patterns are being constantly introduced there. The problem is that we often use it just as a clean-up pass: it's scheduled 6 times in the current pass pipeline, and each time it's invoked it checks all known patterns. It
2004 Mar 22
1
smbclient won't tar empty directories
Hello, I guess this question has been asked several times, but unfortenuately I don't find an answer neither in the search machines nor in the groups. I backup my windows clients using smbclient with the tar option. Works great, but no empty directories are in the created tar file. I read the smblient and tar's manpage, without finding the necessary option. Does anybody know how I can
2006 Feb 14
1
smbclient -L misses some shares when using NULL-Sessions
List, while trying to list all shares in my network using smbclient I recognized that some shares are missing. ("hostname" is a Win2K Box). smbclient -L -U "" -N hostname shows no shares (using NULL-Session-Logon as you can see) if I use a windows box to connect to "hostname" using net use \\hostname "" /User:"" I can see all shares of this
2019 Jul 16
5
Syncing Sysvol
On 16/07/2019 16:40, Jonathon Reinhart wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 9:32 AM Rowland penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> On 16/07/2019 14:16, Jonathon Reinhart wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 9:11 AM Rowland penny via samba >>> <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>>> On 16/07/2019 14:02, Jonathon Reinhart wrote:
2017 Jan 04
1
smbclient in tar mode - no messages about files
I switched over from FreeBSD to Debian/Jessie - samba 4.2. On FreeBSD I used smblient in tar-mode to transfer files to another host. smbclient used to print the names of the files extracted on the remote host. I piped this to tee for logging. On Jessie this behaviour has vanished. There is only one message left that gives information about the server that I'm connecting to. I set the loglevel
2011 Apr 02
1
Xapian docs (was Re: Xapian-discuss Digest, Vol 83, Issue 2)
> I think this is a shining example of how well Xapian works with large > document collections. I was just discussing this with my colleagues here > and one of the issues that came up is that we'd love Xapian to become > really lot more popular but have found that the documentation's a bit > difficult to get into, as is the API. I agree. There are a few gotchas, as well
2017 Mar 18
4
Saving Compile Time in InstCombine
On 03/17/2017 04:30 PM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev wrote: > >> On Mar 17, 2017, at 11:50 AM, Mikhail Zolotukhin via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> One of the most time-consuming passes in LLVM middle-end is >> InstCombine (see e.g. [1]). It is a very powerful pass capable
2017 Mar 20
2
Saving Compile Time in InstCombine
> On Mar 17, 2017, at 6:12 PM, David Majnemer <david.majnemer at gmail.com> wrote: > > Honestly, I'm not a huge fan of this change as-is. The set of transforms that were added behind ExpensiveChecks seems awfully strange and many would not lead the reader to believe that they are expensive at all (the SimplifyDemandedInstructionBits and foldICmpUsingKnownBits calls being the
2019 Jul 13
2
rsync alternative -- smbclient?
As you may have noticed I am looking into containers? in order to minimize configuration I also started looking into options for sysvol replication. I am aware of the list at https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SysVol_replication_(DFS-R) Ignoring the robocopy option, essentially all of them use rsync, w/o ssh, w/o some extras like unison, osync, or lsyncd as Sven suggested, plus optionally defining a
2019 Jul 13
0
rsync alternative -- smbclient?
I, too have been looking into alternatives to the rsync-based sysvol replication workaround, and really liked the idea of using the existing Sysvol SMB share, rather than a secondary protocol (with its own authentication, etc). When I realized that Andrew Bartlett was a primary developer of both Samba and Rsync, I was even more surprised that Rsync doesn't support an smb:// URL. csync [1] is
2016 Nov 02
2
Samba and BTRFS server-side copy
Am 02.11.2016 um 15:50 schrieb Saint Germain via samba: > On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 14:44:05 +0100, Achim Gottinger via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote : >>>>> I just tried and when I limit samba to SMB2 connections (in >>>>> smb.conf), Nautilus/gvfs cannot connect (it doesn't even see the >>>>> share). >>>>>
2004 May 22
0
smbd disconnects when trying to write not-very-large files
Running Samba 3.0.4 on FreeBSD 5.2.1-p3, built from the BSD ports collection. I've got Samba up and running (as I have numerous times before with great success) and clients can connect, list files, read, rename, delete, etc. When trying to write a file, though, the server disconnects (and, apparently, the forked process that was started for the connection quits with no error). The