similar to: Samba 3 problem with users not being able to log on from some machines but they can logon from others

I've just upgraded the version of Samba we're running from 2.2.2 to 3.0.2a and am seeing an issue with permissions on directories. Users can still map the shares that are set up, but cannot access the directories within those shares. This is also not consistent; it's not happening to all users. Our environment: Samba 3.0.2a Domain Authentication to a Win2K server No Winbind Solaris

The issue is that there is no runtime function. I'm not sure we're in the same page but just in case we aren't I'm trying to provide support for built-in functions at compilation time. Some functions can be expressed in LLVM and others only in the target language. For the first group I'm trying to inline the implementation in a module pass added in addPassesToEmitFile. For the

If you add an ASM node, you won't be able to JIT the result. I don't know if you care about that or not, but ASM nodes aren't supported by the execution engine. (If you do want to JIT, you could always dump the machine code to memory and link its location to a global using ExecutionEngine::addGlobalMapping), and then JIT whatever needs to call it. Obviously, it won't get inlined

I don't see why. Your compiler would just do a declare and then a call, and your runtime function gets called. On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Javier Martinez<javier at jmartinez.org> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Thanks for the reply. If I understand correctly, your suggestion is to have > the backend call a library that handles the built-in functions. Would the > calls need

Hi Daniel, Thanks for the reply. If I understand correctly, your suggestion is to have the backend call a library that handles the built-in functions. Would the calls need to be lowered and redirected (e.g. by a big switch statement or a jump table) to the corresponding function in the library? Thanks, Javier On 7/20/2009 12:11 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > Hi Javier, > > I'm not

Hi Javier, I'm not the right person to answer your question, but since no one else took it: I believe this is a situation where the backend would typically emit a call the the compiler's runtime library (e.g., libgcc). While it isn't currently completely wired up, we do have our own compiler runtime library available under the compiler-rt project in the LLVM repo. - Daniel On Thu,

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Javier Martinez <javier at jmartinez.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm working in adding support for 64-bit integers to my target. I'm using > LLVM to decompose the 64-bit integer operations by using 32-bit registers > wherever possible and emulating support where not. When looking at the bit > shift decomposition I saw what seems to be a

Migrating a working Samba 2.2.8a Domain Controller to 3.0.2a Using smbpasswd file compiled using gcc 3.2.2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------- Used working 2.2.8 configuration ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------- #authentication as PDC workgroup = XNET domain logons = yes domain master = yes

Hello, I'm having trouble getting LLVM to use UMUL_LOHI instead of MUL for unsigned integers. In the TargetLowering constructor I have: setOperationAction(ISD::MUL, MVT::i32, Expand); setOperationAction(ISD::SMUL_LOHI, MVT::i32, Legal); setOperationAction(ISD::UMUL_LOHI, MVT::i32, Legal); The problem seems to be with the code in LegalizeOp() in LegalizeDAG.cpp. Here's a snipet of

Hi, I'm trying to add support in my back end for certain functions that are seen as built-in by the target. Some of these functions can be implemented in a) LLVM, and some in b) the native target language. My approach to case a) is to write the built-in function implementation in C, compile it to LLVM using Clang, link it to the module that uses it and finally add a pass to inline it.

Hi Evan, Thanks for the useful pointer. When trying to implement the example to my situation I ran into a strange issue that I don't know how to resolve. My target doesn't support 64-bit operations and so far all operations have been expanded using LLVM except for division and remainder. For division, LLVM only gives you the option of either calling an external library or custom lowering

I'm at my wits end here so hopefully someone can help me. Currently I have a Redhat 9.0 box running Samba 2.2.7 with openldap 2.0.27 as a PDC Domain logins work great with this setup. I can add, remove, modify computers and users all day long without a glitch. I do not store usernames in the local smbpasswd or passwd files. User information is stored in ou=Users,dc=mydomain,dc=com Group

Hello, I'm working in adding support for 64-bit integers to my target. I'm using LLVM to decompose the 64-bit integer operations by using 32-bit registers wherever possible and emulating support where not. When looking at the bit shift decomposition I saw what seems to be a bug in the implementation. The affected function is ExpandShiftWithUnknownAmountBit in LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi * ! I just posted a message (I thought) a day ago. I'm not sure that my message reached the mailing list so I try to send it again! Please !!! If somebody has an idea where the problem is ... tell me! Here comes the message again (this time completely in english): - ---- snip ----- I have set up Samba as a PDC / Logon-Server for W2K

I am running samba (2.2.7a) on a solaris box on a network seperate from our windows clients. (different subnet) We have a mix of Win2k and winXP clients that are connecting to it. I recently upgraded from NT 4.0 domains to active directory on Win2K servers, and I would like to completely do away with netbios and WINS. The problem is getting clients to connect to the samba server. I have

Thanks Eli. I didn't know that the operand sign didn't affect the operation as I've never done multiplication at the bit level. Javier On Tue, 8 Dec 2009 20:16:23 -0800, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Javier Martinez <javier at jmartinez.org> > wrote: >> Eli, >> >> I think it is an error for LLVM

I forgot to forward to the rest of the list... -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] NaNs and Infinities Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 23:41:43 -0700 From: Javier Martinez <javier at jmartinez.org> To: lost <lostfreeman at gmail.com> Hi, If it's an immediate you can cast the SDValue to a ConstantFP and use the isNaN() or isInfinity() member functions (see below).

I'm configuring a new samba 4.1 server with NT4 style domain. I've copied most of the configuration from our working 3.6 server, making some changes as needed for the newer samba version. So far, I have been unable to get roaming profiles to work. It seems like the users cannot write in the profiles directory, but I don't see why not. Here is the relevant part of smb.cond [global]

ciao. i'm using samba 3.0.30 from gentoo (emerge). [ebuild R ] net-fs/samba-3.0.30 USE="acl cups ipv6 pam python quotas readline winbind -ads -async -automount -caps -doc -examples - fam -ldap (-selinux) -swat -syslog" LINGUAS="-ja -pl" 20,030 kB i didn't found many howto on this... but i did red the howto

Hello, please guys, any help will be appreciated. I have two linux servers (samba-3.0.2-6.3E) with RHEL 3E: Server one: Configured as logon server (network inside) The other server: with the user's accounts. (network dmz) The error message in "one": [root@linux root]# smbstatus -b Server's Role (logon server) conflicts with server-level security The "other" server