similar to: samba and gpfs

Hi, I'm trying to set up samba share exporting gpfs filesystem and I strugle with setting sharemode to yes. Samba is 3.6.5, gpfs version is 3.2.1-29 (the latest available for 3.2 branch). Everything works fine when sharemode is set to no, but I'd rather insist to switch it to yes. That's what man page says: no - do not propagate sharemodes across all GPFS nodes. This should only be

Hi experts I have a trouble in access rights I am running Samba 3.0.31 on Solaris 10 x86 64 bits as member server of an Active Directory 2003 R2 domain (MYDOMAIN) using Identity Management for Unix I set rights to access a sub folder of a Samba share. On Solaris the user "toto" jdoe can write a new file. From Windows, the same user can't. Itlooks like OK when the primary group

Hi, I'm facing an issue with at least two Samba servers in production both showing important number of log entries like: smbd[27355]: PANIC: assert failed at smbd/oplock.c(149): exclusive_oplocks_open>=0 Looking at the source code, this panic is triggered when the number of exclusive oplocks for a given file becomes negative. Once triggered for one smbd process, this process can

When I try to open a specific file from a samba share (LSP), the application (on WINXP) says that it could not open the file. The errors pasted below (from the smb client) show something different from anything I've seen before. Usually these kinds of problems are straight forward. In other words, usually this is a permission issue. In this case, it is not. I am trying to open a file

Hello Volker, I was able to get those level 10 logs - spitted by machine. Unfortunately I don't know how attachments behave - Groupwise seems not to be happy with those - so I try the redundant way: Here are the logfiles for this event (only one machine, one try): https://www.bitmammut.de/WDR/log.klnmszap32 In this file there are about 3 occurrences of the

I have a reproducible intermittent error large site - "The specified network name is no longer available". This happens when copying large files. Below is part of log level 10 output & strace. Sorry for the long posting. I will probably need to put the loglevel 10 attached to a bugzilla - but thought I would try the lists initially. RHEL4 samba-3.0.25b-1.el4_6.4

On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 11:09:17AM +0200, Alexander Gast wrote: > I was able to get those level 10 logs - spitted by machine. > Unfortunately I don't know how attachments behave - Groupwise seems not to be happy with those - so I try the redundant way: > > Here are the logfiles for this event (only one machine, one try): > https://www.bitmammut.de/WDR/log.klnmszap32 > >

Hi, in the following scenario I've got the Problem of "STATUS_SHARE_VIOLATION". Client A (with User 1) copies a file to share X. (with: DENY_NONE 0x120196 WRONLY NONE) Client B (with User 1) reads this file from share X (with: DENY_NONE 0x120089 RDONLY NONE) Now Client C (with User 1) wants also to read this file from share X and gets the STATUS_SHARE_VIOLATION.

I'm running Samba 3.4.7 on Ubuntu 10.04. This is a recent upgrade and we've starting experience a sporadic problem after this upgrade. When users are browsing through Windows Explorer they sometimes run across folders that appear as unassociated files. This requires the user to click the 'Refresh' button in Windows Explorer to properly see the folders. The files and folders are

Hello! We indeed need debug level 10 logs of smbd. But I bet that you're running into an incompatibility between SMB and GPFS share modes. Those don't match 100%, so turning off gpfs:sharemodes might be worth a try. Of course, this means that you lose interop share modes. I'd be happy to analyze this further and assist you in making a proper GPFS query out of this if needed. With

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9466 Summary: GPFS ACLs are not copied by rsync when copying between two GPFS filesystems Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at

Hi folks, I am trying to set up a domain/forest in VirtualBox server. My setup: * # uname -a FreeBSD bsd1dc.ad001.osipov.eu 10.3-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p4 64 bit * Samba 4.4.5 from Ports tree # samba-tool -V 4.4.5 * Python 2 from Ports tree # python2 --version Python 2.7.12 Installation went smoothly but during domain provisioning Python fails with a segmentation fault

Hi Michael, I'm facing the same problem, samba 4.4.x is apparently broken on FreeBSD for now. Here's a link to the bug https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209787 For now the port maintainer seem out of ideas to fix this. You seems more skilled then me on freebsd, maybe you can help him on this bug :) DS On 07/20/2016 02:17 AM, Michael Osipov wrote: > Hi folks,

hi list, we have plans to implement GPFS in our heterogeneous environment (win, linux and mac clients; many linux servers) to scale better in file serving and improve availability. are there any recommendations regarding samba and GPFS and samba co-existing with NFSv4 (ACLs!) on GPFS on the same machine? or is this too experimental and we should either use samba or nfs in the cluster? i?ve read

I was reviewing the GPFS VFS module this afternoon after I had a request to add Thumbs.db to the hide files option. Now I was under the impression that the GPFS VFS module mapped this through to the Windows attributes on the under lying file system. That is assuming that your GPFS file system is sufficiently recent to support Windows attributes. I did some experimentations with a Terminal

Hi All, I'm having a frustrating time exporting a GPFS Independent Writer AFM fileset through Samba. Native GPFS directories exported through Samba seem to work properly, but when creating an export which points to an AFM IW fileset, I get "Access Denied" errors when trying to create files from an SMB client and even more unusual "Failed to enumerate objects in the container:

Hi all, I have a 2.2.7a member server (on Debian unstable), acting as a file server for a W2k domain (which also has some NT4 clients, ie. mixed mode). I'm also using ACLs. Imagine I have a file on the server with an ownership of DOMAIN+foo (full permission - rwx). I also have a user ACL on that file of DOMAIN+bar, also rwx. This all works fine. I was initially running into a problem

Hi, My company decided to implement security restrictions lately and I was to write more strict authorization modules for pam. One of it works asking for some kind of additional security string (for example pin from some kind of token). It is done by pam module, which asks calling application to do conversation for him: prompt_msg.msg_style = PAM_PROMPT_ECHO_OFF;

Hi Rob, on your Info for Version 3.0.25 you pointed out the VFS-Module GPFS for using features of the underlaying GPFS-Filesystem. Also the man-pages-3/vfs_gpfs.8.html points to that module, but I can't find it anywhere. We are using a GPFS 3.2 3-Node Samba Cluster (3.0.24/28) on Dell HW. We would be very glad if it is posible to get - Quota Recognition for our users (we use "max

Great information, thank you. Could you remark on GPFS services hosting mail storage over a WAN between two geographically separated data centers? ----- Reply message ----- From: "Jan-Frode Myklebust" <janfrode at tanso.net> To: "Stan Hoeppner" <stan at hardwarefreak.com> Cc: "Timo Sirainen" <tss at iki.fi>, <dovecot at dovecot.org> Subject: