Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "question, pdc bdc on diferent subnet"
2008 Apr 23
3
profiles migrate
Hy , my english is bad,bad sorry
I need change a server pdc samba , and change too the domain name, so i
can't export users and sid .
Exist some tool to export and covert the old porfile to the new domain?
thanks
Maximo Monsalvo
2016 May 10
2
Ubuntu server 14.04 classic upgrade segmentation fault
El 10/05/16 a les 16:03, Maxnux ha escrit:
> attribute gecos does not exist
> Violación de segmento (`core' generado)
>
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11530
Bye
--
Luca Olivetti
Wetron Automation Technology http://www.wetron.es/
Tel. +34 93 5883004 (Ext.3010) Fax +34 93 5883007
2017 Feb 06
2
[PATCH] Optimize silk_warped_autocorrelation_FIX() for ARM NEON
Hi Jean-Marc,
Thanks a lot for reviewing this huge assembly function!
silk_warped_autocorrelation_FIX_c()'s kernel part is
for( n = 0; n < length; n++ ) {
tmp1_QS = silk_LSHIFT32( (opus_int32)input[ n ], QS );
/* Loop over allpass sections */
for( i = 0; i < order; i++ ) {
/* Output of allpass section */
tmp2_QS = silk_SMLAWB(
2017 Feb 07
2
[PATCH] Optimize silk_warped_autocorrelation_FIX() for ARM NEON
This is a great idea. But the order (psEncC->shapingLPCOrder) can be
configured to 12, 14, 16, 20 and 24 according to complexity parameter.
It's hard to get a universal function to handle all these orders
efficiently. Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Linfeng
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> wrote:
> Hi Linfeng,
>
> On 06/02/17 02:51 PM,
2017 Feb 07
3
[PATCH] Optimize silk_warped_autocorrelation_FIX() for ARM NEON
Hi Jean-Marc,
Thanks for your suggestions. Will get back to you once we have some updates.
Linfeng
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> wrote:
> Hi Linfeng,
>
> On 06/02/17 07:18 PM, Linfeng Zhang wrote:
> > This is a great idea. But the order (psEncC->shapingLPCOrder) can be
> > configured to 12, 14, 16, 20 and 24 according to
2017 Apr 05
2
[PATCH] Optimize silk_warped_autocorrelation_FIX() for ARM NEON
I attached a new patch with small cleanup (disassembly is identical as the
last patch). We have done the same internal testing as usual.
Also, attached 2 failed temporary versions which try to reduce code size
(just for code review reference purpose).
The new patch of silk_warped_autocorrelation_FIX_neon() has a code size of
3,228 bytes (with gcc).
smaller_slower.c has a code size of 2,304
2017 Apr 05
4
[PATCH] Optimize silk_warped_autocorrelation_FIX() for ARM NEON
Thank Jean-Marc!
The speedup percentages are all relative to the entire encoder.
Comparing to master, this optimization patch speeds up fixed-point SILK
encoder on NEON as following: Complexity 5: 6.1% Complexity 6: 5.8%
Complexity 8: 5.5% Complexity 10: 4.0%
when testing on an Acer Chromebook, ARMv7 Processor rev 3 (v7l), CPU max
MHz: 2116.5
Thanks,
Linfeng
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:02 AM,
2009 May 21
1
Error in smbldap-populate
HI, sorry my english and if this is a stupid question i am
newby in samba with ldap
Im install a clear install the ubuntu 9.04 server
follow this guide from ubuntu docs
https://help.ubuntu.com/9.04/serverguide/C/samba-ldap.html
https://help.ubuntu.com/9.04/serverguide/C/openldap-server.html
but i get this error when i try to populate samba
can somebody helpme?
administrador@server:~$ sudo
2017 Feb 06
0
[PATCH] Optimize silk_warped_autocorrelation_FIX() for ARM NEON
Hi Linfeng,
On 06/02/17 02:51 PM, Linfeng Zhang wrote:
> However, the critical thing is that all the states in each stage when
> processing input[i] are reused by the next input[i+1]. That is
> input[i+1] must wait input[i] for 1 stage, and input[i+2] must wait
> input[i+1] for 1 stage, etc.
That is indeed the tricky part... and the one I think you could do
slightly differently. If
2017 Feb 07
0
[PATCH] Optimize silk_warped_autocorrelation_FIX() for ARM NEON
Hi Linfeng,
On 06/02/17 07:18 PM, Linfeng Zhang wrote:
> This is a great idea. But the order (psEncC->shapingLPCOrder) can be
> configured to 12, 14, 16, 20 and 24 according to complexity parameter.
