similar to: Windows client and kerberos without ADS

I'm wondering if anyone on the Samba mailing list has seen this problem with Vintela VAS and Samba. ---------- The problem I am having is that Vintela VAS knows about the groups in AD but Samba only seems to recognize a user's primary group in AD. So, if I chgrp a file or directory in Solaris to anything other than a user's primary group and share it out via samba, a user is not

Hi! I ask you to answer about question on my network : Samba PDC 3.0.1 with ACL and LDAP (NIMDA01). We have on the network the samba server (nimda01) and some win2k server, all of win2k server are domain member of my Samba PDC. On a win2k server, we have a DCOM application that have sometimes a problem. The problem is : the server don't answer, no shared directory and no DCOM service are

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1133 Summary: configure.ac sets wrong BROKEN_ var (snprintf/vsnprintf) Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: HPPA OS/Version: HP-UX Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: Build system AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=969 Summary: early setpcred() stomps on PAM Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.9p1 Platform: All OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: dleonard at

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1066 Summary: off-by-one error with GSSAPI names Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.1p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: dleonard at

Hello all, I'm gearing up for an RPM deployment of 4.2p1 on SuSE (SLES 9). However, the files under contrib/suse in the OpenSSH distribution appear to be out-of-date. In particular, SuSE seems to handle init scripts quite differently now. So, is anyone building local RPMs for SuSE? If so, could you post the .spec file you are using? Is there any interest in updating the contrib/suse

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1228 Summary: kbd-int device for AIX authenticate Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.3p2 Platform: Other OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: dleonard at

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1249 Summary: pam_open_session called with dropped privs Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.4p1 Platform: PPC OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: dleonard at

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1219 Summary: typo in ssh_config Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.3p2 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P2 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: dleonard at vintela.com

This is on Solaris 10 x86, do not see this behavior on Solaris 10 sparc. Seen on multiple machines. Sshd debug: debug1: server_input_channel_open: ctype session rchan 256 win 16384 max 16384 debug1: input_session_request debug1: channel 0: new [server-session] debug2: session_new: allocate (allocated 0 max 10) debug3: session_unused: session id 0 unused debug1: session_new: session 0 debug1:

Really Rowland? As quoted: >> I believe I need to examine TLS since when I set "ldap server require >> strong auth = allow_sasl_over_tls" or "ldap server require strong >> auth = yes" user and group queries fail. This is OBVIOUSLY using LDAP and TLS. If this was via NTLM/Kerberos, the above setting wouldn't make the slightest difference. But all that

I have the problem with smbclient -L ... This is a level 50 debug message [2004/02/23 10:45:00, 5] lib/debug.c:debug_dump_status(359) INFO: Current debug levels: all: True/50 tdb: False/0 printdrivers: False/0 lanman: False/0 smb: False/0 rpc_parse: False/0 rpc_srv: False/0 rpc_cli: False/0 passdb: False/0 sam: False/0 auth: False/0 winbind:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1028 ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2005-07-14 13:57 ------- Does the attached patch fix the issue you're seeing? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1283 Summary: findssl assumes existence of 'which' Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: v4.5p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org

Good evening- I am a systems engineer with BAE Systems and am looking to solve a Single Sign-On and file access issue using Vintela Authentication Services (VAS) and Samba. This is to be accomplished on Solaris 9 (0904) workstations and function within an Active Directory environment (e.g. Windows Server 2003). VAS is currently advertising that the capability exists to integrate Samba with Active

>What are you actually using for authentication ? We are using Quest Authentication Services (formerly Vintela Authentication Services), which is a Kerberos/LDAP/Active Directory client for UNIX & Linux. Authentication and Identity Mapping appears to work correctly, I can log on and see my uid/gid/correct groups list with SSH and group-based access for files and directories appears to

I''m guessing this is a common use case, but I wasn''t able to find anything in the site FAQ. We''re looking at using Puppet on about 100 servers to control which user groups have access to which servers. The use case is as follows: We have Groups of servers, for example: CUSTOMERservers (serverA, serverB, ...,serverK) ADMINISTRATIVEservers

Hello I've installed samba from ports (samba-2.2.6.p2_1) i configured /usr/local/etc/smb.conf [global] netbios name = SERWEREK workgroup = SIATKA security = share hosts allow = 192.168.0. 127. interfaces = rl1 bind interfaces only = Yes server string = Freebsd client code page = 852 dead time = 15 keep alive = 15 [Ogolne] path = /home/samba browseable =

On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 14:37 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Let's take a step back from from the implementation. What is a driver > for a virtio PCI device (i.e. a PCI device with vendor 0x1af4) > supposed to do on ppc64? Today, it's supposed to send guest physical addresses. We can make that optional via some nego or capabilities to support more esoteric setups but for

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1259 Summary: small typos in ssh-rand-helper(8) Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: v4.5p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P2 Component: Documentation AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: dleonard