similar to: Undelete?

Hello friends, I am trying to learn recovering of file using debugfs. But even though i delete the file and run lsdel in debugfs it always gives me 0 deleted nodes found. Where am i making mistake?. [root at windce7 linux-2.4.32]# fdisk -l Disk /dev/hda: 40.0 GB, 40016019456 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 4865 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot

Having just spent a day trying to recover a deleted ext3 file for a friend, I'm wondering about this way of maintining undelete information in ext3, like is done for ext2: The last step in the deletion process would be to put back the (previously zeroed) block pointers. Since it gets logged to the journal, I _think_ that this should be safe. The worst that would happen is that, if the plug

Recently I've encountered a problem, and now I would preciate any help about being able to undelete files. My /var filestructured is mounted at /dev/hdc1 Part of my /etc/mtab looks like this: /dev/hdc1 /var ext3 rw 0 0 I'm using the e2fsprogs-1.23-2 package currently installed with Redhat 7.2 So, could anyone give me a hint of how things could be done to find deleted inodes? I've

Hi all (and developers in particular) I just got bitten by this Assertion. The one that starts as in the subject, and ends with: "!(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Lock)) != 0)" Google reminds me that it was mentioned a few times earlier this year, but I couldn't find any statement saying that it has been fixed. I got this in a 2.4.16 kernel, though the

I've been trying to use fsck to recover a corrupted filesystem. It appears the original superblock is corrupted too, as it has an inode count of 0. When I start fsck with -b 32760, it uses the alternate superblock and proceeds. However, it restarts from the beginning a couple of times and after the second restart it doesn't use the alternate superblock, stopping instead as it can't

Hello, I have a 1.3TB ext3 filesystem that has been in service for about 3 months. About 6 days ago the Emulex fibrechannel controller logged a SCSI error and the filesystem changed to RO. It appears that the filesystem instantly changes to RO and prevents the journal from working, therefore invalidating the filesystem. The filesystem was unmounted and a remount was attempted. The mount failed

Hello, I had the same experience than the one described in: https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/ext3-users/2001-March/000384.html lsdel in debugfs doesn't show inodes from files that have been deleted while the fs was mounted as ext3. Stephen said in this thread that handling this case was planned for the 2.4 port of ext3. Can we expect this feature to be added ? -- fabrice

Hi! I have made some extensions to debugfs to undelete or recover files from a damaged ext3 file system. Salvage or undelete files of damaged ext2/ext3 file systems debugfs salvage command can be used to salvage files from a damaged ext3 or ext2 file system. The code is alpha, so use at your own risk. the usage is: salvage first-block count-blocks Salvage tries to salvage files found in

Hi! Is there a way to view ext3 filesystem's maintained journal (in a human-readable-format)? I ask, because i have had a server crash before and now i'm wondering if i might take a look at last things that my server did straight before crash. I guess clarifying log insertions might be lost before buffers were flushed to disk. Thx.

Hello, a system here stopped because it had a hardware problem. We rebooted it and have now the following problem: The data disk /dev/hde1 is formatted as ext3. Obviously one of the inodes is bad and we get a lot of lines: Truncating prphaned inode 8863987 (uid=0, gid=0, mode=0100644, size=742) when running fsck. These lines have always the same values (inode, mode, ... are equal) and ar enow

Over the last two days we've been seeing a fair bit of this: ---- # ls -laR > /dev/null ... ls: ./server2/b/user/bxyz/392.: Input/output error ---- This is with the latest htree patches applied to 2.4.19, and latest e2fsprogs-test, on a dual AMD system, with 5x73GB SCSI drives on a MegaRAID controller. We're using the gcc 2.96 that comes with RH7.3. esfsck shows "Inodes that

Hi, yesterday I upgraded my kernel to 2.4.15-pre6 (after months of using only ac-kernels) and had my first ext3-error since 0.0.3 . syslog tells me : Nov 20 18:16:31 enterprise kernel: EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,9)): ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory #47390: inode out of bounds - offset=0, inode=404363549, rec_len=4096, name_len=23 and the system remounted /usr to ro. I don't have

New EXT3 Packages have been uploaded to ftp.beta.redhat.com today. We have expanded the packages offering by popular request :-) You may download these packages via anonymous ftp, or via the web page at http://www.beta.redhat.com/. BUGS Bugs against these packages should still be posted at bugzilla.redhat.com Product: Red Hat High Availability Server Version: beta Component: ext3

I am trying in vain to discover any way to undelete a deleted directory on a ext3 filesystem. I have followed the recommended steps of immediately unmounting the file system containing the directory and remounting it as read-only, but have no luck: debugfs indicates no deleted inodes. If there is no disk activity following the incident, how can the data disappear? Any and all suggestions would

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Searching in the ext3 filesystem mailing list I have seen that there is an indexed directory extension for it. Is this extension stable code ? Has anyone test it ? How may I obtain and install it ? Is it available in any of the last kernel releases ? Greetings. - --- Carles Xavier Munyoz Baldó carles@descom.es Descom Consulting Telf: +34

Hello, We have run and stopped by chance command "fsck -y" on one of our raid disks (with ext3 file system). After that we have found that SOME files disappeared (they are not seen in the directories where they have been before). The data are extremely important and contain a lot of programs, scripts for some data analysis and very hard to recover by hands. I have run ''fsck

Hello all, I have count data with about 36% of observations being zeros. I found in some of the examples of the r-help mail archives that a tweedie family of distributions could be used to fit a model with random effects. Upon installing the tweedie package and attempting to fit the following model: lmer(SUS ~ 1 + (1|

Hi all I've been getting some emails from the R package maintainers that I need to update some code in a CRAN packge that uses FORTRAN, to comply with (not so recent) changes. I've been a little busy... I'm having trouble adjusting my code. I hope someone can help. The package was working fine, and a few R functions in my package had lines like this: tmp <- .Fortran(

Hi, I have a dovecot 2.3.2.1 instance running here that is getting userdb and passdb data from a SQL database. This was a cyrus server migrated over and all users are happy. All users except one: Said user asked if it would be possible to disable subaddressing (localuser+folder at example.com) again. The setting controlling that is AFAIK the lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox item. My idea was to

Dear Catarina, I prefer to leave the AIC value as NA for the tweedie GLM family because it takes extra time to compute and is only occasionally wanted. It's easy to compute the AIC yourself using the dtweedie() function of the tweedie package. Best wishes Gordon At 03:05 AM 14/08/2007, Catarina Miranda wrote: >Dear Gordon; > >I have also sent this email to R help mailing list,