similar to: Issues while compiling samba 3.0.2a

Dear list, I'm using samba 3.0.2a on a RedHat Linux server. Samba is configured as being a PDC. When I use the usermanager from SRVTOOLS.EXE on my W2K workstation I don't see any groups listed in the window below the userlist. Also when I look at the properties of on of the user (who is member of more than one group) I only see that a primary group is assigned, the one in /etc/passwd. The

Do I need any additional package installed in Solaris 9 before I compile Samba "with-acl-support"? Thanks, Hai >>> Tom Dickson <bombcar@bombcar.com> 12/24/03 21:49 PM >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I don't see WITH_ACL so I'm going to guess no. Hai Wu wrote: | Thanks. I am still not sure whether option "with-acl-support"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello! I'm currently trying to get ACLs to work with my Samba-PDC. I compiled Samba with the "--with-acl-support"-option and the configure-script says: checking sys/acl.h usability... yes checking sys/acl.h presence... yes checking for sys/acl.h... yes After install, a "ldd smbd" gives libacl.so.1 => /lib/libacl.so.1

Thanks. I am still not sure whether option "with-acl-support" has been compiled in the smbd. The following is the output: Build environment: Built by: root@hxwu-dt-tt Built on: Tue Dec 23 15:00:40 CST 2003 Built using: gcc Build host: SunOS hxwu-dt-tt 5.9 Generic_112233-08 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-100 SRCDIR: /space/hxwu/swinstall/samba-3.0.1/source

Whenever I try to read or modify ACLs from my Windows 2000 PDC, my Samba Domain Member Server (Security = ADS) does not allow setting ACLs, nor does it display the existing ACLs. - I have setup ACLs in my Kernel - I have translated and installed libacl and libattr - I can see and modify ACLs with getfacl and setfacl. - I have translated Samba 3.0.23d with --with-acl-support=yes - I have enabled

Hello I have samba (2.2.7a) shares on linux (rh 7 & 9) servers with posix-acl (both kernel (2.4.19/ext2 and 2.4.20/xfs) and samba enabled) and an nt 4 PDC. works fine except that I can't change acl of a file/dir if i'm not the owner, thought i'm in a group that has write access to the file/dir I set the "dos filemode = yes" as told in "man smb.conf", but it

I'm building 3.0.14a on Mandrake 10.2, trying to use the same config as my other servers (3.0.11), but ACLs are not working. In checking the outout of smbd -b, I see this line is missing: System Headers: HAVE_SYS_ACL_H .... But I am specifying ./configure --with-acl-support ... Adding an acl using 'setfacl -m 'NTDOMAIN+NTUSER' file does successfully add an ACL for the NT

Hi everybody, i'm getting mad configuring samba to join an ADS, resolve domain users and groups and set ACLs via windows explorer on a share mounted with POSIX ACL and extended attributes. At the point where i am, i've managed to get Samba join correctly the domain with idmap_rid backend working fine. I can correctly set (add, remove, modify) file acls and extended attributes

Hi samba group, I'm trying to get samba to act like Windows in the Security tab (to be able to add, remove, and modify ACLs on certain files/folders). We are running Centos 5.2 (2.6.18-92.1.22.el5) with XFS installed for the /share partition. I currently have these versions of samba installed: samba-3.0.28-1.el5_2.1 samba-common-3.0.28-1.el5_2.1 I am pretty sure the ACL is all

I have Samba version 3.0.2a-3mdk with an LDAP backend. Works great but I can't seem to get user manager for domains to work with it. I'm thinking that perhaps it might be a samba bug that has probably since been corrected. Can anyone validate this idea? Jim C. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | I can be reached on the following Instant

OK, I have RTFM. All the I could find. I cannot seem to set permissions via WINXP Pro explorer. No matter what I do all I get is access denied - even if I own the file. Samba log reveals: [2005/04/20 10:56:08, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(326) larry opened file xghost.bin read=Yes write=No (numopen=1) [2005/04/20 10:56:08, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1102) Transaction 19 of length 188

Paul, Your samba does have ACLs support built-in. Please check that your system has the ACLs support libraries. Since you are using kernel 2.4.x you need to have the bestbits acls support libraries installed on your machine. Check the documentation for XFS to see how to mount the XFS file system so it has ACLs support. You should manually be able to set POSIX ACLs using the setfacls utility.

Hello! I'm running samba 3.2.3 on my Ubuntu 8.10 server installation. I'm trying to use ACL in order to get extended user permission administration, but cannot make it work. My samba shares are on a ext3 partition, and i have enabled ACL in fstab. setting and getting ACL permissions on my files directly works like a charm. But when my users try to access files via samba they cannot

Unfortunately I don't know how to write AC macros to properly solve this problem but Cygwin does not (any longer) include cygwin/acl.h from sys/acls.h which is required for Solaris ACL data structures to work. So the CASE statement improperly short-circuits the logic. I have confirmed that Rsync builds using POSIX ACLs but haven't tested said functionality. diff --git a/configure.ac

Using Samba+winbind 3.3.8 as a fileserver on a Win2008 domain. getent and wbinfo is reporting correct informations about users. However, my groups directories are allowing people who shouldn't .. From the shell everything is working as expected, but not from samba.. What did I miss !? Exported share: /export/users drwxr-x---+ 7 root root 4096 Mar 18 14:57 group # (teams directories)

yes i have, this is my share-config: [share] path = /mnt/gluster/daten/share/ public = yes writeable = yes browseable = yes inherit permissions = Yes inherit acls = Yes map acl inherit = Yes nt acl support = yes vfs objects = acl_xattr F?bio Leandro Rodrigues Cordeiro schrieb: > Hi, > > Have you tried adding the share writeable? > [share] > writeable = yes > > att, >

Hello, i posted a question about a possible ext3fs bug a few month ago. I see this kernel-msg in the messages: Oct 8 18:30:00 o5s kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,10)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28 Oct 8 18:35:00 o5s kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,10)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28 Oct 8 18:40:00 o5s kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,10)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28 they repead

Sparc Solaris / UFS file system. I have some ACL's set up for a handful of users and its all worked flawlessly with every incarnation of Samba I've used over the past couple years, which would be most. Last Friday evening I upgraded from 3.0.11 to 3.0.13 and some of the users I have some ACL's set up for promptly found Monday that they couldn't save new Excel files, they'd be

Hi, I tried to use ATrpms (http://dl.atrpms.net/all/dovecot-2.0.11-1_126.src.rpm) to rebuild the rpms. It is shown the error message as following: configure: error: unrecognized option: --docdir=/usr/share/doc/dovecot-2.0.11 Try `./configure --help' for more information. I checked `./configure --help', it did contain the '--docdir' option. I don't know how to fix it. Then I

I am having problems with my NT Groups. I have slowly been getting more and more users that cannot gain access to shares. Some users that are in the same group can still get access, but others cannot. I am not sure how to explain this really well but I am trying. So lets say that I have user bob sally and joe. They are all in a group called Space that access a folder called stars. Our Primary