similar to: smbpasswd trying to add instead of replace attribut

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "smbpasswd trying to add instead of replace attribut"

2004 Jan 14
1
Manual creation of machine trust and comments on Samba books
I just receive a copy of the official samba 3 howto, to be honest i'm rather disapoint with the content and layout. Well with free online version, i can't complaint, but with 'paid' version maybe i can complain to the author :-). Most of the contents are still the old documentation with few 'little' updation for samba3. Imo, its better if it can be rewrite from scratch
2004 Mar 02
1
Réf. : Re: Réf. : Re: using a master ldap server and a slave ldap server for one samba
If the first LDAP server faild, the second can be used directly. This server is a PDC server with more than 100 people connected and some application required domain authentification for running. For me is a critical server. ----------------------------------- St?phane PURNELLE stephane.purnelle@corman.be Service Informatique Corman S.A. Tel : 00 32
2004 Feb 27
1
Running nmbd without smbd
Is it possible? just for wins server, not for file sharing. --beast
2004 Jan 08
2
Hows samba calculating sambaPwdMustChange?
When samba password has been expired, user are force to change their password from client WS. Samba will modify sambaPwdMustChange attribute and the value seems always "2147483647", this not happen when changin password with smbpasswd. >From where samba calculate value for "sambaPwdMustChange"? is it constant? Is it possible to specify different value? Tks.
2004 Jan 15
2
Good News, ou=computer works! :-)
I'm just storing machine accounts under ou=computer,ou=site,dc=domain,dc=com and it works. Tested with W2K sp2 and W2K sp3, recreating from fresh ldif 2 times were never failed. Im sure it is 'stable' right now :-) 'works' means it was able to add machine trust on-the-fly, or using manual creation with smbpasswd command. The key is in not to use
2004 Mar 18
1
secrets_fetch_trusted_domain_password
It apparently samba stored trusted info on secret.tdb so only samba PDC was able to retrieve this info, am I correct? (though trust account waqs stored in ldap). I can't browse samba BDC from (trusted) NT domain, it always ask for username/password again. samba domain = IRSJKT NT domain = DOMJKT msg from samba BDC : [2004/03/18 21:16:42, 5] auth/auth_util.c:make_user_info_map(216)
2004 Mar 02
1
Réf. : Re: Réf. : Re: Réf. : Re: using a master ldap server and a slave ldap server
The origine of my message is a problem with my local LDAP server. last thursday I upgraded my RH 8 with the glibc update from RedHAt, after sometimes the LDAP server is unreachable. In log : Mar 2 11:40:02 coradm01 slapd[5342]: warning: cannot open /etc/hosts.allow: Too many open files Mar 2 11:40:02 coradm01 slapd[5342]: warning: cannot open /etc/hosts.deny: Too many open files Mar 2 11:40:02
2004 Jul 15
2
Samba LDAP Problem
Dear Lists, I try to configure Samba as PDC LDAP backend with Linux-Suse-9.1 and smbldap-tools form www.idealx.org, I follow guide from SMB-3 by Example book. Step by step installation and configuration came with no error. except i couldnt join w2k workstation to the new domain with administrator account. # /var/lib/samba/sbin/smbldap-usershow administrator dn:
2001 Dec 11
1
Using lib Rstreams and gzfile()
Hi all, in the last time I've intensively used Rstreams to read and write from binary files. Now I'm wondering if it is possible to use Rsteams functions with gzipped files. But I haven't found the trick: > p1c.gzip <- gzfile("daten/p1c_all.mea.gz", open="rb") > readBin(p1c.gzip, integer(), n=64,size=2) [1] 84 1 400 1 749 0 0 0
2005 Apr 02
3
Bug#302744: logcheck-database: postfix rules
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.36 Severity: wishlist Hello, I recently blew away my old logcheck-databse and lost a number of changes that i had made to postfix entries. The default database for postfix reports the following errors that do not seem to be important... Apr 2 13:00:19 terminus postfix/local[29516]: 574B9B3B9F: to=<doug at localhost>, relay=local, delay=13,
2012 Apr 02
6
[LLVMdev] pb05 results for current llvm/dragonegg
Attached are the Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results for current llvm/dragonegg svn on x86_64-apple-darwin11 built against Xcode 4.3.2 and FSF gcc 4.6.3. The benchmarks for -msse3 and -msse4 appear identical (at least for degg+optnz). This is fortunate since there seems to be a bug in -msse4 on 2.33 GHz (T7600) Intel Core 2 Duo Merom (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12434).
