similar to: 3.0.23 ldapsam:trusted=yes problem

Hi! I've one big problem. In my work we have a mixed network: one Debian Sarge with samba 3.0.14 acting as PDC and some w2k sp4 and windows xp sp2 pro/home with all updates (including w2k sp4 update rollup) . Samba uses OpenLDAP as backend using smbldap-tools 0.9.1 to manage users and computers. This setup has worked perfectly since december (the LDAP is used by other services as Apache,

Hi! I have a domain with samba+ldap working perfectly. The LDAP and Samba are in a linux vserver machine, but in the main host, not in the guests. The machine has samba 3.0.22 and debian sarge 3.1 up to date. Last week I try to assign privileges to different users with the 'net rpc rights' command and found a strange behaviour. ('asier' is a local user without privileges, not

Is there a page with support status of this feature in current samba releases ? What is the current status and future? -- Best Regards, Vladimir Skubriev System Administrator CVisionLab +7.918.504.38.20 skubriev at cvisionlab.com http://cvisionlab.com

Hello list, have a samba 3.4.3 as domain controller with openldap as backend, using ldapsam:trusted = Yes and ldapsam:editposix = Yes and everything works like a charm. Now i would like to use this ldap for storing more information about my users; full name, phone, address and maybe even a picture. InetOrgPerson is the objectClass i would like to use since it's standard and has all i need and

Something like this. But this link has no info that I need. On the roadmap: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Roadmap There is information <https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/LDAP_Backend#.28De.29motivation> about general purpose LDAP server as the backend (e.g. openLDAP). But that's not what i was looking for. I looking for status of `passdb backend = ldapsam` feature. This

Certainly: https://termbin.com/wr68 Thanks again! On 5/25/19 2:16 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 25/05/2019 19:29, David Kowis via samba wrote: >> Hello! >> >> Running on FreeNAS 11 and my smb.conf (via testparm -v) is here >> https://termbin.com/v748 > > Do you want try again posting the smb.conf, but this time run 'testparm' > without the

Hi, I am more or less following this tutorial Ldapsam Editposix = http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Ldapsam_Editposix but can't quite get my domain to work. I think the issue is with the idmap part of the smb.conf but can't quite figure out what's wrong with it or what the correct format should be. My SMB.CONF file.... #interfaces = lo0 em0 127.0.0.1 bind interfaces only = no

On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:29:56 +0300 Vladimir Skubriev via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > ``` > > [global] > > > > workgroup = EXAMPLE > > server string = > > dns proxy = no > > > > interfaces = eth0 > > bind interfaces only = yes > > > > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > > max log size

Hey guys, I've gotten my samba + openldap running quite well, minus one problem (that I know about). I've read over plenty of documentation, the official and other wiki's and such. I believe I have winbind working correctly, so I assume I won't have to use external scripts to add groups/users/etc.. But isn't there something one must do in order for their OS (in my case

Hello list, I'm trying to setup Samba to use: ldapsam:editposix = yes but I'm having problems to add users via "smbpasswd -a". It seems smbpasswd tries to modify an existing entry (and falling of course) instead of adding a new entry. Is that a bug, a configuration problem, or intended behavior? Do I need to create a postixaccount entry prior to use "smbpasswd

I tried setting up a samba/ldap domain using the ldapsam:editposix feature, using the brief instructions at http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Ldapsam_Editposix. Everything goes rather smoothly, and I can add XP machines and log into them as the Administrative user. I added a user to the server, then to samba/ldap using smbpasswd -a newuser ldapsearch -x shows the user & encrypted password, so

Hi Chris, On 22 October 2018 at 22:22, Chris Sims wrote: | The latest ess and elpa-ess 18.10-1bionic0 packages for ubuntu leave | ess unable to find initialization files when it is invoked from R via | M-x R. I've found a workaround by creating a soft link: | | cd /usr/share | sudo ln -s /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/elpa-src/ess-18.10 ess | | but this may be a widespread problem. It

Hello, I want to use samba v3.3.x to implement an NT4/Win2k style domain: a samba PDC and a samba BDC, using ldapsam for the 'passdb backend'. I plan to use RedHat Directory Server v8.2 as the ldap server. I'm trying to sort out how user/group management and nss will work. I'm confused about how/when the samba-supplied ldap schema is used (I mean the schema that's in the

Hello, I'm trying to use samba v3.3.8 on Centos 5.5 to act as a PDC, using ldap as the backend for users, groups, and computers. The ldap I'm using is Centos Directory Server v8.1. The setting is a new, never used before, installation of samba and ldap. There are no users other than what exists by default after a Centos install. The smb.conf contains what is my best guess for the

On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 11:56:05 +0300 Vladimir Skubriev <skubriev at cvisionlab.com> wrote: > вт, 5 февр. 2019 г. в 11:42, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org > >: > > > On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 11:31:53 +0300 > > Vladimir Skubriev via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > Something like this. > > > > >

The latest ess and elpa-ess 18.10-1bionic0 packages for ubuntu leave ess unable to find initialization files when it is invoked from R via M-x R. I've found a workaround by creating a soft link: cd /usr/share sudo ln -s /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/elpa-src/ess-18.10 ess but this may be a widespread problem. It appeared on each of the three computers on which I updated the packages, and

Dear all, I'm experencing a big trouble with samba and an instalation we had at my enterprise's intranet. This intranet is based on a Samba server v2 wich acts as Primary Domain Controller, wins server and file server. All these features works great nowadays. Our issue, is with a newest server that we are interested to replace the previous samba server in order to improve the performance

Hello guys! I'm using samba 3.2.4 (binaries from samba.org) on SLES9+sp3. I am building a PDC with LDAP support (i am attaching my config files), I'm also using ldapsam:trusted and ldapsam:editposix. Although I am setting the account lock after 3 failed tries in usrmgr, and verified that the parameters are actually set in the LDAP, no locking occurs. I started thinking that it was my

Sure. ``` [global] workgroup = EXAMPLE server string = dns proxy = no interfaces = eth0 bind interfaces only = yes log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 1000 # new options log level = 5 netbios name = FILES #panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d server role = STANDALONE SERVER local master = no security = user encrypt passwords =

Chris, For what it is worth, I made two more tests: - on my system 'M-x R' as well as the suggested-in-the-ESS-documentation 'M-x ess-version' both work whether or not I have my ~/.emacs -- so somehow system path must work - I have the .el files in the default directory: /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/elpa-src/ess-18.10 - They are also symlinked each into