similar to: POLL: Does anyone actually use multiple passdb backends on the same server?

hello the passdb backend no longer accepts multiple backends in a chaining configuration since samba 3.0.23a . question: will the following confi still work? passdb backend = ldapsam://ldapserver1 ldapsam://ldapserver2 ? the idea is to use 2 ldap servers werner Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm

Hi, i (naively) would like to have local AND ldap users (and groups...) on my standalone fileserver (security = user). "passdb backend = ldapsam" already works OK and i found some old posts on the internet about "chaining" passdb backends. so i tried "chaining" ldapsam and tdbsam, but although testparm doesn't complain and i can add local users with

On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 18:02:32 +0200 Harry Jede via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am Montag, 20. August 2018, 16:43:24 CEST schrieb Matthias Leopold > via samba: > > Hi, > > > > i (naively) would like to have local AND ldap users (and groups...) > > on my standalone fileserver (security = user). "passdb backend = > > ldapsam" already

Hello List, In regards to RPM packages, what is the difference in the prebuilt ones for example the FC5 RPM's directly from samba.org or obtaining the latest .tar.gz and running ./makerpms.sh for the desired distribution. Does this way optimize for example - x86-64 or SMP ? Cheers, Adrian Sender. -----Original Message----- From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:jerry@samba.org] Sent:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Folks, The migration is done and the new git repos are online. You can browse the repositories as well as find links to the documentation in the Samba wiki at http://gitweb.samba.org/ A few things, such as buildfarm integration, are still underway and will be completed in a few days. cheers, jerry - --

Hi Rowland, > On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 18:02:32 +0200 > > Harry Jede via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Am Montag, 20. August 2018, 16:43:24 CEST schrieb Matthias Leopold > > > > via samba: > > > Hi, > > > > > > i (naively) would like to have local AND ldap users (and > > > groups...) > > > on my standalone

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 (CC'ing back on list) Gianluca Culot wrote: > When the users change their passwords on the AD domain server > it takes one hour before winbind starts refusing the old > password (as it is in cache, I suppose) Nope. This is a Windows DC bug. https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2874 Unless you have enabled "winbind

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Folks, Just a heads up for everyone. We are aware of the problem and are continuing to work on resolving it. cheers, jerry ===================================================================== Samba ------- http://www.samba.org Centeris ----------- http://www.centeris.com "What man

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I've posted an updated version of my 3.0.24-gc dev branch to deal with the break in "force group" caused by the CVE-2007-2444 patch and backported the Vista related bug fixes from the Samba patches page. The bzr branch is hosted at http://people.samba.org/bzr/jerry/samba-3-0-24-gc.bzr/ The source tarball is available from

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Just a note: You might see a flood of bug report emails. I've fixed a problem with the MTA on bugzilla.samba.org. cheers, jerry ===================================================================== Samba ------- http://www.samba.org Centeris ----------- http://www.centeris.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Folks, I'm looking to remove some more old code. Does anyone use either of these features currently? cheers, jerry ===================================================================== I live in a Reply-to-All world ----------------------- Samba ------- http://www.samba.org Centeris

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Folks, We've brought a new wiki online at http://wiki.samba.org/ for Samba users and developers alike. The intent is to allow the community to fill the gap in dynamic or temporary documentation and other relevant information. Our thanks to Craig White who has volunteered to act as standing editor (at least at first). But in general, the wiki

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Warren Beldad wrote: > I have created a user with a password of 15 characters... > then disable: > -bash-3.00# smbpasswd -d user1 > Disabled user user1. > > Enable: > -bash-3.00# smbpasswd -e user1 > New SMB password: > > Why is this happening? Is there any limitation for > the number of password characters? >

CentOS4 RPMS for x86-64 would be awesome. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tony Hoover, Network Administrator KSU - Salina, College of Technology and Aviation (785) 826-2660 "Don't Blend in..." ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From:

I just found out that when doing a new installation in works. But as soon as I change the netbios name in the smb.conf the trouble begins... Everything can connect, but then suddenly the error does appear. Does Samba cache it's initial netbios name somewhere? -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Sander van Harmelen Verzonden: dinsdag 14 november 2006 13:59 Aan: Sander van Harmelen;

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Fabio Muzzi wrote: > Hello drweb, > > Saturday, November 25, 2006, 4:32:17 PM, you wrote: > > > d> By command: > d> pdbedit -r gad -G 514 -d0 > d> I cann't change primary group. > > > I was looking through the list archives and found your post. I have > the same issue. Any solutions yet? >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Folks, I've posted a short summary of the bug bash from yesterday at http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bugzilla_Day#8_Feb_2007. I've also updated the suggested patches for 3.0.24 at http://www.samba.org/samba/patches/. All of these are fixes for problems with Vista clients. If you want all the patches, it is probably easiest just to use quilt

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Folks, For the minority of people who still run RedHat 9 or earlier, I will not be building an RPM for Samba 3.0.25 for that platform. If someone wants to pickup maintenance of it, I'll be glad to turn it over. I will leave the RedHat-9 packaging files in for the 3.0.25pre2 release that we are currently working on, but unless I hear an outcry

Hi, I am interested in implementing the 'createservice()' functionality using the RPC protocol. I need this functionality badly, and I understand it is not implemented. I understand vaguely how this should be working and found some documentation, here: http://www.hsc.fr/ressources/articles/win_net_srv/ here:http://www.hsc.fr/ressources/articles/win_net_srv/well_known_named_pipes.html

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Folks, The public release announcements for the first release candidate of 3.0.25 will be in a few hours. Tomorrow, we are planning a Bugzilla day in honor of the release. See the news blurb for more details: http://news.samba.org/announcements/bugzilla_day_april_10/ If you want to participate, feel free to join the #samba-technical channel