>
> It's hard to get a universal function to handle all these orders
> efficiently. Any suggestions?
I can think of two ways of handling larger orders. The obvious one is
2017 Apr 03
0
[PATCH] Optimize silk_warped_autocorrelation_FIX() for ARM NEON
Hi Jean-Marc,
Attached is the silk_warped_autocorrelation_FIX_neon() which implements
your idea.
Speed improvement vs the previous optimization:
Complexity 0-4: Doesn't call this function. Complexity 5: 2.1% (order = 16)
Complexity 6: 1.0% (order = 20) Complexity 8: 0.1% (order = 24) Complexity
10: 0.1% (order = 24)
Code size of silk_warped_autocorrelation_FIX_neon() changes from 2,644
2017 Apr 05
0
[PATCH] Optimize silk_warped_autocorrelation_FIX() for ARM NEON
Hi Linfeng,
Thanks for the updated patch. I'll have a look and get back to you. When
you report speedup percentages, is that relative to the entire encoder
or relative to just that function in C? Also, what's the speedup
compared to master?
Cheers,
Jean-Marc
On 05/04/17 12:14 PM, Linfeng Zhang wrote:
> I attached a new patch with small cleanup (disassembly is identical as
> the
2017 Apr 06
0
[PATCH] Optimize silk_warped_autocorrelation_FIX() for ARM NEON
Hi Linfeng,
I had a closer look at your patch and the code looks good -- and
slightly simpler than I had anticipated, so that's good.
I did some profiling on a Cortex A57 and I've been seeing slightly less
improvement than you're reporting, more like 3.5% at complexity 8. It
appears that the warped autocorrelation function itself is only faster
by a factor of about 1.35. That's a
2017 Jan 31
6
[PATCH] Optimize silk_warped_autocorrelation_FIX() for ARM NEON
Hi,
Attached is a patch with arm neon optimizations for
silk_warped_autocorrelation_FIX(). Please review.
Thanks,
Felicia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20170131/9a912bb4/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name:
2016 Jun 22
2
Ayuda sencilla (SQL)
Estoy en 3.3.0 y "sqldf" lo instala sin problemas...
El 23 de junio de 2016, 1:23, Mauricio Monsalvo <m.monsalvo en gmail.com>
escribió:
> Malas nuevas para mi:
> package ?sqldb? is not available (for R version 3.3.0)
> ¿Puedo hacer algo más que esperar? No me voy a "bajar" de versión de R.
>
> El 22 de junio de 2016, 20:02, Mauricio Monsalvo
2016 May 10
0
Ubuntu server 14.04 classic upgrade segmentation fault
El 10/05/16 a las 11:21, Luca Olivetti escribió:
> El 10/05/16 a les 16:03, Maxnux ha escrit:
>
>> attribute gecos does not exist
>> Violación de segmento (`core' generado)
>>
>
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11530
>
>
> Bye
thanks luca had already seen this bug but when I do a search with
ldapsearch can see the geckos entry
its the same
2016 Jun 01
1
samba 4 getent,wbinfo,ssh login and unix attributes
hello list
I have a ubuntu server 14.04 I made the upgrade with classicupgrade of
my old server 9.04, the server is working well and the information and
users successfully exported, also need users to the AD can be to log
ssh, i configure winbind in nsswitch, the user and password is acepted
but the connection is closed.
unix the attributes are configured correctlyin unix attribute,
Eg:
2017 Jan 06
4
que tal comunidad, una pregunta del paquete data.table
si se tiene un data.table (DT), supongamos de 100 filas por 3 columnas
de datos numericos, como puedo hacer para obtener el correspondiente
valor de la columna 1 si busco, por ejemplo, el maximo de la columna 2
agrupado por la columna 3 ?
para buscar el maximo de la columna 2 escribo.
DT[ , max(c2), by=c3 ]
muchas gracias,
saludos, eric.
--
Forest Engineer
Master in Environmental and
2018 Feb 10
2
Optimizar función
Buenas para tod en s, tengo una consulta para poder optimizar tiempos. Ejemplo
tengo el siguiente dataframe:
distrito<-c("A","A","A","B","B","B","C","C","C","A","A","B","B","C")
2016 Jun 22
2
Ayuda sencilla (SQL)
Muchas gracias, Carlos.
Sobre todo por el sqldf, que seguro me ahorre mucho tiempo. La opción que
se plante de primero d <- table(tips$day) y luego dim(d) me parece menos
eficiente y cómo que directamente sqldf("select count(distinct day) from
tips"), pero supongo que esos son gustos!
También son "cómodas" las líneas: aggregate(subjectid ~ cond, data = dat,
FUN = function(x)