similar to: Using group membership to access a symlink directory

I have recently switched from the UW imap server to dovecot and things seem to be working nicely. One thing that I can't seem to figure out however, is how to get dovecot to show folders that are a softlink. We run SpamAssassin. Users can use both their own personal spam folder as well as a shared spam folder. For messages that everyone would consider spam, the user can simply drag the

On Sat, Mar 13, 2004, somone posted a note which read: It seems dovecop pop3 server sometimes inserts a blank line at the top of the mbox. It only happens for certain users not all. I'm not sure why it's doing that. Looking back into the mailing list, I saw the same post in Oct 6, 2003 but there was no reply to it. Is there a patch or fix that i can use to get around the blank line?

Hi, I have a case where I only want to restrict access to SMB shares via filesystem permissions (and POSIX ACLs). Therefore, I do not want Samba to verify security in any way at the SMB level. If the filesystem/ACL permissions allow access to the shared directory, so should Samba. If the filesystem does not allow access to the filesystem, Samba should deny as well. I thought I had this

Hi! I created a Samba4 Demo Server to test AD functionality. Basically it's a Debian Wheezy machine with a manually compiled Samba4 (smbstatus -V: Version 4.1.0pre1-GIT-051a1a9) according to https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO but adjusted the paths to a more debian way. I can Manage the Server with the Windows Domain Utilities, add users, add groups, add Machines and so

Le mar. 20 ao?t 2019 ? 14:30, L.P.H. van Belle via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > > Hai, > > > > > In short. My network design previously work with Debian Stretch > > Servers and clients and some Windows clients (not many). > > > > Debian Stretch use Samba 4.5.16 so there is no unix_primary_group > > option for the clients. So I have

Does you filesystem support extended attributes? What does "|getfattr -n security.NTACL |filename" return?|| On 30.01.2024 16:13, Peter Milesson wrote: > Hi folks, > > It seems that the setting acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes reduces > Windows compatibility when defined for a share. In all attempts I have > used Windows tools (except editing smb.conf) > > Assume

Hi, I tried to configure the new idmap interface. Currently without much success. I have two samba domains, trusting each other. Each PDC using it's own LDAP server. I tried idmap domains = DOM1, DOM2 idmap config DOM1:default = yes idmap config DOM1:backend = ldap idmap config DOM1:ldap_base_dn = ou=Idmap,dc=dom1,dc=mydomain,dc=de idmap config

On 20/08/2019 11:16, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote >> The problem with that is, 'id' gets its info from the same place that >> 'getent' does, so the OP will still get the wrong group ;-) >> >> Rowland > Maybe i did not understand the question then. > In: id username |awk -F"=" '{ print $2 }'|cut -d"(" -f1 > $2 = GID

Le mer. 21 ao?t 2019 ? 14:34, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > On 21/08/2019 09:04, Prunk Dump via samba wrote: > > Le mar. 20 ao?t 2019 ? 14:30, L.P.H. van Belle via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > >> Hai, > >> > >>> In short. My network design previously work with Debian Stretch >

Hi everybody, I've searched deeply into the samba wiki and the list for some working examples, but I cannot find my way out, I'm a kind of rough samba user (let's say almost newbie).. so asking help here: This is my setup: DC (samba.my.domain.com <http://samba.my.domain.com/>): CentOS 6.5 with sernet-samba 4.1.6 started in "ad" mode (upgraded successfully from

Hi list, I'm having one of those 'I'm stupid' -problems with LVM on CentOS 5.2. I've been working with traditional partitions until now, but I've finally been sold on the theoretical benefits of using LVM, but for now I only have a huge pile of broken filesystems to show for my efforts. My scenario; I attach a disk, either over USB or iSCSI. I create a PV on this

Hi, we are using a _single_ LDAP server as backend for _multiple_ Samba standalone file servers (security=user). This LDAP server serves mainly other purposes and access for Samba is read only so the situation is not optimal but "it works for us". Still I don't understand one phenomenon concerning visibility of LDAP groups. The LDAP configuration in smb.conf for all our Samba

Am 11.02.19 um 13:22 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 12:30:51 +0100 > Matthias Leopold via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> we are using a _single_ LDAP server as backend for _multiple_ Samba >> standalone file servers (security=user). This LDAP server serves >> mainly other purposes and access for Samba is

Oh, I assumed you meant -d10, since -d0 turns off all debug output, so the output is long, but I get:- . . . GENSEC backend 'gssapi_spnego' registered GENSEC backend 'gssapi_krb5' registered GENSEC backend 'gssapi_krb5_sasl' registered GENSEC backend 'spnego' registered GENSEC backend 'schannel' registered GENSEC backend 'naclrpc_as_system'

Hi all, After setting permissions on a file. If anyone authorised to open the file writes to it, the ACL gets deleted and that person becomes the owner of the file and the group is reset to the default. For example, whenever a certain user opens and changes a file in the problem folder he becomes the owner and another gets kicked of the list: More clearly, lee was the last one to write to this

Le mer. 21 ao?t 2019 ? 17:04, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > > On 21/08/2019 15:14, Prunk Dump via samba wrote: > > Le mer. 21 ao?t 2019 ? 14:34, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> > > a ?crit : > > > >> On 21/08/2019 09:04, Prunk Dump via samba wrote: > >>> Le mar. 20 ao?t 2019 ? 14:30, L.P.H.

Am 11.02.19 um 14:22 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:46:05 +0100 > Matthias Leopold via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> >> Am 11.02.19 um 13:22 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 12:30:51 +0100 >>> Matthias Leopold via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>>

Hi, I've been running a samba server with winbind (CentOS 7) as a member of an AD Domain (Windows 2012 R2) for several months without a problem. "Suddenly" I'm seeing the problem that the membership in newly created AD groups isn't correctly visible for some users on the samba server or only after some indefinite amount of time. I'm looking simply at the output of

I am facing a strange problem related to authentication of NT users accessing the SAMBA server. Here are the details: Server: Solaris 9, SUN Ultra 60, SAMBA 2.2.7a with PAM and WINBIND Client: Windows XP, NT4.0, 2000 Symptoms: Created a share \\server\test (UNIX: /export/SMB/test) with access to group 'TestGoup' where 'TestUser' is a member. 'TestUser' is a member of

Am 11.02.19 um 16:33 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:40:02 +0100 > Matthias Leopold via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> >> Am 11.02.19 um 14:22 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:46:05 +0100 >>> Matthias Leopold via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>>