2012 Apr 03
0
[LLVMdev] pb05 results for current llvm/dragonegg
Hi Jack, > Attached are the Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results for current llvm/dragonegg svn > on x86_64-apple-darwin11 built against Xcode 4.3.2 and FSF gcc 4.6.3. thanks for the numbers. How does this compare to LLVM 3.0 - were there any regressions? Ciao, Duncan. The benchmarks > for -msse3 and -msse4 appear identical (at least for degg+optnz). This is fortunate > since
2012 Apr 03
3
[LLVMdev] pb05 results for current llvm/dragonegg
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:26:38AM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Jack, > >> Attached are the Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results for current llvm/dragonegg svn >> on x86_64-apple-darwin11 built against Xcode 4.3.2 and FSF gcc 4.6.3. > > thanks for the numbers. How does this compare to LLVM 3.0 - were there any > regressions? The results from just before
2012 Apr 03
0
[LLVMdev] pb05 results for current llvm/dragonegg
On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 08:57:51 -0400 Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:26:38AM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > > Hi Jack, > > > >> Attached are the Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results for current > >> llvm/dragonegg svn on x86_64-apple-darwin11 built against Xcode > >> 4.3.2 and FSF gcc 4.6.3. > > >
2011 Oct 12
0
[LLVMdev] dragonegg svn benchmarks
Hi Chris, >> PS: With -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns the LLVM optimizers are run at >> the following levels: >> >> Command line option LLVM optimizers run at >> ------------------- ---------------------- >> -O1 tiny amount of optimization >> -O2 or -O3 -O1 >> -O4 or -O5
2011 Oct 11
4
[LLVMdev] dragonegg svn benchmarks
On Oct 8, 2011, at 12:05 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > PS: With -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns the LLVM optimizers are run at > the following levels: > > Command line option LLVM optimizers run at > ------------------- ---------------------- > -O1 tiny amount of optimization > -O2 or -O3 -O1 > -O4 or -O5
2007 Jul 10
0
backgroundrb.ppid
Howdy, I''m trying to use monit with backgroundrb, but it seems that backgroundrb.ppid isn''t holding the id of the backgroundrb task. jodi at soup/var/www/the-soup/current $ cat log/backgroundrb.ppid 23182 jodi at soup/var/www/the-soup/current $ ps -efl 1 S deploy 23184 1 0 75 0 - 27056 stext 11:27 ? 00:00:04 backgroundrb 1 S deploy 23186 23184 0 76
2009 May 13
2
ode first step
Hi all, I try to assess the parameters (K1,K2) of a model that describes the adsorption of a molecule onto on adsorbent. equation: dq/dt = K1*C*(qm-q)-K2*q I know the value of 'qm' and I experimentally measure the variables 'q', 'C', and the time 't'. t C q 1 0 144.05047 0.0000000 2 565 99.71492 0.1105625 3 988 74.99426
2012 Apr 03
1
[LLVMdev] pb05 results for current llvm/dragonegg
Attached are the Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results for current llvm/dragonegg svn on x86_64-apple-darwin11 built against Xcode 4.3.2 and FSF gcc 4.6.3. The benchmarks for -msse3 and -msse4 appear identical (at least for degg+optnz). This is fortunate since there seems to be a bug in -msse4 on 2.33 GHz (T7600) Intel Core 2 Duo Merom (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12434). I've added two
2012 Mar 21
0
[LLVMdev] Issues with flag namespace
Hello Dmitry, First of all, thank you for your reply. Because of it, I focused in create the lib that helped me. Second, I realize that actually there was one thing different between the machines: due to a more frequent use of the iMac, I have a group of environment variables that are set to my developer folder; and the $PATH is one of those. Furthermore, it seems that my default compiler for