similar to: change in winbindd behavior

On 10/05/15 12:49, Steve Thompson wrote: > On Sun, 10 May 2015, Rowland Penny wrote: > >> can you post your named conf files. > > Sure. This is samba's: > > dlz "AD DNS Zone" { > database "dlopen /mnt/domain/samba/europa/lib/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so"; > }; > > and this is BIND's (notice the last line commented out): > > options

On Sun, 10 May 2015, Rowland Penny wrote: > can you post your named conf files. Sure. This is samba's: dlz "AD DNS Zone" { database "dlopen /mnt/domain/samba/europa/lib/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so"; }; and this is BIND's (notice the last line commented out): options { directory "/var/named"; dump-file "/var/named/data/cache_dump.db";

I am attempting to setup a RHEL4 client to authenticate against a Windows 2003 R2 Active Directory Domain Controller. I am following the Samba HowTo Chapter 24 on Winbind, and everything works until I try to list out users from the AD. Here's what I get: # /usr/bin/wbinfo -u Error looking up domain users I can, however list out groups in this fashion: # /usr/bin/wbinfo -g

hey all, I'm just getting used to R and i'm having issues when it comes to reading my data in rows rather than columns. any good advice would be much appreciated ! here is the error: > data1 <- read.table(file.choose(),header=T) > x1 <- c(data1[1,1:5]) > shapiro.test(x1) Error in sort.int(x, na.last = na.last, decreasing = decreasing, ...) : 'x' must be atomic

Here are some comments generated by a new R user based on initial experiences with the tool. On-line help for tapply: The following appears "for to each (non-empty) group of values" It seems there's an extra preposition in this sentence. On-line help for cut: "break" should be "breaks" morley.data not available with the distribution. Would be helpful for

hi all I've been reading this thread with interest. As a rather novice programmer. I'm not being humble here, I really am not very good, I can do stuff, but it takes a LONG time. My spaghetti code even has meatballs in it ! Not being a great programmer I'm not really able to code something up, but it occurred to me something could be scripted, are the other posters suggesting

Hi, I don't know how to enable file sharing and locking capability in Samba 3.0.7. I m using FreeBSD 5.3 RC. I will be very appreciate for your help. Here is my conf file: [global] workgroup = AUTHTEC netbios name = SAMBA30 server string = Samba Server password server = passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m

I wanted to mention that I'm planning to start writing and sending out patches for this. Naming the attribute 'alloca' was really confusing, so I'd like to change it to 'inalloca', which follows the preposition pattern of inreg and byval. After discussion, we decided it was silly to add stackbase uses to alloca instructions. They should stay simple. Instead, we'll

On 01/15/2010 11:37 AM, Talin wrote: > Yes, that's closer to the frontend semantics: the variants of a > union type don't have any natural ordering, so list semantics could > cause problems. I agree. I probably shouldn't even comment, as I know so little about LLVM. But I've hand-written a couple kLOC of IR now and am starting to get a feel for the

Dustin Laurence wrote: > On 01/15/2010 11:37 AM, Talin wrote: > >> Yes, that's closer to the frontend semantics: the variants of a >> union type don't have any natural ordering, so list semantics could >> cause problems. > > I agree. I probably shouldn't even comment, as I know so little about > LLVM. But I've hand-written a couple

Samba 4.1.16, Centos 6.6 x86-64, BIND_DLZ 9.9. I have three AD DC's that were functioning normally. However, today I restarted BIND on one node, and it failed to start with this message in the log (names changed): May 10 07:02:49 benford named[6767]: Loading 'AD DNS Zone' using driver dlopen May 10 07:02:49 benford named[6767]: samba_dlz: started for DN DC=samdom,DC=example,DC=com May

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== If two heads are better than one, why do my shoulders hurt so much? -- Michael Samuel Finn ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== The Samba Team

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== If two heads are better than one, why do my shoulders hurt so much? -- Michael Samuel Finn ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== The Samba Team

Listmates, Samba has been trouble free for some time, but I have a very strange error related to one machine on my network that is filling my logs with smb errors. The box in question "ripper" is a normal WinXP box that is dual-boot with SuSE 10.3. The errors are received every 30 minutes or so: Aug 21 17:04:03 archangel smbd[3116]: [2009/08/21 17:04:03, 0]

Guys, After upgrade to samba 3.3.4 on openSuSE 10.3, I'm getting: Jul 10 02:05:14 bonza smbd[31942]: [2009/07/10 02:05:14, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_data(1136) Jul 10 02:05:14 bonza smbd[31942]: [2009/07/10 02:05:14, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr_internal(1676) Jul 10 02:05:14 bonza smbd[31942]: getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected Jul 10 02:05:14 bonza

I am using shorewall firewall. My firewall have two interfaces: External interface 192.168.9.254 and Internal Interface 192.168.1.1. I have a printer (HP) 192.168.1.200. I want to share my printer with PCs in subnet 192.168.9.*. I use static nat : /etc/shorewall/nat 192.168.9.250 eth0 192.168.1.200 No No And i open all ports for net to local:192.168.1.200 and all ports for

I am working with someone that has 3 locations in the state in three different cities, connected by routers, with the main office using a Linux server with a WanPipe board replacing the router. It looks a bit like this: OFFICE #1: Internal IP: 192.168.7.??? Linux (Internal): 192.168.7.100 Linux (To OFFICE #2): 192.168.8.101 Linux (To OFFICE #3): 192.168.9.101 OFFICE #2: Internal IP:

Listmates, In 8 years, since 2.02 (I think), I have never seen this behavior out of samba. I run a stand-alone server with WinXP clients. Somehow a legal assistant created (not intentionally mind you) files and directories with ACL attributes set: -rwxrwx---+ 1 cyndy ochiltree 21504 2008-10-28 16:48 AUTHORIZATION - employment.doc* -rwxrwx---+ 1 cyndy ochiltree 12804 2008-10-28 16:48

On 03/21/2017 01:41 AM, Thomas Schmitt via Syslinux wrote: > Hi, > > i have uploaded a little gz compressed tarball > > http://scdbackup.webframe.org/block_seq.tgz > > containing > > -rwxr-xr-x thomas/thomas 4552 2017-03-21 09:23 block_seq > -rw-r--r-- thomas/thomas 315 2017-03-21 09:22 block_seq.c > > To be unpacked in a suitable directory by > >

Hi, i have uploaded a little gz compressed tarball http://scdbackup.webframe.org/block_seq.tgz containing -rwxr-xr-x thomas/thomas 4552 2017-03-21 09:23 block_seq -rw-r--r-- thomas/thomas 315 2017-03-21 09:22 block_seq.c To be unpacked in a suitable directory by tar xvzf block_seq.tgz The binary "block_seq" was compiled on Debian Jessie. If it does not run, do cc -o