similar to: samba pdc did not advertised as DMB

When I attempt to join my WIN7x64 ultimate clients to the samba 4.1 DC, the join request fails with the error message: "This operation is only allowed on the primary domain controller of the domain." ---------------- Samba is running on a clean install of Slackware 14.1 ---------------- 'net ads lookup' returns: Information for Domain Controller: (the_correct_IP) Response

Hello. I am faced the issue of working winbind/wbinfo in a large Windows Domain. My Windows Domain (Win 2008 R2) has many Active Directory Sites, and I have network access only to my local AD site. I successfully join my linux computer to domain and command `net ads lookup` says what all is ok Response Type: LOGON_SAM_LOGON_RESPONSE_EX GUID: XXX-XXX-XXX Flags: Is a PDC:

Is it working? I always get error when trying to list on other trusted domain. [root@wayang samba]# smbclient -L nt6-pwr -Uadminpwr Password: session setup failed: NT_STATUS_DOMAIN_TRUST_INCONSISTENT --beast

Linux debian1 3.2.0-4-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.2.68-1+deb7u1 i686 GNU/Linux it is serving as file server for a few windows pcs in a satellite office. I am trying to join the machine to a AD Domain in our main office. tried[b] net join -U duper%5HaveLefT -d5[/b] debug results:[code]INFO: Current debug levels: all: 5 tdb: 5 printdrivers: 5 lanman: 5 smb: 5 rpc_parse: 5 rpc_srv: 5 rpc_cli: 5

On 27/06/16 22:42, Thomas DEBESSE wrote: > Hi, thank your for your answer. > > > Are the 'File servers' joined to the domain ? > Yes > > > Are the smb.conf files you posted complete > No, they are abstracted ones, because they are very long > > > if not, can you post the complete ones, exactly as they are on the > computers (you can sanitize them if

There is Windows 2008R2 actng as DC and Samba4 4.5.2 acting as standalone server in the same network. Samba4 is set up to be DMB: domain master = yes local maser= yes browse list = yes os level = 254 preferred master = yes enhanced browsing = yes Windows 2008R2 includes also DMB role in itself. As following, if Windows boots first, before Samba starts, it becomes DMB and has workgroup<1b>

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen, I am writing to ask your help with a problem whereby 3 NT4.0 + Sservice Pack 3 servers frequently log (in their event lists) that the browsing service cannot get the list of domain resources (the reply to NetServerEnum2) from the master browser (when the boxes are functioning as backup browsers). The situation is :- . NT machines browsing on both NetBUEI and NetBT

Have there been any problems reported with running 2.0.2 on servers using security=server with a 1.9.18p10 DMB? We've run into a situation where I've upgraded 4 of our servers to 2.0.2 but the DMB is still running 1.9.18p10. We have had sporatic trouble with the upgraded servers rejecting correct passwords because the DMB seemingly would not properly validate them. Today, we ran into a

Referencing: http://www.linuxtopia.org/online_books/network_administration_guides/samba_reference_guide/17_NetworkBrowsing_34.html I've got two subnets (192.168.2.1 and 192.168.1.1). All the machines on both subnets are running XP Home or Pro and are all part of the same workgroup (WORKGROUP). I've added an OpenSUSE box on x.x.2.1 and have set it as the WINS server with a very simple

> On Dec 9, 2014, at 3:45 PM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I guess it's because we disabled the integrated-asm, so it won't complain when compiling the kernel. > > No, it's something different. The inline assembly (for whatever > reason) says to use a "dmb ishst" rather than an "stlr". I don't > actually

Should I just copy and paste the content of the .ll file? Thanks, Chengyu > On Dec 9, 2014, at 4:35 PM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Thanks for the IR snippet (I agree, it does look like the order is >>> reasonable there), but it's not really enough to debug the problem. We >>> need an actual Module we can compile and examine

I'm using r223407. Switching to a clean built on r223853, it still gives me: ldr x8, [x21,#8] stp x21, x8, [x19] dmb ishst ldr x8, [x19,#8] str x19, [x8] str x19, [x21,#8] Thanks, Chengyu > On Dec 9, 2014, at 6:32 PM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 9 December 2014 at 15:14, Chengyu Song <csong84 at gatech.edu> wrote:

>> Switching to a clean built on r223853, it still gives me: >> >> ldr x8, [x21,#8] >> stp x21, x8, [x19] >> dmb ishst >> ldr x8, [x19,#8] >> str x19, [x8] >> str x19, [x21,#8] > > Isn't that correct though? The problematic "str" has been folded into > the "stp" instruction, so "x19 + 8"

My network looks like this: internet 192.168.0.0/24 router ----+----+----+----- internal 192.168.5.0/24 | | | router ----+-----+------+- LNB--->mswin | | (also a | | | client | | samba | | .... | | server) | | samba | | samba

I have a long running problem with my configuration of Samba as a domain master browser. After nmbd comes up, all the machines on the network are viewable in the Network Neighborhood as they should be. But about half an hour later, Samba seems to lose track of several machines; they no longer appear in NN or /var/cache/samba/browse.dat. I recently upgraded to a packaged version 3.0.20b (for

If I have a client that wants to enumerate and access shares on a subnet, and that client knows the IP of the WINS server, is there any need for the client to use the "browsing" services of a DMB or LMB? What is the order of operations of the client? Here is what I imagine to be the case: 1. client asks LMB for a list of all available shares 2. LMB sends client the list of all known

Hello. Browsing accross subnets fails because "route2-3" can't sync its local browse list with the domain master browser "classix", which is also the WINS server. Everything else is fine. There is 1 and only 1 WINS server (classix) and no NT server. The error message in nmb log of route2-3 is: ==================================

Note: LMB = Local Master Browser DMB = Domain Master Browser Have Samba 2.2.7A running embedded in a variant of ucLinux. My interest was only to use Samba as a WINS server. I've set up the SMB.CONF with this config. for one test: wins support = yes local master = no domain master = yes preferred master = no os level = 0 I've set up the SMB.CONF with this config. for the other

I'm not sure, I was never able to compile the whole kernel with -O0, too many errors. Plus, the problem seems to be within machine code generation. I tried opt -O1 and -O2, the generated .ll file does not diff much for the target function (insert_leaf_info). Thanks, Chengyu > On Dec 9, 2014, at 4:49 PM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 9 December 2014

Hi Tim, > That barrier should be treated the same as any other dmb by LLVM. What > I'm most confused about is why it's there in the first place. From > what I can tell, the rcu_assign_pointer function should map to a > native store-release operation (stlr). I guess it's because we disabled the integrated-asm, so it won't complain when compiling the kernel. > Also,