similar to: Samba 3.0.2a and smbfs (2.4.21) sometimes missing files (CRITICAL BUG)

I have been trying to do a nls model and gives me the error of a nonnumeric argument table(file="c:/tt2.txt",header=T) > fit.model <- nls(TT~60*(1+alpha*(v/c)^beta),data=tt2, start=list(alpha=1, beta=3, v=1000)) Error in v/c : non-numeric argument to binary operator > is.numeric(tt2) [1] FALSE > is.character(tt2) [1] FALSE > as.numeric(tt2) Error: (list)

WwW.Bitmezbusevda.Com <http://www.Bitmezbusevda.Com> Yeni Filmler Eklenmiştir 60 Saniye http://www.bitmezbusevda.com/forum/showthread.php/60-saniye-tr-dublaj-2342.html Gizli Deney http://www.bitmezbusevda.com/forum/showthread.php/gizli-deney-tr-dublaj-2340.html Akrep Kral http://www.bitmezbusevda.com/forum/showthread.php/akrep-kral-tr-dublaj-2339.html Şeytanın Tohumları

Help solving a performance mystery would be welcome. I have two test programs: * one totally CPU bound (it just infinitely loops) * the other I/O bound (it loops, each time doing * a write, * an fsync or fdatasync (I get similar behavior with either), * an lseek to back up to the same position again Under ext2, if I run these two together, they each run nearly as fast as

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104 ------- Additional Comments From gandalf@netfilter.org 2004-05-29 23:45 ------- iptables calls getsockopt() twice, first with SO_GET_INFO which locks the table in kernel and returns some info and then unlocks the table, among that info is the size of the table. Then iptables allocates memory and calls getsockopt() again but

Hello, I have a RedHat 9 system mounting a windows share from a Windows XP Home machine that can't read new files put there sometimes, BUT, it can see them - it just gets permission denied. Here are some data points: 1. I mount the share with "smbmount" or "mount -t smbfs ..." and I pass a username and password, but windows always sees me as a guest. I suspect this

Hi! I am using smbfs to mount a NT 4.0 SP3 disk to a Linux 2.0.33 box (SuSE 5.1). This works most of the time. Sometimes, I get a syslog entry |Jun 26 23:03:10 palandt kernel: smb_dont_catch_keepalive: server->data_ready == NULL on the smbmount command, which subsequently fails "illegal parameter". What am I doing wrong? I currently can't browse the digest archives because my

Hi Ralph, Again, thanks so much for doing all this! Plus thanks to all the folks who contributed to the new release! Quick clarifying question -- Isn't CVE-2018-10392 (looks like it’s fixed in https://gitlab.xiph.org/xiph/vorbis/-/issues/2335) also included in new version 1.3.7? If so can you please add it to release notes? (I asked the same question in

Greetings, I am new to R and am having trouble with parsing a file with the following characteristics: * Individual results for a single sample are written to multiple lines. * First 16 columns are constant from sample to sample. * Remaining 10 need to be matched up (cross-tabbed?) o (the exact contents for the remaining 10 vary from sample to sample, as indicated in

Hi Ralph and libvorbis developers, I thought the vorbis gitlab project was the main development site (https://gitlab.xiph.org/xiph/vorbis) because that's what the NVD CVE tracker points to for the two CVEs I mentioned. But I just realized there's also a vorbis github project (https://github.com/xiph/vorbis). Both appear to have recent activity. Is the gitlab project the correct one

Ok, I wasn't able to track down the original steps to reproduce this issue,s but we believe CVE-2018-10393 is a dupiicate of CVE-2017-14160, both fixed by commit 018ca26dece6. Because of the confusion, I added additional bounds checks to the bark_noise_hybridmp function, which make it clear to local analysis that no for bugs in this class are possible. This change is in commit a9eb99a5bd6f.

Yes, the gitlab instance is the correct upstream development repository. We maintain a mirror at github for the convenience of developers there. Cheers, Ralph On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 21:27 +0000, Ellen Johnson wrote: > Hi Ralph and libvorbis developers, > I thought the vorbis gitlab project was the main development site ( > https://gitlab.xiph.org/xiph/vorbis) because that's what

Hi Ralph, Thank you for your reply! For context -- we consider reported CVEs as bugs even if it's in a third-party library we use (such as libvorbis). We first determine if the CVE is something that would impact our customer workflows. In this case because of our use of libvorbis for audio I/O, it does impact our customers so we need to resolve the CVE as soon as possible. In the

Im trying to connect My Red Hat 9 machine dual with Win 2000 Server with my XP laptop, but i have problems doing it i realise that i can see all my partitions except NTFS (win 2000) and my home partition I run testparm and my smb.conf seems to be correct, I run findsmb: *=DMB +=LMB IP ADDR NETBIOS NAME WORKGROUP/OS/VERSION

Hi libvorbis developers! I'm wondering if you had a chance to see my request for releasing a new libvorvis version - this is to have an official libvorbis release containing the CVE fixes that appear to be fixed in the master branch. Is there anything we can do to help with getting a release out? We're happy to work with you on this. Please let us know if we can do anything to help

Hi Ellen, Thanks for your kind offer to help the release along. We have indeed been having trouble finding resources for that. You can certainly help by testing the git master branch with your software and reporting any issues you find. Otherwise, triaging outstanding bug reports and patches is always helpful, although that's not essential for a security-based release. I'll try to find

I know smbfs is not samba, but perhaps somebody here has seen this error before. Basically, I can't use smbfs: [root@pandora samba]# mount //buildmaster/andreas -o username=andreas -t smbfs /mnt/smbfs added interface ip=10.0.17.30 bcast=10.0.23.255 nmask=255.255.248.0 error connecting to 10.0.16.6:445 (Connection refused) Password: [root@pandora samba]# ls -la /mnt/smbfs ls: /mnt/smbfs:

Hi team, i've got a behaviour that i can't explain at all i'm running a Linux, debian unstable, samba packages version is 3.0.2a, kernel versions are 2.4.22 / 2.6.1 and 2.6.4. FS is XFS. when i mount a share on an HP-UX/ASU server, i can see files with their real size, but when i try to copy them on my HD it appears to be 4GB ! When i try to open a file directly from remote, it's

SuSE 9.0 Pro - Kernel 2.4.21 - Samba 2.2.8a and 3.0.1-14 Here's my problem: On a box runninng XP, I have a shared folder which contains 130+ subdirectories. This share is mounted on my linux box from '/etc/smbfstab', but some directories do not show up in directory listings. It's never more than one, and which one varies, but generally seems to be in or near the last half of the

On 14.02.20 13:26, Eugenio P?rez wrote: > On Fri, 2020-02-14 at 13:22 +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> >> On 14.02.20 13:17, Eugenio P?rez wrote: >>> Can you try the inlined patch over 52c36ce7f334 ("vhost: use batched version by default")? My intention is to check >>> if >>> "strange VHOST_SET_VRING_BASE" line appears. In

I've got the same problem of this post of 19 Apr: > > Hi team, > > i've got a behaviour that i can't explain at all > i'm running a Linux, debian unstable, samba packages version > is 3.0.2a, kernel versions are 2.4.22 / 2.6.1 and 2.6.4. FS > is XFS. when i mount a share on an HP-UX/ASU server, i can > see files with their real size, but when i try to