similar to: High CPU usage on 3.2.3

Hi all, I mounted by smbmount a partition on a winNT machine without problem... but when i tried to copy a file whitch have size more than 2 Gb i have the following error : Overflow size allowed for a file (translated from french ;-) :D?bordement de la taille permise pour un fichier ) PS. the file system of the harde drive is NTFS PS. The command of smbmount : /usr/sbin/smbmount

Hello, I am running a samba 3.0.32 under fedora core 9. I only try to authenticate users against a ldap server. Of course this server knows the encrypted password as microsoft does. I entered the ldap password using smbpasswd to query into the ldap. After this, I just obtain a message like "you don't have rights to ...". What errors do I make ??? Any ideas will be appreciated

Anybody know a tool to migrate smbpasswd to Ldap Backend, i trying using the pdbedit -i smbpasswd:/passwd -e ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1, but this don't works. Thanks in advance. Reggards, ---------------------------------- iarly Selbir ( Ski0s )

I've followed the OpenLDAP + SAMBA Domain Controller tutorial step-by-step: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=640760 And after long hours, and enless googling, I've yet to find a solution. LDAP works great SAMBA works great. But the intergration between them don't work. Here is the samba log: root:/etc# tail /var/log/samba/log.smbd smbd version 3.0.28a started. Copyright

Hello, I've just installed samba with ldap on a debian etch. I have a problem when i attempt to create a user with the command smbldap-useradd -a -P -c "toto DUPONT" -u 1001 toto and to log in with it after. I obtain this error : [2008/10/29 17:35:26, 0] passdb/pdb_get_set.c:pdb_get_group_sid(164) pdb_get_group_sid: Failed to find Unix account for toto [2008/10/29 17:35:26, 1]

Hello all, I'm new to OpenLDAP and a moderate Samba admin. My nights became not so good while trying to get running OpenLDAP + Samba as PDC on a Slackware 12.1 server... Well, the scenario is: I have a functional and already running OpenLDAP base that provides login for users on Web apps. My actual PDC is an old MS NT4 Server. I'm using the default Samba (v. 3.0.28a) installed by

Hi, this is kind of a strange situation. I have a share that I want to work like a drop box. I want users to be able to create new files and read existing files, but not be able to delete them (except for the owner of the dropbox). Does anyone know how to do this? I've tried every combination I could think of write list, read only, force group, and sticky bits on the directory itself.

Running Samba 3.2.3 on Debian Lenny, amd64. I'm joined to an AD realm, authentication works fine for Windows clients. I'm able to see that the clients are using Kerberos, not NTLM to authenticate to the shares. However when I look at the keytab, my entries have the short names like "service/shortname@REALM" instead of "service/fqdn@REALM". Looking at Windows servers on

Hi guys, I posted this question at virt list on Fedora Project but I guess its a best place to ask help for my problem. I'm trying to set up two kvm/libvirt hosts, I installed the set of packages contained in @kvm and @clustering groups, downloaded and installed glusterfs version 3.1.2, configured the cluster ( all working ), configured the gluster volume and mounted it on

I apologize if this is a really silly question but I've been messing with this for awhile now and cannot see any typos that would prevent these shares from showing up. I'm trying two things I've never done before so I want to make sure to point them out: 1) I am using groups in the "valid users" section 2) I am using preexec and postexec on each share Example: [Media]

I've been playing with a MIT powered DC. There are two DCs, an existing Heimdal based one running Samba 4.5 and a new MIT based one running 4.7.6. There are clients running Windows 7 and 10, a 2012R2 server, and a Samba 4.5 file server. Once the new MIT DC is brought online, clients can no longer connect to the Windows server by hostname. Connections still work via IP address which makes me

Hello people, My difficult is get "nss_ldap" compiled and running on my server. I download the tgz file from PADL Software Pty Ltd website, decompress/untar, and then run "./configure" . ./configure runs just fine with no error message. Things go bad when I type: make This is the output after I try to do "make": root@ldap:~/nss_ldap-262# make make all-am make[1]:

I'm attempting to get an old NT4 client participating in a Samba4 domain. Users can logon to the machine locally and access network shares on other machines in the network. However, no one can access shares on the NT4 machine using the machine name. Attempting this results in an error "The account is not authorized to log in from this station." Using the IP address does work however.

Samba 3.2.1 on linux OpenFiler 2.3 I have an external LDAP server with anonymous bind and pam ProFtpd linked to LDAP server works well without error But samba does not work, in smbd.log I have: [2008/09/09 22:01:54, 0] passdb/secrets.c:fetch_ldap_pw(888) fetch_ldap_pw: neither ldap secret retrieved! [2008/09/09 22:01:54, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_connect_system(952) ldap_connect_system:

Hello, i write because i have a doubt. I installed on an ubuntu server 12.04 64 bits the service nut with the command apt-get install nut. I configured nut and all is running fine except the shutdown the ups. I find a driver patch (source code) and it solves my problem. This i probe in a virtual machine with the same ubuntu, i compile and do the tests. My question is how i change in the production

Here is the general procedure to do this: First, you must compile nut yourself on ubuntu, with the patch, then rename the existing NUT binaries to backup files and copy over your modified binaries to where the original binaries were. However, since these patches are local, if the nut package maintainer for Ubuntu releases a new package, your patches will be overwritten. To fix this, after you

I'm running Samba 4.0.7 on CentOS 6.4 running double duty as DC and file server. OS X clients are taking a _long_ time to list long directories. One directory with 10K entries is taking 3-4 minutes to display the entries in Finder. I captured a few seconds worth of packets and noticed that it's doing three requests per file: 1. NTCreateAndX - just opens the file 2. Close 3. FIND_FIRST2 -

Running 4.1.6-SerNet-RedHat-7.el6 on CentOS 6.5. I've been bumping my head against GPO issues and am now wondering if its connected to my BUILTIN groups not mapping on my DC. For instance on DC: sh-4.1# wbinfo --gid-info=544 failed to call wbcGetgrgid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND Could not get info for gid 544 But on a member: sh-4.1# wbinfo --gid-info=544 BUILTIN\administrators:x:544:

I attempted to set up unsolicited remote assistance via group policy, but connections to the client machines fail. A network trace show the 'expert' machine doing a TGS-REQ to the DC which responds with a KRB5KDC_ERR_POLICY. This seems to be the origin of the problem. I noticed in the request, the username of the 'novice' is given as the Server Name but is otherwise pretty

Hi Ralph, Thanks for the reply and thank you for your work on vfs_fruit. On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Ralph Boehme <rb at sernet.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:40:32PM -0500, Ryan Bair wrote: > > I have a share with approximately 5000 folders in the base directory. The > > performance on an OS X client is somewhat less than exciting. I compiled